Besides the horses, the attraction on opening night was advertised as Sugar Ray. I looked around for a boxing ring and couldn't find any. Then somebody told me that Sugar Ray was a rock band. "A new group?" I asked. "Since the 1980s," came the answer. The second day, in the sunshine even though it was a Friday and Hollywood has been known for its Friday-night cards, the crowd count barely topped 2,000. That many might have shown up Friday night, by mistake. Half that many might have gone to Santa Anita, by mistake. But then came Saturday and Zenyatta, making the next-to-last run of her career and her final appearance in California. Bingo, a throng of almost 26,000 turned out and sang in the sunshine. A throng in horseracespeak is anything more than 20,000 these days. I saw Roger Licht, former chairman of the California Horse Racing Board, and said, "If only we could bottle this, and open it up every day." Licht said: "I'd settle for opening it once a month."
Now, all Zenyatta has to do to silence Beyer and other critics is win the Breeders' Cup Classic, against the best male competition extant, for the second time and the first time on dirt. Many will line up at the betting wickets at Churchill Downs on November 6 to say with their greenbacks that she won't. It is one thing to make up about three lengths in the last eighth of a mile against the powder-puff field in the Lady's Secret, another thing to make up for lost ground in Kentucky. Zenyatta made up more than 13 lengths to win the Classic last year, but because that was at Santa Anita, on a synthetic strip, questions persist.
I think Zenyatta is diabolical, through and through. She knows she can win, she even seems to know where the wire is. She's in no hurry to get there, and she never gets there late. It's all one big game of hers, to make sure we're paying attention. "She likes to make it a little dramatic," said her jockey, Mike Smith. "It is just incredible. To be honest with you, I try not to get too caught up in it, because it's just too emotional."
One thing not open to debate is that Zenyatta is one of the most popular horses to ever run in California. For her West Coast finale, they lined up I don't know how many deep along the walking ring. On the terrace above the ring, they scrambled for position. "There she is!" somebody said as the horses' handlers brought the horses over from the receiving barn. Many of the fans wore the souvenir black, pink and green baseball caps Oak Tree gave out at the gate ("Unbelievable Zenyatta," they read, a line from Trevor Denman's call of last year's Classic). Some of them, wearing other caps from home, put the Zenyatta caps on top of those caps. I even saw a wrangler from Central Casting with a Zenyatta cap on top of his 10-gallon Stetson. The Mad Hatter, I wanted to call him. They carried posters (Girl Power!"), they strained with their cameras to get a pre-race shot of Mike Smith climbing aboard. There was even a woman carrying a homemade hand fan, not a bad idea on the sweltering day. "I am a Zenyatta fan," the fan was labeled. I wanted to go up to her and give her my originality award, if I had had one.
In one of the first flashes on the tote board, 85 per cent of the bets in the win pool had been placed on the 6-year-old mare. By the end of betting, 71 per cent of the bets had been dropped on Zenyatta's nose. In mid-stretch, the filly Switch, three years younger than Zenyatta, was clinging to the lead and showing no signs of backing up. Every time Zenyatta runs, I smell an upset, and every time I am wrong. If I had been right this time, 26,000 hearts would have been transplanted to the topsoil. It would have been the biggest Hollywood funeral since Valentino. Instead, it was another celebration. Small boys and girls, not old enough to really know, joined in the applause. For one glorious afternoon in the sunshine, horse racing had its soul again.



03 Oct 2010 at 11:09 am | #
Great job of writing Bill. Maybe if we had more racing greats like Zenyatta on the track today there would still be racing coverage in the newspapers. Thank goodness for the Internet! Go Zenyatta we want to see 20-20-OH-OH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
03 Oct 2010 at 12:43 pm | #
Sorry for going off subject, Bill, but where on earth did you come up with Cicada being a champion grass horse?
03 Oct 2010 at 02:43 pm | #
Andy Beyer, whom you are talking about, and as I understand, was part of a forum yesterday at Hollywood Park. He was all red faced while being mercilessly booed and heckled by the attendees. And then while walking by the paddock area was again booed and heckled by the people there all the while stepping up his pace to leave the area.
Can anyone confirm this?
03 Oct 2010 at 08:07 pm | #
Patrick, you’re right, Cicada never won a grass title. One of those I should have looked up before writing. She was a dirt champ, but not grass. Actually she only ran on grass once. Thanks for the correction.
03 Oct 2010 at 10:23 pm | #
Andrew Beyer is sour grapes. He is beside himself because the SYNTHETIC SURFACES have skewed his speed figures and he can’t get them right. Andy wake up and recognize that Zenyatta has done more for racing than YOU, the CHRB and Frank Stronach together. Zenyatta embodies all that we love about Racing and she allows us a day to forget about all the big ego’s with their self serving little agendas and just enjoy her thrilling heriocs.
04 Oct 2010 at 06:24 am | #
Remember being asked before the Breeders’ Cup about Zenyatta, and I said she would be off the board. I was actually laughing at the stupid money she was taking. I was the stupid money. So much for ducking good competition. How can you ignore that race! Although it is true that her principals have had the audacity to run her against females...., and have had the nerve to meticulously map out her career, unfairly placing one of the great race riders in the game on her back, and giving her mind blogging attention in order ensure her health and welfare, which enabled her to win 19 races in a row, her run in the Breeders’ Cup is akin to Secretariat’s fabled Belmont, and one of the great moments in horseracing history. Her principals should be awarded, not criticized, for their handling of this animal, and for not for not succumbing to public pressure; if odds are any indication, last time I checked, the public is wrong 66.66% of the time. I’m ambivalent about her running in the big one; should she lose, by a nose, a neck, a head, a length, or a pole, the ignorant and contentious will fuel the flames of controversy, flaunting their stupidity with impunity. I’d like to see her run on the grass on Friday, and wheel back and win the big one on Saturday. It seems that is what she would have to accomplish to silence her critics. Joan of Arc, Mother Teresa, Zenyatta. Best of Luck Zenyatta, and Godspeed.
