Churchill Downs and arrogance have been in lockstep for a long, long time. At a Kentucky Derby in the 1970s, I ran into Jesse Outlar, the respected sports editor of the Atlanta Constitution, at a Louisville hotel bar several days before the race. "Jesse, is it me or are you down in the dumps for some reason?" I said. "I left my press credentials in Atlanta," said Jesse, who was as hangdog as a basset hound. "Now I've got to go up to Raymond Johnson tomorrow morning and tell him. You know Raymond. He's not going to let me off without a tongue-lashing. I'll get the replacement credentials, but not until Raymond accuses me of double-dipping him."
Johnson was the former sports editor of a Nashville newspaper, but as a PR man for Churchill that didn't mean he had to like newspapermen anymore. Churchill had hired him for what became known as its resident (one word, one syllable, rhymes with trick), and Raymond overplayed the assignment. There's been a lengthy list of successors since Raymond left the track, some of them resident (one word, one syllable, rhymes with tricks) who continued on in the Johnson tradition. Edgar Allen, a beautiful man, was an exception to this prerequisite contempt for the media, and so was Tony Terry, but Tony's 24/7 niceness seemed to rub the front office the wrong way, and he was gone, not willingly, after a long career with the company.
In 1988, as they were loading Winning Colors and the others into the Derby starting gate, I was standing in the second row of the two-row terrace in front of the press box at Churchill. I had had the same location for years, and while it was not the best viewing area for the Derby, if you stood and used binoculars, you could still see the horses leaving the chute at the start of the race.
Seconds before the break, a security guard about the size of Winning Colors got in my face and told me I'd have to sit down because the people behind me could not see. I glanced over my shoulder and saw most of the members of Interlopers Inc., a varied collection of yokels who didn't belong. They were standing in a non-existent third row.
"These people don't even have credentials," I said to the bozo who was asking me to sit down and miss the start of the race. "I came all the way from California to watch a mile and a quarter. You'll have to carry me out of here if you don't like it."
"Well, that's just what we might have to do," he said.
"Before you leave, could you give me the name of someone who can have you fired?"
"That would be God," he said, finally backing off.
Writing about that Derby was the easy part. The next day, I broached the incident with Karl Schmitt, who could have been joined at the hip with Raymond Johnson. Most of us are familiar with complaining to someone in charge and knowing that the someone isn't listening to one word we've said. This was Karl Schmitt, in spades. Karl made the corporate rounds at Churchill Downs, was eventually made a vice president (whenever Churchill's vice president roster dips under a dozen, the guys at the top feel understaffed), and at least once a day would answer a question with, "That's not in my department." After a while, I began asking, "Just exactly what
is his department?" I never got an answer.
The same year the Gestapo-like rent-a-cop didn't want me to see whether Winning Colors broke right, Mike Battaglia was the track announcer at Churchill. Early on Derby day, between races, Mike went to the roof to do a TV interview. He left his coat, with the credential attached, in the booth, and you probably know what's coming. The interview over, Battaglia returned to the booth to call the next race, but was told that he couldn't get in because he didn't have a credential. Keeneland went silent for years, but this was Derby day, for cripes' sake.
I swear, I haven't been writing these down. In 1982, I watched in horror as the great Joe Hirsch and a rent-a-cop outside trainer Dewey Smith's barn engaged in an ugly chest-bumping episode. Smith, sitting in his office, heard the commotion and came outside. "What the hell's wrong with you, man?" he said. "This is Joe Hirsch. Do you think he'd try to get in to see me if I didn't want him?"
Mixing arrogance and ignorance makes for a rancid combination. By my count, there are currently 13 vice presidents at Churchill, most of whom probably don't know Jorge Velasquez from John Velazquez, or Ron Franklin from Ron McAnally. Security guards weren't a problem at this Derby for Jorge Velasquez and Franklin, but tickets were. The two retired riders were invited to Louisville, to add their handprints in cement to the prints of 31 other Derby-winning jockeys. The impressive display is outside the Galt House, which not incidentally is Churchill's official Derby hotel. Organizers notified Churchill three weeks before the Derby that Velasquez and Franklin were coming, and that they hoped to buy four good seats for them and their companions, as they had in each of the three previous years for other jockeys.
On Derby day, despite numerous attempts by Jane Dempsey to buy the tickets, Velasquez and Franklin were relegated to watching the race from the bar of their hotel. The fifth race on the Derby undercard was named the Pleasant Colony Purse, in honor of the horse Velasquez rode to victory in the 1981 Derby. Dempsey is not exactly a jane-come-lately to the Derby milieu. From California, she and her family have run an annual Kentucky Derby junket for 64 years. Forget that it's the Derby, wouldn't you think that 64 years of doing business with anybody earns you a return phone call?
