In contemporary racing history, the game we’re seeing played out now goes back to War Admiral and Seabiscuit, the battle of East vs. West.
In the older version of the game, the man from out West, Charles S. Howard, believed he had the best horse in the country. So he shipped Seabiscuit everywhere, taking on and beating all comers.
Thoroughbred racing, college football and boxing were the most popular sports of their day. But it took the egocentric connections of the country’s two best horses a long time to reach a compromise and create a sports event for the ages..
Samuel D. Riddle was the owner of the Triple Crown champion, leading candidate for Horse of the Year 1937. Riddle believed it unnecessary to accept a challenge leveled by an upstart, some nouveau riche car dealer from California.
Finally, however, Howard pushed the right button, the public clamored for the matchup and the press played it up big time. The result was the most famous renewal of the Pimlico Special ever.
There are reasons for the perception: Rachel Alexandra was purchased by the high profile owner of Curlin, Horse of the Year 2007 and 2008, who kept his promise to raise the filly‘s profile by seeking her rightful place in racing history.
As such, she was entered in the Preakness Stakes and, not only did she win, she was ridden by Kentucky Derby-winning jockey Calvin Borel, who opted to ride her instead of the Derby champion because he believed the filly was the best horse in the country.
Then, in her next start, she went out and ran the fastest Mother Goose Stakes in history, faster than at least four winners of the old filly triple crown, by a margin six lengths farther than Ruffian’s victory in the same race.
Wide margins, a combined 39-½ lengths, are extremely rare on the level at which Kentucky Oaks and Mother Goose fillies compete. She dominates the competition and beats the clock, too.
Zenyatta is already a champion. She’s never lost a race, which counts for a hell of a lot, and she’s won virtually all of them with dominating style.
And that includes the 2008 Apple Blossom in which Zenyatta defeated a defending champion, Ginger Punch, among others, most impressively proving she’s more than an All Weather wonder.
But that’s what makes the decision of her connections not to leave California, again, all the more quizzical. Then there’s something else.
Thus far, the camps surrounding both fillies have eschewed trash talk. Jackson’s only knock has been the “plastic” surface at Santa Anita. In fact, he even said he doesn’t hold it against any owner for doing what they think is best for their horse.
Neither did Zenyatta’s owner, Jerry Moss, who said only that no one would dictate the terms of a future meeting between two females that have dominated the racing landscape in 2009.
After the defense of her Vanity title, Moss said he’d like the two fillies to meet somewhere, that it would be good for the fans, for racing. On Sunday he said he’d like to challenge his filly a bit more, too, like Jackson wanting to define her place in history.
And this was after trainer John Shirreffs said they probably would leave California at some time this year.
The trash talking was left to turf writers, Horse of the Year voters who favored one side or another, coming down mostly along geographical lines. The tenor, it seemed, was beginning to shift.
Suddenly, Shirreffs ended any speculation saying that Zenyatta would race next in the Clement Hirsch, now run under allowance conditions. If they stuck to their original plan, she need not carry the grandstand again.
It’s apparent that Jackson’s making the decisions for Rachel while Shirreffs seems the prime mover of Zenyatta’s future.
Surprisingly, between Sunday and Monday evening, the Moss message changed: They would stick to the original Breeders’ Cup schedule which, if all goes according to Hoyle, would result in undefeated career victory 14 on Breeders' Cup day, a modern record for major race horses.
What changed Moss’s mind?
At Monday’s press conference previewing the upcoming 2009 Saratoga racing season, New York Racing Association President Charlie Hayward, playing to the local media, good-humouredly referred to Del Mar as the “minor league Saratoga of the West.”
Sometime later, Chief Operating Officer Hal Handel picked up the ball, lightheartedly identifying Del Mar as “our Triple A affiliate.”
Non-racetrackers who may be reading this need to know: From who’s dating whom, to how many positives any racing department might be stonewalling at the time, there are no secrets on the racetrack.
And for a game that demands a sense of humor from its participants, it’s a bear market. Suddenly, Zenyatta's possible appearance in the Personal Ensign, Ruffian or Beldame doesn’t seems impossible.
Moss has second thoughts now, recalling how his Derby-winning Giacomo freaked out in New York’s despised detention barn, finishing seventh in the 2005 Belmont.
It seems certain that the best way to make a meeting between the two moot is for either filly to step out of their division and meet males, Rachel for a second time.
Should the three-year-old filly beat the Derby and Belmont winners in the Travers, it would be game, set and Horse of the Year match, even if Zenyatta were to win the Breeders’ Cup Classic. Unless, of course, they met after the Breeders’ Cup.
Moss said he would consider meeting Rachel Alexandra somewhere after the Breeders’ Cup. But if she wins #14, that’s unlikely to happen. The bottom line is that Moss and Jackson have to make like Howard and Riddle and find a way to make it happen.
It’s the only race the fans really want to see. If it doesn’t happen, what remains of racing’s image as a sport in this era would take a hit from which it might never recover.


01 Jul 2009 at 07:34 pm | #
I think you might want to add baseball as the dominant sport of their day.
