Blame (the horse, not the verb) is a good story in his own right--his trainer, Al Stall Jr., is not exactly a household name in Breeders' Cup annals--but most of us will save his saga for another day. This is one time when the bridesmaid will definitely be catching the bouquet.
"She ran her heart out, but she just came up a little short," said John Shirreffs, who trains Zenyatta. There will be second-guessing that Mike Smith, who's ridden Zenyatta in all but three of her races, had her too far back early, leaving her with too much to do, and there could be something to that. Zenyatta's late runs always produced wins before, many by uncomfortably small margins, but often she was beating second-rate opposition and this time, in the richest race North America has, she was up against the best male horses that had survived the long year.
So Zenyatta will go down as the best horse never to win the Horse of the Year award. A year ago, the voters opted for Rachel Alexandra, who had beaten males two more times than Zenyatta, and this year Blame looks like a lead pipe for the title. He was lightly raced, but three of his four wins were in Grade 1 races, and Haynesfield, the only horse to beat him, was crushed in the Breeders' Cup. Zenyatta will still get some votes, including misplaced support from those who thought she was jobbed out of the title last time, but Blame's win at Churchill, over a surface he loves, was the tell-tale coda to a near-perfect year.
All week, I had bad vibes about the best story falling apart before my very eyes. I kept telling people that I had this hunch that Zenyatta's loop the loop from the quarter pole wouldn't be good enough. But in my dream of the race, I envisioned her coming perhaps a length short, not inches. She ran a winning race, only it won't show in the record book.
The Zenyatta camp was gracious in defeat, as is their fashion. Jerry Moss, Ann Moss' husband, was, like all of us, too accustomed to seeing Zenyatta get up in time all the time. "I thought she would get there," Jerry Moss said. "But she just missed. I'm proud of her. She lost to a great horse."
On ESPN, both Randy Moss (who's not related to Zenyatta's owners) and Jerry Bailey, the Hall of Fame jockey, had picked Blame to win. As he was going off the air, Moss said: "I almost feel guilty that we picked Zenyatta to get beat and we were right." But I'll never believe that Zenyatta got beat. She finished second, that's all. My old semantics teacher from college would be proud.


06 Nov 2010 at 08:49 pm | #
For what her 19 race win streak did for racing and for having never been beaten by Haynesfield, Zenyatta deserves HOTY. As was the case last year, a Classic win doesn’t come with a HOTY title. Similar to Slew’s loss to Exceller, my respect and admiration for Zenyatta’s performance in deafeat has only enhanced my respect and admiration for her.
06 Nov 2010 at 11:04 pm | #
While Zenyatta may not win HOY - again, I think who she is and what she has done throughout her career surpasses that award. She has compiled a 20 race career with a total losing margin of 3 inches. Name another horse that has accomplished that. She has the most Grade I wins for a female, highest female North American winnings, only female to win the Classic and was 3 inches short of doing it again. She proved she is not just a synthetic specialist. She didn’t just squeak by the rest of the field - she blew by them. She has brought such positive attention from the non-racing world to the sport that she deserves an award just for that. She’s given us 3 years of dancing and heart-stopping victories. I wasn’t alive for Man O’War & don’t remember Dr. Fager, I do remember Secretariat, and I would have no hestation in mentioning Zenyatta with the same breath as these horses. And even then, she is in a class by herself. She is unique.
07 Nov 2010 at 12:11 am | #
Blame is a very nice race horse and he ran a terrific race. But I can’t believe that anyone watching this race actually thinks he is the better horse. They say in horse racing that the best horse doesn’t always win. This was one of those situations. HOY is a subjective award and Blame will probably get it. However, think about this: Zenyatta is a certainty to be a first ballot inductee into the Hall of Fame; not sure Blame will get there at all.
07 Nov 2010 at 06:45 am | #
In 20 years Blame will be remembered in the same way as Upset, Dark Star, and Jim Dandy—the horse who defeated the legend.
Dakota’s comment has it right.
07 Nov 2010 at 12:52 pm | #
Bill,
I think you’re wrong. I believe that Zenyatta will win the HOY and by a comfortable margin.
07 Nov 2010 at 12:53 pm | #
I have always liked Zenyatta, but was never a fanatic, but I have a new respect for her that I didn’t have before. I belive she is a great horse !In a couple of years it will be Blame who? Zenyatta will always be the winner !!
07 Nov 2010 at 12:59 pm | #
Actually, I think Brian Zipse had it right when he said that Blame was the not the best horse in the Classic, even though he picked him to win. It was Zenyatta who had a horrible trip as opposed to Blame and according to his jockey Garret Gomez, had the perfect trip.
http://zipseatthetrack.blogspot.com/2010/11/in-defeat-zenyattas-legend-grows.html
My final thoughts are that Seth Hancock turned off alot of people when he claimed that his horse should automatically win the HOY after the race. A real classless statement and it will backfire on him.
