Wednesday, June 15, 2016
News Was Not All Good on Belmont Weekend
California Horse Racing Board member Steve Beneto said, â€śTo Hell with the bettors,â€ť a couple of weeks ago. Golden Gate and its jockeys put this attitude into practice in a big way on Sunday.
The pity is, this happened at the tail end of the most glorious non-Breedersâ€™ Cup weekend in memory, the Belmont Stakes Festival.
Instead of everyone feeling upbeat about the game, the latest screwing of the customers is the topic among those who follow and participate in racing most avidly.
You can only abuse people so long before they get disgusted and walk away. Indeed, there are already calls for a boycott of California racing as a result of this.
MIAMI, June 16, 2016--Golden Gate had a jackpot of almost $2 million Sunday in its version of the Rainbow 6. Because it was closing day, the pool had to be distributed without the â€śsingle winnerâ€ť qualifier. As usually happens, this attracted enormous participation of more than $4 million from bettors nationwide.
In the midst of the wager, the jockeys decided the turf course was unsafe and they refused to ride the 10th and 12th races on the grass. This was after they had already ridden three races on the turf, including the 8th race, which was part of the jackpot sequence.
There was no change in the weather or description of the â€śfirmâ€ť course. Maybe a new listing needs to be created, â€śchopped up.â€ť
If there was a potential problem, the riders should have informed management after one of the earlier grass races, before the Rainbow 6 began. They were not oblivious to the extraordinary action taking place Sunday.
The jockeysâ€™ decision necessitated making the 10th and 12th races â€śallâ€™s.â€ť The Rainbow 6 became a pick 4, which resulted in a tiny payout of $146.16 per winning 50-cent ticket.
The whales and syndicates, which invested tens of thousands, were royally shafted. So were smaller players who pooled resources to cover more combinations.
This abomination could have a carryover effectâ€”excuse the term--on all such mandatory payoff pools. A reluctance to jump in with both fists might develop out of fear of an encore wherever the bet is offered.
There is shared culpability here. Golden Gate, as painful as it might have been, should have announced a total refund when it learned two of the final three races would have to be allâ€™s. Management could not have been unaware that the turf course was problematic.
With the huge pool anticipated, no turf races should have been scheduled. They were, of course, because grass races draw bigger fields, which translates to more combinations having to be covered.
The jockeys involved have to receive sanctions. They were aware of what was at stake. The course couldnâ€™t have been that bad. They rode it three times earlier in the day without incident. Nevertheless, they made a decision that gave the entire sport a black eye with repercussions still to be felt.
The CHRB should issue fines and/or suspensions as the least of the consequences. The chances of this happening are, of course, nil. As Beneto said, â€śTo Hell with the bettors.â€ť
Et tu, Gulfstream
The Golden Gate fiasco was not an isolated event this past weekend.
Hardly anyone was paying attention because of the Belmont stakes, but Gulfstream had a situation which should not have been allowed in the 11th and last race Saturday.
Key the Storm, #13, was an MTO in the turf dash. With the race still scheduled for the turf, he should have been scratched no later than the start of the late gimmicks. He was not.
Unlike the weather in NoCal, heavy summer showers were in the SoFla area throughout the afternoon.
When the windows opened for race 11, which remained on the turf, he was still in the tote; wagers being accepted on #13. Possible Will Pays were listed in all the horizontal pools. Finally, at about 22 minutes to post, there was an announcement he was scratched.
Key the Storm had to be used in all the gimmicks. He was coming off a pair of seconds in a race in which his competition was a combined 0-108. Hunch players might have used him because of the Florida and New York weather, whatever. By leaving him in, players were forced to increase the size and cost of their horizontal bets.
When he finally was scratched, there were puny consolation payoffs in the pick 3. Players who had him in other multi-race gimmicks were SOL; switched to the post-time favorite, they lost.
Double bettors who might have keyed him backward with, say, three contenders in race 10, were automatic losers on two tickets since in order to receive a consolation DD, the first half of the DD must win.
Key the Storm was scratched only after the results of the 10th race were made official.
Other reflections from Belmont weekend:
NYRA should reconsider scheduling the Easy Goer as part of the Belmont card. It had three starters last year and five this year.
This was not unpredictable. The Belmont drew 13 and the Woody Stephens also had 13 entered. At this stage of the season, especially given the attrition rate of the Triple Crown trail, itâ€™s debatable there are more than two dozen 3-year-olds worthy of stakes consideration on the same card, let alone enough for a third stakes.
