Combining the efforts of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Sherlock Holmes' last remaining brother, Interpol, Geraldo Rivera and an old Geiger counter that I found in my garage, I have been able to locate the only two voters who didn't vote for Cigar for Horse of the Year in 1995. Both have sworn on a stack of American Racing Manuals that they erred in filling out their ballots. They deny that the names of the horses Thunder Gulch and Northern Spur were written in their handwriting on their ballots. Their alternate excuse is that they had a spelling lapse.
I expect the Eclipse Awards, ex post facto, reductio ad absurdum, will obtain affidavits from the voters in question, give them Rorschach and polygraph tests and reverse their votes in favor of Cigar. At last the heirs of Allen Paulson will have closure. At last Bill Mott can dedicate himself to a more worthwhile crusade. Racing's second most glaring injustice will have been reconciled. The first? In 1981, when John Henry was credited with all the Horse of the Year votes. There's been a rumor kicking around for years that one voter, who is still living, meant to vote for Pleasant Colony.
This was in the day of paper ballots--you know, like the kind they use in Florida. It was a complicated process: They printed the ballots, mailed them out to the voters, gave them a deadline to return them and turned over the rest to an overpriced accounting firm in New York. It was impossible, unless you filled out your ballot by candlelight, to mistake one horse for another. Now, high tech has taken over. There's no paper, no waste, no concerns about poor handwriting--and the opportunity for one addled voter to vote for Icon Project instead of Zenyatta in the older-female division. It was a big deal, apparently, for Zenyatta to get all the votes in her class, as Rachel Alexandra did in hers, so the voter repented and the Eclipse committee took away Icon Project's vote. Damn. The next time I saw Marty Wolfson, Icon Project's trainer, I wanted to ask him if he had a relative with an Eclipse vote.
The National Thoroughbred Racing Association, which oversees the Eclipse voting, mainly because the other sponsors, the Racing Form and the National Turf Writers, want nothing to do with it, must think that electronic voting is easier, but what's overlooked is this: Just because turf writers can read a Racing Form doesn't mean they're deft with computers. I struggle with my electronic vote every year, hoping I don't hit the wrong button at the wrong time, and I know a number of colleagues who are just as klutzy. One of them called me on a Sunday this year, the day before the balloting deadline, to have me walk him through the process. It was the blind leading the blind, from flag fall to finish. I finally gave him the 800 number for the Homework Hotline.
I don't know why they don't give the electorate three voting options: The old mailed paper ballots for us Neanderthals, fax submissions for those of us who finished eighth grade, and the electronic method for those under age 55. We forget what strides the Post Office has made with ZIP codes. The Baseball Writers Association of America, which runs the Baseball Hall of Fame election, has a tight voting window, like the Eclipses, and manages with far less furor. The deadline for the Baseball Hall of Fame vote is only a week before they announce which players have passed muster, and I can't ever recall a voting snafu. They do fax and snail mail, no computers. "Some of these guys," said Jack Lang, the late secretary-treasurer of the baseball writers, "send in their votes on the backs of matchbook covers. But as long as we can read 'em, we count 'em."
This time, 14% of the eligible Eclipse electorate either didn't bother to vote or couldn't cope with the system. That's not enough to spoil a good dinner. A good dinner, that is, that was a rumor for two and a half hours after everyone was seated in Beverly Hills. That might explain why Kenny Rice, the master of ceremonies, was playing to such a tough house. The invitations should tell everyone to have a late lunch.
Recently, the Eclipse dinner was held in Miami Beach, on a night when the meal was also slow in coming, and the waiters, under strict orders, wouldn't even part with rolls and butter to go with everybody's water. A creative starveling dialed Domino's and had several pies delivered to his table. Salivating people at nearby tables asked him to name his price for a slice, but there wasn't enough pizza to go around. It would have been a grand night for that old loaves-and-fishes stunt.
24 Jan 2010 at 10:02 am | #
“...Just because turf writers can read a Racing Form doesn’t mean they’re deft with computers.”
Bill: I think you should have said “...Just because SOME turf writers can read a Racing Form doesn’t mean they’re deft with computers.”! I suppose that MOST turf writers can read the Form, but there are some who seem completely clueless! There is one writer for a newspaper I read online who couldn’t pick an empty seat in Yankee Stadium...TODAY! I have seen articles in various racing newspapers and magazines which discuss the likely winners in stakes races, and none of the mentioned competitors even hit the board! daily selections as if I think writers who make suggestions to the racing public are deceiving people who put their trust in them by failing to keep up with hot young sires. Check some of the payoffs in last year’s wins by offspring of Pollard’s Vision, for just one example. I’m sure there are better examples, but that is a good one!
24 Jan 2010 at 10:06 am | #
It’s fairly obvious that I’m not deft with computers, either! Somehow, almost certainly my clumsiness with the keyboard, a few lines in my earlier message were garbled, but that’s okay; so is my thought process!
02 Mar 2010 at 01:47 am | #
I would appreciate an honest answer not from someone(Pat) who says to go read the constitution cause obviously I did and I am still stuck, so I would appreciate some honest helpLas Vegas delivery service