How can anyone not vote Zenyatta for HOY?
07 Nov 2010 at 01:04 pm | #
Seth Hancock’s comments about how ZENYATTA couldn’t quite get past BLAME really are rather misleading and almost disingenous. It’s not as if ZENYATTA and BLAME raced, head to head, during the length of the stretch and she came up short. Far from it, actually. She got pinched back at the start, then lost contact with the field, was still dead last at the far turn, was about 10th at the top of the lane, and she still roared past everyone in the field only to lose a head-bob! If the roles had been reversed, and BLAME had been nearly 20 lengths back, and ZENYATTA were tucked into a comfortable position, I do believe that BLAME would have been out of the money, and ZENYATTA would have won by daylight!
BLAME won, though, and I do give him credit for that. But I won’t give him undue credit, however, because he had a great trip while ZENYATTA had an atrocious one! He didn’t “whip” her, he barely squeeked out the most desperate win imaginable.
As for the “horse of the year” debate it’s clear to me who the best horse is, once again, this year, and it’s ZENYATTA. She won 5 Grade 1’s, barely lost the big one due to an awful trip, and she put horse racing back in the news. BLAME won 3 Grade 1’s, including the big one, but was soundly defeated by HAYNESFIELD in the Jockey Club Gold Cup. I give my vote (not that I have one) to ZENYATTA.
Michael Jordan transcended basketball. William Shoemaker transcended horse racing. ZENYATTA, too, is bigger than the sport, and it would be nice to see the Eclipse Award voters finally recognize that.
07 Nov 2010 at 02:52 pm | #
I should be sad, I wanted to see her win, so badly
I’m not sad… I love her, and she didn’t disappoint, not at all
I watched the race with a room full of football boys, none had any exposure to horse racing and their shouts in support of and in awe of Zenyatta said it all
what a race! what a horse!
I’m in love, and my vote (please, can I have yours Bill?) yes! Zenyatta!
07 Nov 2010 at 07:34 pm | #
How is it classless that Hancock thinks Blame should win HOY but it’s not classless when Shirreffs says the same thing immediately after the loss? I think both were emotional statements after an incredible race and are being taken a bit out of context. Blame was more wins in open races and defeated Zenyatta, with no major frontrunner this year I think the nod should go to Blame. I will say though that I have a much deeper appreciation for Zenyatta is yesterdays loss than in all her races this year.
07 Nov 2010 at 08:54 pm | #
I will say this:
4/5 on Zenyatta was a huge underlay.
5/1 on Blame a huge overlay.
Alot of serious players made money on this race.
07 Nov 2010 at 09:38 pm | #
Zenyatta will be HOY hands down.
Much different situation from last year. Rachel Alexandra was also tremendously popular with her own large fanbase, and was regarded as one of the greatest 3yo fillies of all time.
Before yesterday, Blame was a wallflower.
Blame is a very nice horse, but no one will ever call Blame a “great” horse. He got dusted by a NY-bred in the JC Gold Cup. He beat Zenyatta by inches while enjoying a huge home-court edge. There are enough Eclipse voters who know which side the bread is buttered on for Zenyatta to prevail.
07 Nov 2010 at 10:59 pm | #
Zenyatta was much the best horse in that race. Blame had a dream trip, and a straight inside path to the finish line to win by a nose in his own back yard. Zenyatta had to come Silky Sullivan-like from behind, and knife through heavy traffic in the far turn. Quality Road tired out and nearly stopped in front of her, causing her to put on the breaks; this probably cost her the race. Also, Musket Man crossed right over into her path. While she was angling out wide, Blame was already beginning his charge from his clear path to the finish line. The fact is that she covered far more ground in virtually the same time.
Hers was by far the best performance in that race. And she also CRUSHED the rest of that field - you know Lookin at Lucky, Quality Road, Haynesfield, Musket Man. As a matter of fact, it was none other than Ed Fountaine (post #12) who claimed back in August 7 that Quality Road was a better horse and would “whip” (his word) Zenyatta in a race.
Blame is an excellent horse. I do not hold it against him that he won the Breeders’ Cup Classic on his home track. I also do not hold it against him that he is a dirt specialist who never ran over a synthetic track, and never ventured West of the Rockies. He is no doubt deserving of an award for best older male horse.
But Zenyatta is Horse of the Year. She put horse racing back on the map. She made the Sport relevant again. She also turned in the best performance in the biggest race of the year, for the second year in a row. She is the best mare of all-time. If she does not win this award, the award will be rendered meaningless.
07 Nov 2010 at 11:40 pm | #
According to Mike Smith he says he was seriously thinking of easing up Zenyatta in front of the grandstands after the start knowing that she wasn’t adapting to the surface. Instead he let her go on. Considering this, and the fact she had her momentum broken by Quality Road stopping in front of her, I’m starting to think her performance last night was better than her win in the 2009 Classic…
Here’s a vote for Zenyatta to continue on racing. She shows no sign of letting up.