HRI executive editor John Pricci suggested making the Easy Goer a July 4 weekend feature as a prep for the Jim Dandy and/or Haskell. I like that idea.
NYRA came up about $30K short of the guaranteed $150K True North-Met Mile double. This one hurt because the bet wasnâ€™t as well publicized and anticipated as was the Belmont Derby-Belmont Stakes double.
If anyone can explain the value of guarantees at major tracks, where the pools are always sizable, I'd like to hear it.
Also lost in the Belmont afterglow and Golden Gate controversy was Russell Baze
's surprise announcement after, ironically, Sunday's 10th race, that he is retiring.
Baze, 57, leaves the game with an incredible North American record 12,842 victories, good for earnings of just under $200 million.
To put this into perspective, for someone to challenge his victory mark, he or she would have to average a winner every day of the calendar year for more than 35 years.
With most venues down to no more than a five-day week, which comes out to 260 cards a year, it actually would entail a winner a day for just under 50 years.
But those are merely the cold numbers. A family man, Baze has been a credit to the game every day he has been on the racetrack. His talent, dedication and integrity will be missed.
Written by Tom Jicha
Thursday, June 09, 2016
Belmont needs support to be Test of Champions again
The Belmont Stakes used to be called The Test of Champions. It was said to be the race breeders coveted most. This is no longer true. The emphasis on speed and speed breeding has made distance racing at the highest levels almost extinct. The only way to bring back longer races is for tracks to develop a coordinated sequence of stakes that would encourage the development of true stayers.
MIAMI, June 8, 2016â€”Tell the truth. How excited are you about this yearâ€™s Belmont Stakes?
Without a Triple Crown on the line, the thrill is gone. Itâ€™s just another good betting race on an exceptional card. But the tingle of a classic just isnâ€™t there, especially in the aftermath of American Pharoahâ€™s stirring feats of just a year ago.
The Belmont was known for years as the Test of Champions and the race breeders wanted to win more than any other. Neither is still the case.
Over the past 10 years, other than the indisputable choice of Triple Crown conqueror American Pharoah, only one Belmont winner has been voted the Eclipse 3-year-old championship, Summer Bird in 2009. During the same period, Kentucky Derby winners American Pharoah, California Chrome (2014), Iâ€™ll Have Another (2012), Animal Kingdom (2011) and Big Brown (2008) have been voted best of their generation.
Exaggerator seems to be the only Belmont starter this year with championship potential. However, itâ€™s revealing that even after his decisive Preakness win, Exaggerator still ranks behind Derby winner Nyquist in the NTRA 3-year-old poll.
The rest of the Belmont field boasts some nice horses, but there also is a maiden and two others who just broke maiden.
So much for the Belmont being the Test of Champions.
Breeders were jazzed about the Belmont when stamina was valued. That was an era when the Jockey Club Gold Cup, won five straight times by five-time Horse of the Year Kelso, was two miles and most championship-deciding stakes were at least a mile and a quarter. You can win a championship these days without running further than a mile and an eighth.
Speed is the new cherished commodity in American racing. A yearling who can shade 10 seconds for an eighth of a mile at a 2-year-old sale will bring more than one with Belmont Stakes breeding almost every time.
If the Belmont werenâ€™t the third jewel of the Triple Crown, it arguably would have declined to outlier status, almost a novelty race. Many horsemen, D. Wayne Lukas most prominent among them, have lobbied for years to have its distance reduced in recognition of the new breeding reality. Thankfully, American Pharoah silenced the anti-traditionalists for at least the next few years.
The solution is not to reduce the distance of the Belmont, itâ€™s to schedule more races at 10 and 12 furlongs. Breeders donâ€™t breed for staying power and trainers donâ€™t condition for it because there are few opportunities to make money with horses who specialize in running what used to be â€śthe classic distances.â€ť
Chances are none of the starters in Saturdayâ€™s race will be asked to run 12 furlongs on dirt again. A couple of trainers, who will start three of the 13 horses in the Belmont, wish this wasnâ€™t so.
Dale Romans, who is high on both his Belmont starters, Preakness runnerup Cherry Wine and Blue Grass winner Brodyâ€™s Cause, said there are horses who might not be proficient at a mile and a half now but they could become that if theyâ€™d had more mile-and-a-half opportunities after the Belmont.
It might not hurt to have at least one before the Belmont, too, so horsemen could get a truer gauge on their horseâ€™s scope. How about complementing the Peter Pan with a 12-furlong Belmont prep the same day. I have just the name for it, the Seattle Slew.