"I'm not angry," Dempsey said. "I'm very angry."
In the closest thing to an apology to the embarrassed Velasquez and Franklin, one of the Churchill vice presidents said, "We should have known (about Velasquez and Franklin), and we didn't." It's not as though this hasn't happened before. In 2006, Johnny Sellers, of Carry Back fame, was an invitee, along with Babe Hanford, who rode Bold Venture to victory in 1936. Sellers took ill, and spent the Derby in a Louisville hospital, but it wouldn't have made any difference, they couldn't buy him a ticket. Hanford and his wife, both elderly, said it was just as well that they weren't issued tickets, because they no longer handled big crowds well. Inadvertently, the Hanfords got Churchill off the hook. Three years later, Babe Hanford, age 91, died. Churchill Downs put out a release that said he had attended his last Derby in 2006. Not quite. He was in Louisville, but was a ticket short of going to the track.
This year, Diane Crump would have liked to have gone to the Derby. Crump was trampled by a horse last year, suffered head injuries and incurred substantial debt. She hasn't been to Churchill Downs in 15 years, and this was the 40th anniversary of her becoming the first female jockey to ride in the race. According to Jason Neff, who's doing a documentary on female jockeys, Churchill knew more than a month before the Derby that Crump had this anniversary and was interested in attending. NBC might have interviewed her. Newspapers covering the Derby might have shown interest. But a complimentary ticket couldn't be found, and at the end of the day Crump, according to Neff, was invited to buy her own ticket on the Internet.
"I'm not bitter, just disappointed," Crump said on the phone from Northern Virginia. "It would have been fun to go, but this is racing isn't it? I was more disappointed for Velasquez and Franklin. Money is the only thing driving the game. Nobody in management knows anymore about the people and the great horses who made the game. Tradition doesn't count for anything. Yes, I know, betting drives the game, and it wouldn't be much of a game without the betting. But it's the people in the game who drive the betting, and the tracks have forgotten about them."
Which is not to say that the tracks don't have time to forget the fans. Churchill Downs has this rule about no umbrellas on Derby day. They probably roll out extra Dumpsters when it rains, to collect all the contraband. Mix arrogance and ignorance, season with a lack of common sense, and the smell is like being downwind at a landfill. A few years ago, a friend of mine witnessed this at the entrance to Churchill on Derby day: A woman was asked to surrender her umbrella. She pleaded that this was a special umbrella. Her son had used it for years, they always talked about it, and when he died, the umbrella wound up in the mother's hands. The mother with the dead son cried as she told the story. The umbrella police were unmoved. Into the Dumpster, the bumbershoot went.
08 May 2010 at 11:12 pm | #
Glad to know your rant continues. Will we be subjected to this for the rest of 2010?
09 May 2010 at 01:07 am | #
Great job Bill. Keep it up. The more they complain, the more you have to keep putting it to them.
09 May 2010 at 03:39 am | #
Bill,
“But it’s the people in the game who drive the betting,” said the first woman to ride in the Kentucky Derby.
There is no room for respecting the past in corporate America. This quaint notion is now reserved only for the titled chain of command.
Ace,
If you’re an HRI regular, you’re familiar with Bill and his work. In that context, why the sarcasm?
Thanks Bill. Good job, per usual.
JRP
09 May 2010 at 05:54 am | #
I lived in Louisville for 12 years and never missed a Derby.
One thing I do not miss is the way they treat their employees and the paying customers…
They have the airline mentality..treat them like cattle...there will always be somebody else to come to the track…
I could tell you several (dumpster stories)....
09 May 2010 at 06:30 am | #
No sarcasm was intended JRP, just wondering what the purpose of beating up Churchill Downs is. Did Bill’s seats come late this year?
There is your sarcasm.
09 May 2010 at 07:02 am | #
Ace,
Just thought the story spoke for itself. And Bill had too much class to relate that a CDI VEEP sent an e-mail accusing him of non-professionalism. I think as a dual Eclipse Award winner and 17 years with the LA Times speaks to his credentials. There is no agenda at work except perhaps a cautionary tale that the industry, not just CDI, could do a better job showing respect for the people that helped make the sport what it is.
Thanks,
JP
09 May 2010 at 09:07 am | #
I love Bill, and I have said it on this board, but the bashing seems...unseemly.
09 May 2010 at 10:37 am | #
Just what does Churchill Downs’ management owe retired jockeys? As reported by turf writers, it appeared that Churchill was callous, arrogant, and basically indifferent to what retired jockeys have accomplished during their careers. Churchill’s decision to deny tickets to jockeys was deemed shameful.
