(CHICAGO, IL – April 12, 2010) The State of New York has been slow in following through on gambling legislation that was passed almost nine years ago. Surprised? Well, you shouldn’t be. Actions requiring the involvement of people in politics rarely live up to their promises. People in politics rarely live up to the image that we have of them.
In any case, under the terms of this legislation, a slots machine casino was to be built at Aqueduct Racetrack. From the gambling revenues produced at the casino, the New York Racing Association was to derive funding to keep horse racing in the State at a high level. None of this happened. After more fits and starts than a baby’s first steps, now the proposition’s at square one as the State itself has lapsed deep into crimson - $9.2 billion short of meeting its obligations.
Without the casino, New York racetracks have entered a meltdown mode. Their fans have been subjected to non-stop reminders of how insufficient the sport is to maintain itself. NYRA, in turn, is approaching its second bankruptcy. Despite dozens of poisoned public notices; bagsful of cash to candidates; committees, town hall meetings and marches to the Capital, and enough stress to stop hundreds of hearts, nothing to change things has happened. Something’s wrong, very wrong, and it’s not only wrong in Albany.
Do horse racing’s top-level managers have a responsibility to achieve the impossible - in other words, to move the State into fulfilling its obligations under the law on a timely basis for the sake of the franchise, the fans and all the people affected by the consequences? Or are current politics so fractured that racetrack executives are owed a pass on failures to convince the State to deliver? This is the kind of discussion that nobody’s having. Looking ahead to when horse racing is socialized sport or no sport at all, will the racecourses require people with different talents than the people who are leading them?
“The most important skill for an executive operating in a quasi-public entity is political instinct,” said Peter Meder, founder of Peter Meder and Company, Inc., a Chicago-based management consulting firm specializing in executive search for such companies as Tenneco, Abbott Labs and McDonald’s. “It’s the job of an executive to identify the revenue stream, and if much of your revenue is coming from the State, you have to know how to operate there. Someone from a utilities business might be a good hire,” he conjectured.
That aside, Meder believes that there are few excuses that relieve managers, even those lacking political clout, from operating within a budget. When it appears that a plan doesn’t shape up as it’s supposed to, “you can’t bail on that,” he argued. “Every business has revenues, a bottom line and a lot of things in between,” Meder proffered. “As long as there are customers, companies can survive," he added. Yet, the customers for horse racing are falling away faster than many people notice.
Although big races (a record crowd of 33,727 for the Blue Grass Stakes), special events (44,973 for Zenyatta’s return) and festivals (61,531 for Oaklawn Park’s Arkansas Derby Day) are able to still draw huge crowds, on days when the wind whistles through an abandoned grandstand and the card is a hodge-podge of drugged-up animals, only die-hard gamblers are interested. And the lack of attention given the sport at the racecourses hasn’t been lost on elected officials who are holding the purse strings.
In recent weeks, NYRA began to address the gap between revenues and the bottom line. But the racecourse operator faces reduced payments from NYC OTB as that entity reinvents itself and, unfortunately, the trimming seems to have come a day late and is a dollar short. In addition, the cuts were initiated after the franchise ran through a one-time infusion of money the State paid to NYRA in return for the racecourse properties, causing many, especially the State comptroller, to wonder just how much taxpayer money is really needed to keep horse racing viable. Alas, what, in the past, was mere brinksmanship is leading to real panic now. It needn’t be that.
When votes are at risk, nothing happens until time to raise money for future campaigns evaporates and the tide begins turning against you. The game’s problems are minute in comparison to issues affecting schools, roads and parks – all areas of concern that are more broadly-realized and removed from the taint of gambling. Propping the pari-mutuels business with public money is a tough sell where money's needed for other crises. Regardless, those who know how politics operate...well, they believe that State funding for horse racing will develop eventually. Book your hotel rooms in Saratoga Springs.
That being the case, the solution that New York State will produce is borrowed time, not long term fixes to the sport’s core irritations. In turn, having benefited from something done hastily on a temporary basis will give license to horse racing’s leaders to return to their business as usual. And if that occurs, a few years from now, once the cosmetic effect of whatever’s been done is done, prepare for more of the unacceptable policies of “who struck John” and “woe is me.”
What the math portends is that NYRA, with its costs at the level they are, can’t sustain purses to the level it has without subsidies. Yet, Susan Bagyura, author of the
The Visionary Leader, a self-help book for executives operating in a time of adversity, advises the industry to escape its reliance on outside forces, no matter the effect of self-realization. Controlling OTB might help matters, but savvy observers doubt NYRA’s will to bring about true change.
“What has happened in the past is in the past. The future can be different,” Bagyura said, hopeful that the horse racing industry is able to see beyond the take on today’s fifth race at Aqueduct. “I understand people will say, ‘No, I am not a victim, this is just reality,’” Bagyura observed. The professional life coach - a cheerleader of sorts - expressed little admiration for leaders who refuse to accept responsibility. “That’s a victim’s game,” she said.