04 Oct 2010 at 06:34 am | #
Even a thoroughbred who’s record is 19 wins in 19 starts while racing on the Fair circuit or at Finger Lakes deserves accolades.
A constant comment being made about Zenyatta for sometime is that racing needs more like Zenyatta; that Zenyatta has introduced new ‘fans’ to Thoroughbred racing. Does Thoroughbred racing need new fans or new gamblers? Twenty-six thousand were in attendance Saturday, where were these fans Friday? How many of the 26,000 wagered money?
Zenyatta will bring out people, not gamblers; people who won’t show up again at a racetrack until another Zenyatta comes along; is this how racing will revive itself? Or, should the racing industry be promoting itself for what its real attraction is: the ability to gamble, to compete with casinos.
And who is beating the flames in the wrong direction? Turf writers.
As to Andy Beyer’s comments on Zenyatta. It should be obvious to turf writers what Andy Beyer is referring to: Zenyatta has raced primarily on synthetic tracks, and dirt horses have had a difficult time adjusting to synthetic. The great champions of the past raced on dirt. If Zenyatta wins or runs creditably on dirt in the Breeders’ Cup Classic, the thoroughbred certainly will earn the distinction of being one of the greatest thoroughbreds ever to race; if Zenyatta runs poorly there will always be questions as to whether the thoroughbred was aided by a synthetic surface.
All you Zenyatta fans who have cashed win tickets. How much money have you made? Just who has made all the serious money during Zenyatta’s win streak? Think maybe the owner, trainer, and jockey up. The fans haven’t won zilch! But, they aren’t at the racetrack to gamble, only to watch one thoroughbred - just what racing needs to grow!
04 Oct 2010 at 09:41 am | #
Back from L.A. with another round of great memories I will take to the grave. But you shouldn’t get upset with the Zenyatta-haters. I call them the moaners. They either don’t like Zenyatta herself because she’s perfect or they don’t like her owners because they’ve protected her like a daughter. They don’t like California, that’s OK, jealousy is human nature. But when Zenyatta wins the BC Classic, a race which many of the moaners say “she won’t even show up” what will there be to moan about? THIS IS GOING TO BE THE FUNNEST MONTH OF MY LIFE!
04 Oct 2010 at 02:33 pm | #
wmcorrow ~ you are wrong my man!~ she paid i believe 6-1 in her debut and fueled two big $1 pick 4’s in the Breeders Cup Classic which was paying $1100.00 before Quality Road was having his melt down, and it paid $1200.00 in her return in March at Santa Anita when she won the Santa Margarita. She also spurred I believe a decent $300-$400.00 .50 cent pick 4 at Del Mar. Also, the exa in the Breeders Cup and in the Santa Margarita both paid in $20.00 range for $1....enuff said…
04 Oct 2010 at 08:08 pm | #
You guys just can’t help yourself denigrating the big mare. The “powder puff” field in the Lady’s Secret included the winner of the Hollywood Oaks, who just happened to defeat the present heavy favorite for the 3yo filly title, and potential favorite for the BC Ladies Classic. I just don’t get why you guys continue to do this to her…
04 Oct 2010 at 10:16 pm | #
Top Turf Teddy wrote: ..."should she lose , by a nose, a neck, a head, a length, or a pole, the IGNORANT and CONTENTIOUS will fuel the flames of controversy, flaunting their STUPIDITY with IMPUNITY”.
What does that mean? Are the IGNORANT and CONTENTIOUS the people who bet ON Zenyatta or the people who bet ON another horse in the race, perhaps Blame or Quality Road? If Zenyatta loses, are you saying that the people who bet ON the winner are IGNORANT and CONTENTIOUS? You seem to be saying: I’M RIGHT! AND EVEN IF I’M WRONG, I’M RIGHT!
What is this about “STUPIDITY”? Are you saying that the people who bet on the winner, perhaps Blame, Quality Road or another entrant, were stupid not to have bet on Zenyatta? Even if their pari-mutuel tickets will be worth more than losing tickets?
I think you need to check your fanaticism with the parking lot attendant on Breeders’ Cup Saturday!
05 Oct 2010 at 09:50 am | #
Andy, bless his talented soul, has made a career of being a contrarian, so his putdown of Zenyatta
is just his nature.
I see another reader pointed out your mistake about
Cicada. But I can say—as one who goes back that far—that Cicada was (and is) my favorite racehorse of all time...and she was half the size of Zenyatta.
Here’s one of many incredible stax about Cicada:
she was 1-2-3 in her first 23 starts until she
finished off the board in the classic Jaipur-Ridan
Travers.
And it was Cicada—and stablemate Sir Gaylord --
who saved the Meadow farm before Riva and Secretariat came along 10 years later.
One final thought: How do you explain that DRF bases four full-time writers in California, and only one in New York? Even back when I had the NY beat, that was the case.
Be well, JP
05 Oct 2010 at 04:30 pm | #
Hi, John Piesen, always good to hear from you. I believe it was told to me once that the Form sold more papers in California than New York, therefore more coverage. Of course, you could make the reverse argument--why not beef up coverage in an area where you don’t sell as many papers? But that’s the best answer I have. Best regards.