It should be noted and understood that jockeys are not employees of Churchill Downs or any other racetrack; they are self-employed and can chose to ride when and where they want, usually following the money. The best jockeys are hired to be up on a horse by trainers, who have as much loyalty to a racetrack as a cat has to the person who feeds him.
On a given Saturday or Sunday the best trainers and jockeys are scattered across the country chasing the purse money. Racetracks offer a meet, present a condition book, and hope that they will attract the supposedly best horses and trainers, yet the best trainers and jockeys get to chose where they will go - so much for loyalty to a certain racetrack.
Things have changed. No longer is an employee given a gold watch for thirty or fifty years of employment at a company. Today, it is a two-way street: employees following the money also, changing jobs six to eight times during their lifetime; and employers have no qualms to fire and employee with thirty years of service, preferring a newly employed person doing the same job for far less cost in benefits - that is simply the way it is. The focus is now on the bottom-line.
If there were a word that could describe why racing is in decline, I would suggest the word tradition.
I side with Churchill Downs.
09 May 2010 at 11:11 am | #
Churchill and other tracks frequently use jockeys to promote the game (bobbleheads, autograph sessions, charity causes, etc.). A few winters ago, Santa Anita’s promotional theme for the entire meet revolved around the jockey. Much of the time, jockeys contribute their time and names to these promotions without monetary reward. Sure, jockeys are independent contractors and go whichever way the wind is blowing, but that’s just the nature of the system. In the final analysis, I’d say that jockeys give at least as much as they receive in promoting the game.
As for tradition, that’s a key word in this discussion. Diane Crump mentioned tradition during her interview.
I’ve gone way back over the names of the jockeys who have won the Derby, and can find only one who might have been unwilling to promote the game, either while still active or after they retired. That would be Bill Hartack. And even Hartack had agreed, reluctantly, to come to Louisville and have his handprints added to the rest of the Derby jockeys. His only stipulation was that he not go to Churchill or attend the race. His bitterness about Churchill endured. Hartack died a few months before he got to Louisville for the handprint ceremony.
09 May 2010 at 11:31 am | #
Wendell, the best friend a selling plater ever had and now champion of the upperdog.
I love this game!
JP
09 May 2010 at 02:14 pm | #
Mr. Pricci: Like your use of the word plater. No, I am not a champion of the upperdog. Sometimes the truth hurts, as some people find hard to accept when they hold an opposing view.
Anyway, just what to heck does whether retired jockeys get recognition and tickets to an ‘event’ have to do with increasing racing’s popularity, racetrack attendance, handle, and us lowlifes cashing tickets?
09 May 2010 at 04:20 pm | #
John, another well written and information filled column. Being a long time horseplayer well into my senior years I must tell you of my first time Derby visit. 2009 was my first and last visit to CD for the Derby, after 50 years of horseplaying I was awarded two tickets to the 2009 Derby. The crowds were great but the Gestapo were more than I could take. The price of food and drink were beyond my means. The so called VPs should take a lesson from the VPs at Augusta National or the Indy 500 on how patrons have a direct line to their bottom line. Just lead me to my local OTB or better yet I’ll do my wagering on line. Keep the words flowing about this fine sport.
09 May 2010 at 10:28 pm | #
JP,
The term, “uberdog,” comes to mind as CDI continues to acquire racing and bet-taking venues as well as their own tote company. Slowly, but surely (and silently) they are applying a python’s stranglehold on the nation’s thoroughbred wagering handle.
The piece of the wagering pie coveted by horsemen and horseplayer alike will soon disappear into the pockets of CDI shareholders. To those who would support the installation of slots at Churchill as well as Calder and Fair Grounds, we’ve seen this movie before. It was called “Robo-Cop.”
BC,
So far the “uberdog” is only arrogantly ignoring retired jockeys, not ignorantly arresting them. Messrs. Velasquez and Franklin should be relieved that the track only wanted their handprints ad not their fingerprints in the manner Mr. Baeza experienced in error (and probably terror). The clowns who put on that show are still unapologetically running the three-track circus called NYRA.
Half-a$$ed does not begin to adequately describe that infamous deed. The testicular fortitude exhibited by track executives that day did not even resemble that of a ridging I remember running at Saratoga called Ring Twice. Maybe NY State taxpayers should think twice—and then again—before funding either NYRA or NYCOTB any further based on promises of repayment without extensive executive accountability and results-based compensation. Is it possible the citizens of Saratoga and surrounding areas could raise the money to finance the upcoming Saratoga meet with bonds using the racetrack as collateral?
10 May 2010 at 01:25 am | #
Gee whiz Jim G I’m sure sorry you didn’t have the right color wristband to get where you wanted to go and couldn’t afford the food at the Derby. Try going to the Super Bowl whiner.
Not having enough money is no excuse to indict a venue.