Vic Zast posts something new each day on Facebook.com and Twitter.com.
12 Apr 2010 at 04:30 am | #
Well said. Churchill Downs seems to have the right formula--diversification, internet business, shares sold on the stock exchange, innovation.
12 Apr 2010 at 07:32 am | #
Churchill has the right formula, huh? What does Churchill give to its fans beyond the Derby and its innovative Twin Spires wagering site? If you are actually a NY Breeder I can promise you that you are the stupidest person in the room. Well, maybe the second stupidest - but only if Zast is in that room.
12 Apr 2010 at 07:43 am | #
When Macy’s does not do so well with its products,
it lowers the price, takes flyers out and advertises a sale.
And they do it repeatedly to get into the customer’s consciousness. In doing so Macy’s creates regular customers who will come again and again to shop for quality at bargain prices.
They will most probably not be bothered with things they do not need. In racing’s case: slots.
Horse racing must become self-sufficient again.
So let’s start with lowering the pricing.
12 Apr 2010 at 08:48 am | #
Racing will never, ever be self sufficient again. There are too many other gambling options. Slots are a lifeline to an industry whose roots in the past possibly no longer entitle it to be tied to slot machine subsidies, I’m not sure. But without slots, the industry is officially dead.
12 Apr 2010 at 08:53 am | #
Joey’s right; Churchill is no longer a racing company. It’s an internet betting and slot-machine company with a few race tracks attached. Their concern for the horsemen who put on the show is, well, just ask the horsemen at Calder.
That said, what can Charlie Hayward, Hal Handel and the rest of the crew at NYRA do? Cutting prices (i.e., takeout) might help in the long run, but the effect is certainly unproven, and would probably cut into revenue in the short run. Cutting purses will gradually drive the better racing to Monmouth and elsewhere, and we’ll end up with Belmont race cards looking like mid-February at Aqueduct—a card full of maiden claimers, 2- and 3-lifetime claimers, and NY-breds. Is that a model that will attract customers nationwide (by far the largest part of NYRA’s handle comes from simulcast sites? I suspect not.
AS for a visionary leader who understands state government, nice idea, but if you truly understand how incredibly venal and incompetent the current NY state government is, you might conclude that no one could get us out of the morass. Better marketing, innovation, budget cutting, sure. Those are necessary, but, at this stage, far from sufficient.
Guess I sound kinda depressed. Well, that might be a sane response to an insane, untenable situation.
12 Apr 2010 at 09:14 am | #
A visonary leader??
One name comes to mind:
Wendell M Corrow
12 Apr 2010 at 01:11 pm | #
Vic, as a former employee of NYRA, let me enlighten you a bit. NYRA was and still is very politically connected, only this time they are not listening.
12 Apr 2010 at 02:29 pm | #
Vic,
NYRA tried to go the political route...don’t you remember? Threatening that the Belmont Stakes and Saratoga were in jeopardy this year. What they got was a trashing from NY legislators and an audit from the State Comptroller. NYRA is working behind the scenes and will utimately get fixed. The VLT situation has been used by legislators to pump up their collective political coffers. Since the AEG selection is now viewed as a scam..it should lead to NYRA getting a VLT vendor named in the next few months and resulting in them getting financial house in order. That not to say that NYRA hasn’t exactly operated in an efficient manner...giving all the executive huge bonuses as you are losing tens of millions of dollars probably was a mistake. It should all get corrected in the near future.
13 Apr 2010 at 06:23 am | #
#4 ace wrote:
Slots are a lifeline to an industry ...
Or it could be a ghostly crutch that provokes those in the industry to bark up the wrong tree.
Horse racing is far overpriced when compared to other forms of gaming.
Until the business models are corrected, racing will continue to be in a coma with or without slots.
13 Apr 2010 at 07:26 am | #
If the Aqueduct casino revenues come to fruition, they will serve as a temporary lifeline to New York racing. But it’s a mistake to believe that casino revenues can serve as a dependable factor in an ongoing business model. The decline in horse racing’s popularity will be accompanied by a further disinclination of the States to budget taxpayer’s money for purposes of supporting the sport.
Horse racing as gaming may be over-priced. But as entertainment, it’s inexpensive. Prices for the Kentucky Derby, Breeders’ Cup and other marquee events are high and yet these are the best attended. In other countries, the price for attending the races is much higher than it is here, even for routine weekend programs.
13 Apr 2010 at 10:58 am | #
VZ,
For a moment I thought Empire Racing Associates was making a comeback. Besides belittling NYRA’s belated belt-tightening, what else have you got to bash the Ha-Ha management team with? Seriously, how can you justify painting NYRA and NYCOTB with the same brush?