Donnie Von Hemel, whoâ€™ll start Suddenbreakingnews, said, â€śI would welcome more distance racing myself, but that doesnâ€™t appear to be the trend in American racing.â€ť
Itâ€™s a classic chicken-or-the-egg scenario. Racing secretaries donâ€™t write mile-and-a-half races because they are next to impossible to fill. Itâ€™s easier for a racing secretary to take the course of least resistance and write shorter and shorter races, which tend to draw limit fields, making upper management happy.
â€śWhat Iâ€™ve seen throughout racing is just more and more sprint races,â€ť Von Hemel said. â€śWeâ€™ve gone the last 15, 20 years to the five-eighths turf race going from a little bit of a novelty item at the end of a meet to a mainstay in American racing. I donâ€™t like it myself even though from time to time I have horses that run real well in those races. But I still think distance separates good thoroughbreds. The further you go, the more that begins to tell. At five-eighths, thereâ€™s not a lot of difference between a good horse and a not-as-good horse, whereas when you go a mile and a quarter and up, I think it really starts to show who are the quality animals.â€ť
Reversing this trend would take a coordinated, sustained effort by racetracksâ€”Iâ€™ll pause to give you a chance to stop laughingâ€”to write more distance races.
â€śThe tracks would all have to get together because they compete for horses,â€ť Von Hamel said. â€śThey all have to decide these are the kind of races weâ€™re going to write, so people are going to have to run where theyâ€™re at. Theyâ€™re not going to be able to go somewhere else and run in a shorter race. I think it would be worth a try. But it would be a tough thing because Iâ€™m afraid if it didnâ€™t draw big fields immediately, it would be dropped too quickly.â€ť
The Breedersâ€™ Cup Marathon, the last concerted effort to revive long distance racing on dirt, is the prototypical example. It was introduced in 2008 and discontinued after 2013â€”hardly an adequate trial-- because the fields were relatively short and not Breedersâ€™ Cup quality.â€ťThe conditions of the race have not developed into a competition that we believe reaches the standard set by the remaining races comprising the championships,â€ť the Breedersâ€™ Cup declared.
One way to revive a semblance of quality distance racing would be for, say, Monmouth, to card a mile-and-a-half stakes for 3-year-olds in July. Saratoga could follow in August, maybe Arlington or Laurel in September and October, Churchill at its fall meeting and Gulfstream and the Fair Grounds early in their winter meetings. This would incentivize owners and trainers to identify and develop distance specialists. Would anyone argue that fans wouldn't love it?
Gulfstream has made a step in the right direction with the H. Allen Jerkens Stakes at two miles. But there are no distance preps to feed this event.
For that matter, why not a mile-and-a-half race in the Claiming Crown? Make the starter conditions light enoughâ€”say for horses who ran for $10K or less--and Iâ€™ll bet it would fill.
The more these types of races are scheduled, the more preps that would be written and the more horsemen would make the effort to find horses to compete in them. As Von Hemel said, it will require a concerted, enduring effort to restore distance racing back to championship caliber in America.
Written by Tom Jicha
Thursday, June 02, 2016
Racing’s attitude problem: ‘To hell with the bettors’
No wonder horse players sometimes feel they are being played for fools. A California state official said last week during a debate on whip usage, "To hell with the bettors." At Parx, Ramon Preciado has come up with six more positives--all six horses won--but he continues to race by gaming the appeals process. Rudy Rodriguez is serving 15 days for a positive at Monmouth but can enter his horses in his brother's name. There is no point in advocating strict uniform drug rules when it is exceedingly difficult to enforce violations in any meaningful way.
MIAMI, June 2, 2016--Only a fool would expect a business overseen by someone whose attitude is â€śto hell with the customersâ€ť to succeed.
This is essentially what Steve Beneto, a California Horse Race Board member, said the other day. His remark came during a debate with jockey Alex Solis over whether riders should be allowed to use their whip three or four times in the final stages of a race. With all the problems afflicting horse racing, it is mind boggling that time would be wasted on such nit-picking, but thatâ€™s California.
To get back to the issue at hand, Solis said bettors, who are spending good money, have to be considered. Benetoâ€™s retort: â€śTo hell with the bettors.â€ť
Bettors are racingâ€™s customers. Anyone looking for an explanation why California racing is in a nose dive while business at Belmont, Gulfstream, Maryland, Oaklawn, Canterbury and other tracks is up--in some cases way up--need only reference Benetoâ€™s comment.