10 May 2010 at 06:29 am | #
Bill,
Fabulous column. Yuo already know my stand on this issue, especially on the diane Crump thing, a classy lady as proven by her statements. WCM and ACE, only one thing here. What does Churchill own the retired jockeys. I’ve said this a million times and I’ll keep saying it. Churchill and all other tracks owe their success to those very people they choose to vilify and/or ignore. This is part of the history and the legend that is Churchill Downs, whetehr the corporate morons in charge like it or not!
Think about it. How many casual fans even know the names of the people who have run churchill downs over the years? A handful? However. people around the world know the jockeys trainers and horses.
As in politics and most other endeavors in life, when an entity loses track of their history and heritage, they should be brought to task. Keep bashing away Bill! As you say, arrogance like Churchill’s is part of what is in fact destroying our sport. And those who refuse to learn from history will be doomed by it. Our history in this industry is rich and deep. The fact that people like tose at churchill choose to ignore it is disgusting!
One aside here. I’m really looking forward to Friday and the Lady’s Legend Race at Pimlico. I truly wish Diane Could have also ridden. Once again, thanks for allowing my comments in your last post on this race. And for all of you out there, please note that this race is also supporting an extremely worthy cause. I’m sure any help will be deeply appreciated.
10 May 2010 at 10:54 am | #
Just one last thought here. I stumbled across this today in the Paulick Report.
From the Paulick Report: “The Los Angeles Dodgers today announced that Zenyatta, the wildly popular undefeated thoroughbred horse who calls Los Angeles home, will be the newest high-profile Angeleno featured in the 2010 “This Is My Town,” Dodgers marketing campaign.”
I find it quite interesting that the L.A. Dodgers have apparently adopted Zenyatta as one of their own.
This supports my premise that there are things in racing, like the Derby, the jockeys, trainers and horses that transcend racing itself. The fact that the Dodgers are smart enough to capitalize on this while racing itself doesn’t is certainly baffling to say the least. Churchill and others can learn a lesson here if they actually cared about anything other then the bottom line.
11 May 2010 at 04:26 am | #
JB: You comment, “Churchill Downs and other racetracks owe their success to those people they choose to vilify and/or ignore ...”. Really?
IMO Churchill Downs and other racetracks owe their success me, and other gamblers like me.
No jockey or thoroughbred was the reason I went to a racetrack back in the fifties or today. I go to the racetrack to gamble, no other reason whatsoever.
As I have stated at this website numerous times already, Thoroughbred racing had a captive audience until cement trucks started rolling into Atlantic City to build casinos. Since 1980 racing has been in a steady decline, yet many turf writers and commentators at this website continue to hold to the opinion that racing’s attraction is everything other than the ability to gamble.
Visualize just how many racetracks would still be operating if they were not receiving revenue from slot machines or casino dole.
So, why did people suddenly depart the racetrack and head for casinos if racing was so grand?
It is so damn obvious that I simply can’t believe that so many people who say they love the history and the social aspects existing at a handful of events a year can’t accept the fact that if racing is going to survive it must promote racing as a gambling option to casino gambling - where all the people who were at the racetrack prior to 1980 are today.
11 May 2010 at 06:14 am | #
Racing can never be a viable option to casino gambling for MOST people for many reasons, among which are:
The learning curve for racing is too long.
The time between races is too long.
Slots provide the kind of mindless, quick, repetitive madness that consumers want.
The gambling aspect of racing cannot be grown. The only growth is in slot/racing partnerships and destination venue presentation.
11 May 2010 at 12:33 pm | #
Ace: You comment, “the racing curve is to long”.
What curve? are people who read a racing form stupid? Anyone who can’t understand what the past performances provide, within a couple of weeks, is,indeed, stupid!
The racing between races is to long? Are you serious? Since simulcasting came along, even I, an old, perhaps senile, gambler has trouble keeping up with the races going on on a given day, provided by the local OTB; they often go off faster than I can handicap them.
Racing’s problem is its failure to promote itself for what it is: a gambling option to casino gambling. If only the novice and the casino patrons knew what was going on in the racebook at the casino, just a feet from the slot machines.
It is hopeless, as turf writers to racetrack management do not get it; all are into promoting stake races and a handful of trainers, while racing at all racetracks across the country provide interesting gambling opportunities for anyone who wants go gamble, have an exciting moment, and, perhaps win.
Where is the marketing/advertising of racing as a gambling option to casino gambling? Nonexistent!
11 May 2010 at 04:44 pm | #
I heard today that Jorge Velasquez has been invited by Churchill Downs, at their expense, to attend the--what is it called?--Derby Legends Day at the track later this season. Maybe he would have been invited anyway, maybe not. I still think they owe him a Derby trip, with a ticket this time.