It sounds as if you’re endorsing Governor Paterson’s reported dismissal of NYRA’s role in a proposal by Assemblyman Pretlow intended to address both the long-term and short-term problems of NYCOTB in a more realistic fashion than did “Frucher’s Fantasy”—a widely discredited prior plan by Paterson’s minister of patronage whom he appointed after taking Mayor Bloomberg off the hook.
It also seems as though your Saratoga sinecure is safe for another season as it should be for summers to come. It would not surprise me to see downstate tracks shuttered as former NYCOTB patrons continue to bet on races run elsewhere and view them from anywhere else. Hopefully you will still continue searching for serious solutions to these same problems in the social stratosphere of upstate New York.
13 Apr 2010 at 11:25 am | #
Self bet kiosks in sports bars in NYC is one innovative suggestion that has been made to replace unprofitable NYCOTB branches. Capital OTB has about 25 plus 10 kiosks in bowling alleys, Nassau OTB about 10, Suffolk about 13 and Western NY OTB about 25. Why not NYC? Sports bar fans may become attracted to our sport. However, I heard that Assemblyman Silver opposes them. I do not know why.
13 Apr 2010 at 12:25 pm | #
Mostly, I’m trying to get people who refuse to see outside the box to venture outside their comfort zones. Horse racing can’t remain without significant change and prosper over the long term. Sometimes I get the idea that the sport’s leaders are just trying to run out their terms, make it easy on themselves.
Notwithstanding the remarks passed along earlier by Joey B, the comments to this column indicate clearly that intelligence and creativity reside as attributes of the faithful, if not the establishment. You don’t want to read and/or challenge the same things you see elsewhere over and again on HorseRaceInsider.com. Do you?
13 Apr 2010 at 04:30 pm | #
Zast- I suggest you do some research before you pontificate about the state of horseracing. Here, I’ll give you a few topics to focus on: review the handle figures since the 1980s, the role television has played in the growth/ social relevance of US sports leagues, the introduction of simulcasting in the 70s, and the fan participation shift from on track to off track.
Here is an idea for a future zast blog story. . . maybe you can list all of the ways YOU have helped this game. Do you think you will be able to come up with anything of significance? Doubt it. You throw these ridiculous ideas around without ever considering whether these could ever be implemented. You play a convenient game of connect the dots but you have a limited understanding of reality. .. or is that just thinking outside of the BOX???
you are fraudulent, Mister Victor Zast
13 Apr 2010 at 07:10 pm | #
From the above comments, I culled the following statements: From Mr. Zast: a)"What the math portends is that NYRA can’t sustain purses to the level it has without subsidies,” and b) “In recent weeks NYRA began to address the gap between revenues and the bottom line.”
NYRA hasn’t returned a dime to the state in a decade; and purses have been funded, not from income derived from takeout on handle or signal fees, but from state loans, forgiveness of debt, and ‘borrowing’ from the horsemen’s purse account; and it is NYRA’s hope that they will be able to fund future purses from slot revenue, giving the bottom line no consideration whatsoever. The finding that purses cannot be sustained was obvious ten years ago; that NYRA is now paying attention to the bottom line is the result of their now having no choice.
Mr. Zorn comments, “cutting purses will gradually drive the better racing to Monmouth or elsewhere.” Sure owners and trainers, people who enter the racetrack from the backstretch not through the front gate, will go where they believe their horses can run and win for a larger purse; but, just what is ‘better’ racing?
Will the people entering a racetrack through the front entrance actually see a difference? or have they been programmed to think so?
The_Knight_Sky comments, “Until the business models are correct ...,” and “Horse racing is far overpriced ...’”. Just what is a business model? particularly as it applies to racing; and takeout rates are not in anyway the main reason racing is tanking.
So just what is the problem racing faces? It is the perception that the public has of the industry, garnered from the commentary the marketing wing of the industry has thrust upon the public over the years? Who is the marketing wing? TURF WRITERS!
Do fans go to baseball games at all of the major league ballparks in the country? Do fans go to all the NFL football games? All the NHL games? All the NBA games? Are not most of the games played before huge crowds, no matter the team’s record? Now, why is this? It is because the marketing wing of these leagues of sport teams has not impressed upon the public that certain teams are unworthy of their attention.
Turf writers have decided, years ago, that Thoroughbred racing is represented by a select few racetracks, owners, trainers, and jockeys; that just a handful of racetracks are worthy of public attention, and that all the other racetracks offer inferior racing, unworthy of anyone’s attention; that racing is better at these few racetracks, and the public is wasting their time going to small racetracks - the number one problem facing racing; and all the while ignoring the real and only reason people even give racing a second look - the opportunity to gamble and have a great time. What is mind-boggling is that most of these small racetracks are now very modern, with pristine facilities.