This attitude is typical of a lot of the people in the racing game in Southern California.
When business declines in most fields, one fix is to offer sales. Thanks to the owners and trainers in SoCal, the opposite was done. Prices (takeout) were increased. Their selfish attitude is we want more money. Who cares if it has to come out of the pockets of the players. This triggered a players' boycott, which is a big part of the problems hindering California racing.
The cost of a day of racingâ€”admission, parking, concessions--at Santa Anita and Del Mar is the highest in the nation, another major turnoff to customers.
It wasnâ€™t that many years ago that trainer Jeff Mullins told the Los Angeles Times, â€śIf you bet on horses, I would call you an idiot.â€ť
So whether itâ€™s at the highest level of state oversight, the boxes where the owners and trainers congregate, the executive offices of the track or on the backstretch, there has long been a contempt for the customers.
So California racing is getting exactly what it deserves.
Preciado thumbs nose at the game again
Ramon Preciado continues to make a farce of the medication rules. The Parx miracle worker has come up with six additional clenbuterol positives from March and April. All six horses won. The purses have been redistributed but any scores at the windows are out of reach.
The newest positives are in addition to those from 2015, which got Preciado 270 days on the ground and, of course, are being appealed.
Fed up Parx officials tried to eject Preciado from the track in April and refused to take entries from him. However, he was soon back racing because his attorney got the banishment stayed until Preciadoâ€™s appeals are heard. With creative lawyering, that could be a couple of years.
It gets worse. In an act of supreme gall, Preciado is suing Parx for denying him his rights. Unfortunately, horse players who lost money to Preciadoâ€™s hopped-up horses, have no legal recourse.
Preciado not the only one
Elsewhere in the world of racing outrages, Rudy Rodriguez, who some believe could match Preciado positive for positive, began a 15-day suspension Wednesday for a positive test result last summer at Monmouth.This is a step in the right direction--enforcing suspensions during the time of year they were committed, not during a down period in the winter.
Alas, itâ€™s a meaningless gesture. During Rodriguezâ€™s suspension, his horses will be allowed to run in the name of his brother Gustavo. What a joke.
Slew snub a disgrace
Nyquistâ€™s loss in the Preakness leaves Seattle Slew the only horse to capture the Triple Crown while still undefeated.
Slew broke his maiden at Belmont. He clinched the juvenile championship running off with the Champagne. As a 3-year-old he won the Wood Memorial before completing his Triple Crown in the Belmont Stakes.
As a 4-year-old he won the Marlboro Invitational and Woodward at Belmont before running one of the most gallant races in defeat anyone has ever seen in the Jockey Club Gold Cup. He closed out one of the greatest careers in racing history by winning the Stuyvesant at Aqueduct, which NYRA turned into a farewell event, commemorative T-shirts and all.
Yet, astonishingly and disgracefully, NYRA has not seen fit to honor his memory with a stakes named for him. There are stakes at Belmont named for Paradise Creek, Pennine Ridge, Dangerâ€™s Hour, Flat Out and Poker. These are outstanding runners but they didnâ€™t breathe the same air as Seattle Slew.
Iâ€™m going to keep up the campaign to get a stakes--an important one--named for Slew until NYRA rights one of racingâ€™s biggest wrongs.
Itâ€™s heartening to see Canterbury Park doing gangbusters with its new lowest in the nation takeout. The key for horseplayers is to not let up in their support now that the initial flurry of positive publicity has subsided.
However, there is one minor negative at the Minnesota track. Canterbury seems to be the latest track to emulate the Gulfstream twirl, having horses walk around near the gate until three or four minutes after the listed post. The dallying is pointless. Players figure out the routine and delay their trips to the windows accordingly.
Speaking of Canterbury, Angela Hermann, who became the only current full-time female race caller in America when she replaced Michael Wrona at Golden Gate, got her start in Minnesota as a fill-in. I got to hear Hermann a lot during my Las Vegas sojourn last month.
Hermann is concise and accurate, essentials in her field, but her monotone delivery is reminiscent of what you get on the phone these days: â€śAll of our agents are busy. We value your call so please stay on the line until a representative is available.â€ť
To be fair, she might just be feeling her way into the job and wants to establish herself before she puts her own mark on it. Once she gets comfortable she might add some flair. In any case, having a woman in the booth is one way to make the sport more inviting and less intimidating to female newcomers.
I still miss the Met Mile on Memorial Day.
Written by Tom Jicha