01 Jul 2009 at 09:06 pm | #
That’s right, and the Mets weren’t even playing then.
01 Jul 2009 at 09:24 pm | #
Gentlemen,
No need to, you already did. But now that you mention it, I recall something about the 1927 Yankees. No provincialism, though. LA didn’t have a team then, either.
JP
02 Jul 2009 at 03:54 pm | #
“It’s the only race the fans really want to see” and racing’s image “might never recover”?!? Are you joking?
I’m a fan and there’s a bunch of other races I want to see. And I don’t know anybody outside the racing world clamoring for a Zenyatta-Rachel match-up.
My sister and her husband live in California. I visited them recently and they hosted a barbecue. Most in attendance weren’t horse racing fans so when I mentioned Zenyatta, they didn’t know what I was talking about. And since non-racing-fan California residents don’t know Zenyatta, I’m guessing few outside that state know of her either.
The general public is more aware of Rachel because of the Preakness, but I don’t know any non-racing fans who retained an interest in her career after the Triple series was over.
The only horse I hear non-racing fans still talk about is Mine That Bird. They even ask when he’ll race again because they want to watch. So IMO the only way a Zenyatta-Rachel match-up would generate serious general public interest is if Mine That Bird was also in the race.
02 Jul 2009 at 08:39 pm | #
Hey Mary,
Thanks for posting. Guess I’m spoiled because I live in Saratoga. But whenever anyone stops to chat, they ask me about the fillies not the colts.
As far as racing’s image is concerned, this relates more to the end of the season when, presumably, Breeders’ Cup coverage will make more casual fans aware of the whole H of the Y thing re: the two fillies. That’s when they might begin to ask: “What’s up with that?”
My bad; perhaps I should have made that clear. Meantime, the only race I’m really looking forward to at the moment is the Travers, especially if all the TC horses show up. What’s on your radar?
03 Jul 2009 at 08:44 pm | #
Unfortunately a match between Rachel and Zenyatta doesn’t make much sense for the latter’s camp given the different racing characteristics of both mares. Zenyatta would simply have no chance against a front running, free wheeling filly like Rachel Alexandra no matter what the surface may be. And that doesn’t mean Rachel is a better horse than Zenyatta. For a race between the two to actually make sense and be fair it would have to be in a setup like the BC fillies and mares where there would be at least another 8 or 9 fillies and mares. That however, doesn’t seem likely. Too bad for racing. We can only wonder, what if...?
08 Jul 2009 at 03:21 pm | #
Mike,
Agreed, a match between speed and stamina, one on one, will almost always go to the speed. I believe everyone, including the principals, wants to see a race with, at the very least, four other quality competitors, just to keep things honest. And it is horse racing, so you never know what will happen.
One point on which I disagree. You say that if the advantaged position horse beats its rival, that it doesn’t prove that the winner is the better of the two horses. Then what is the measure if not competition? I was on your side of the argument 30 years ago. Finally, I had to admit that Affirmed was better than Alydar.
Thanks for the post.
08 Jul 2009 at 05:37 pm | #
I agree that the measure of greatness is with no doubt competition. But not
when the horse with the advantage beats you once. Affirmed proved it to you
on 3 different occassions and 3 different distances. It took you too long to
admit greatness. Thanks for your response. Its great to have these
discussions. Only horse people understand this.
10 Jul 2009 at 02:00 am | #
I AGREE with Mary. Regarding the statement “ Its the only race the Fans want to see “.....Listen were not dealing with two chicks with big implanted tools for tuturing the simple minds in mud wrestling .............This is Horse Racing.
Kudos to the Zenyatta Camp for the man, Sherriff, with the license to train this mare is doing just that he is training her and she is responding and the Moss’s are super folks in my mind as being every trainers dream for the owner who listens to the trainer. Unlike Jackson , get a license with your merlot and some cheese with your whine!........!
13 Jul 2009 at 04:40 am | #
Well, if a free-wheeling Rachel should have no problem with Zenyatta, then I’m confused why Rachel’s handlers won’t race in the Breeders since Rachel ran on that surface with no problem. IMO, those in the know KNOWS Rachel would have problem against CLASS!! Zenyatta has won on all kinds of pace. Her 3/8 to 1/8 sprint is second to none! well maybe Afleet Alex.
That said..pulling Rachel out of the Breeders is SAYING A LOT!!
13 Jul 2009 at 11:09 pm | #
HAY JIMMY!!!! I think unfortuantely the connections with CURLIN thought he was invincible. And the owner blames the surface for defeating that horse that day at the BC., in 08. What do you want to bet that Assmussen may not have dabbed in wine, but , he is nowwwwwww!
I prefer that Rachael stay in the 3 yr old division for fillies and if there is anything left of her , go for her 4 yr old year. Perhaps Jackson could take some valuable lessons from the Zenayatta camp.............I like both horses, but , I like the way Zenyatta is being handled in the Racing World.I get chills watching her at the top of the stretch.
15 Jul 2009 at 05:55 am | #
We did an article on the possibility of a Zenyatta/ Rachel Alexandra matchup on our site and quoted your blog. Here is a link to the article.
http://www.casetherace.com/articles/199.html