“Pay it again Sam”: There is no difference between a $5,000 claiming race and a stake race; both involve horses running around a racetrack.
Racing at any racetrack is exciting and offers pretty much the same gambling opportunities as Saratoga or Santa Anita; and, the true attraction is the opportunity to gamble, not the horse.
14 Apr 2010 at 03:06 am | #
wmcorrow’s last line is correct.” The true attraction is the opportunity to gamble,not the horse.” Racing has never been marketed this way. Most bettors have never learned that there is a chance you can beat the game over the long haul.
Poker’s has marketed its game,and has used television to show people various personalities.{Doyle Brunson,Phil Ivey,etc.]
Racing has no personality. People watching telecasts don’t care about millionaire owners.
Where is Harvey Pack,when you need him ?
14 Apr 2010 at 09:31 am | #
Aaron,
Racing is still hiding itself from the world through TV, but even if it weren’t – in order to attract NEW fans—it would still need to show PEOPLE who talked out loud as they handicapped (while also showing the data they were marking up), analyzed the tote board, compared selections with public selectors, constructed tickets, and reviewed payoffs, replays, selection results, etc. In other words, show horseplayers winning as opposed to just winning horseplayers.
15 Apr 2010 at 08:38 am | #
First and foremost. Get government completely out of owning and ciontrolling the tracks and let the free market prevail! NYRA/OTB, NJSEA, it doesn’t matter where or what! Government cannot run what should be a private enterprise.
Secondly: NYRA and others have to get their heads out of their collective rears when it comes to the new technolgy and what it offers.
Like it or not, Internet wagering and rebate shops are here to stay! Embrace it! When an entity as cash strapped as NYRA chooses to ignore millions in handle which equates to more income, there is something really wrong with that picture.
The old timers and purists worry about this, but the fact is it’s not going away. If a rebate shop or internet wagering outlet is willing to be investigated and adhere to the conditions set forward by the tracks and states, if they are transparent in every aspect of their operation and use a boni-fide tote vendor as their conduit, then for God’s Sake! The tracks should take the money and run. As an example. what if a rebate shop is being charged 6% for the NYRA signal. That shop in turn averages $500,000 a day in handle. That’s $30,00 a day the track did not have. equates to a good overnite purse or two dosn’t it?
OTB is, has been and always will be a parasite! Again, now owned by the government and as always, a dumping ground for political hacks and favorites to “augment” their already outrageous, unearned incomes! Let it go away and start over correctly.
15 Apr 2010 at 08:47 am | #
Sorry!
I meant $30,000 a day in track fees from the example I gave. that’s $150,000 on a five day race week! That’s not chicken feed!
15 Apr 2010 at 11:28 am | #
JB,
Don’t kid yourself! Rebate shops do not create more handle for a racetrack; that money would have been wagered someplace else regardless. What rebate shops do is cheat our breeders out of money they would have received had these wagers been placed with a legitimate wagering outfit - one that is obligated to deliver a portion of the revenue generated to breeders. That is obviously lost on Pricci and his merry men. Take a look at this site!!!! They’ve basically prostituted themselves for some pocket change. They permit rebate shops like BELMONT.COM to advertise on the site. They all want to do right by the game, but they refuse to look in the mirror!!! A bunch of hypocrites.
16 Apr 2010 at 08:18 am | #
Joey B,
Not all rebate shops are as you state. if you look at my post, I stateted as follows.
If a rebate shop or internet wagering outlet is willing to be investigated and adhere to the conditions set forward by the tracks and states, if they are transparent in every aspect of their operation and use a boni-fide tote vendor as their conduit, then for God’s Sake! The tracks should take the money and run.
I speak from experience and involvement!
Anyone who has seen my rants and raves, as well as Pricci’s know we look at all angles before we comment on something.
Fact: There is more handle if the rebate shops particiapate! Fact: The legitiamate ones ( there’s only really two completely vetted operations of that ilk out there) normally pay higher track fees for the product then the tracks or parlors.
The problems in Ny, NJ and elsewhere are the same. To much intervention and out right theft form state entities, to much patronage and cronyism and most of all to much hanging their heads and begging for help from track managements, from the time the first lottery kicked in rather, then trying to help themselves. themselves!
I could go on and on, but the fact remains the same. It is now a different world then what I grew up in as to the sport. Tracks need to use every means available to the. This includes tv and advertising. The problem will continue until the tracks take responsibility as well as the states.
One last thing as to the rebate shops. In NYRA’s case, if they accepted monies from a shop under the conditions as I state. 1,500,00 a week is conservative . That’s 7.5 million a year! When you are facing bankruptcy, you grab the money. Talk about the height of hypocrisy! NYRA is it in every sense!