As an aside, I never did buy into the canard that a Triple Crown champion is all racing needs to reinvigorate itself, not any more than a Zenyatta-Rachel Alexandra Armageddon would be a panacea for the sport's myriad problems. Whether it's showdowns or slot machines, racing is going to be in the short-term fix business for a long time.
Jackson and his trainer, Steve Asmussen, are taking more time about revealing Rachel Alexandra's next race. Last week, a few days before his Preakness winner won the Mother Goose at Belmont Park, Jackson reeled off at least five possibilities down the road, including two mixed-gender options, the Haskell at Monmouth Park and the Travers at Saratoga.
We're not talking about mere division titles here, we're talking Horse of the Year. Rachel Alexandra has more wiggle room than Zenyatta in this regard. She has already won a Triple Crown race. beating the Kentucky Derby winner, and her wins over other fillies have been off the charts. Should Jackson's filly beat males a second time, the balloting for the big prize could be a foregone conclusion, assuming the two fillies don't meet. There have been times when Eclipse voters have penalized horses for skipping the Breeders' Cup, but two wins over males would negate that quibble. What is more, I don't sense much backlash against Jackson for eschewing the surfaces California horses must run on.
But there's one other what-if: Suppose Zenyatta wins a Classic devoid of Rachel Alexandra? Voters' quandary sets in, that's what.
I don't think Zenyatta can afford to lose from here on out. Depending on the circumstances, Rachel Alexandra has margin for error. The best thing for racing might be for Zenyatta to somehow get beat at Del Mar. That might take the edge off their theoretical rivalry, but it might also force Moss to leave California and find Rachel Alexandra.
Jackson's position is not unlike the stand he took with Curlin a year ago, when the post-Triple Crown clamor was for a race between the 2007 Horse of the Year and Big Brown, the Derby-Preakness winner. In so many words, Jackson said, "Here's my horse, here's the race, come and get him." Curlin might have even gone to France, for the Arc de Triomphe, but he failed his only grass test at Belmont. He and Big Brown never did land in the same starting gate. Jackson had the reigning champion, and could afford to hold his ground. It paid off with a second national title for Curlin. This time, maybe Jackson figures he has the champion pro tem. The way Rachel Alexandra's been blowing the doors off the opposition, it's really her title to lose.
So far, Jackson has kept his baiting to a minimum. "They'll have to come East, or some neutral track," he said last week. "But I can't criticize another owner for protecting his horse."
Let's say both fillies sweep whatever races they have left, prior to the Breeders' Cup. Would that prompt Jackson, in a change of mind, to bring his filly West? I doubt it. "Belmont Park is a great track," he said recently. "It ranks with Santa Anita," he added, and then he caught himself. ". . . In its former days," he said.