08 Nov 2010 at 03:17 am | #
Ed,
I hope you’re right, but I don’t see it.
Too many people stick to the formula: A+B=C. They’ll vote for Blame.
08 Nov 2010 at 07:02 am | #
How’s the Koolaid? I see there’s still some left.
The connections campaigned for runner up HOY once again and they will most likely succeed. There were multiple races she could have run in out here in California. The Hollywood Gold Cup, Pacific Classic, and on and on. Some of the races were on the same day she ran against lesser. The connections chose those races. They didn’t have to ship her even though they should have. This is their doing and nobody elses. Yes, they are fine people and Zenyatta is a great one but they went out of their way to keep her perfect by racing against the likes of Rinterval and Switch. Those two couldn’t even compete in the Ladies Classic and had to run in a sprint that they still couldn’t win.
If you want to have a special award then by all means Zenyatta deserves it but giving her HOY would be a mistake.
08 Nov 2010 at 08:40 am | #
A vote by a group of men and women who write about horse racing will never change who Zenyatta is or what she has done; this is etched in stone. I guess these ridiculous disputations are spawned from man’s primitive nature, which is difficult to transcend. Those who criticize Zenyatta for having the audacity to run against females, are ignorant, at best. These same critics seem to hold Zenyatta to a standard extraterrestrial in nature, any they might bring her back down to earth (and themselves) if they took a peek between her legs.
08 Nov 2010 at 09:19 am | #
The next time I have a bad beat and get a nose hung on me can some of you come to the window with me and make them pay anyway?
If you want to make Zenyatta HOY then just say these words instead of hiding behind a bunch of rationalizations.
“Zenyatta was not HOY but I’m voting for her anyway”
“Zenyatta was not HOY but I’m voting for her anyway”
“Zenyatta was not HOY but I’m voting for her anyway”
Zenyatta is an all time great one and the race she ran was tremendous but the fact is that her connections campaigned her for runner up HOY. There were many races in California like the Hollywood Gold Cup or the Pacific Classic that she didn’t have to travel to run in. Some of those races were on the same day she chose to run against lesser.
It’s fine if Horse Racing wants to come up with another award to recongnize Zenyatta for bringing positive attention to the sport but to vote for her for HOY is malpractice.
08 Nov 2010 at 10:04 am | #
Here are the known phobias beginning with the letter Z: (1) Zelophobia- Fear of jealousy; (2) Zeusophobia- Fear of God or gods; (3)
Zemmiphobia- Fear of the great mole rat; (4) Zoophobia- Fear of animals. I’ve just notified the American Psychiatric Association of the latest and rather bizarre “Z” phobia that is spreading like wildfire: Zenyattaphobia. It is characterized by a fear and loathing of an equine female specimen considered by public opinion to have achieved greatness commensurate with her male counterparts. The symptoms are: (1) hysterical repetitive rants on horse blogs regarding HOY; and (2) thumb sucking near the finish line in a fetal position.
08 Nov 2010 at 10:30 am | #
Andrew A is exactly right.
Zenyatta is a great story and a tremendous horse, but HOY??
C’mon, that’s ridiculous.
She didn’t win a race of consequence all season, unless you consider those small fields against 2nd tier horses races of consequence.
Sorry, Kling/Fountaine but Blame WON the race Saturday, not Zenyatta.
The same Blame who won the Whitney and Stephen F Foster.
He may not be exciting and they won’t make a movie about him but Blame IS the Horse of the Year.
08 Nov 2010 at 02:02 pm | #
Kelly, what you say about Zenyatta bringing in a few new fans is part of her equation. There are no scientific facts, but I’d say she was responsible for more new fans than the Secretariat movie. But should Horse of the Year voters include Zenyatta’s charm in their thinking? There are no voting rules, so they can do as they wish. It’s a tough vote. But I’ll keep my ballot and decide at the last minute, after a lot of rehashing. With Zenyatta, it’s going to be tough (maybe impossible) not to vote from the heart.
08 Nov 2010 at 02:37 pm | #
No, Bill, voters should vote based on the fact that she turned in the best performance in that race.
08 Nov 2010 at 04:18 pm | #
Andrew A,
The mistake her connections made was not that they didn’t run her in the races you mentioned.
Their mistake was not taking her to one of the premier Grade 1 races at Saratoga or Churchill Downs so she could get acclimated to the kick-back on dirt.
If you get a chance, watch the isolated shot from the race. Early on she is recoiling from the dirt in her face, something she didn’t experience as severely in her two Oaklawn races. The Churchill surface was very cuppy and breaking loose, hence the exaggerated amount of kick-back.
08 Nov 2010 at 05:14 pm | #
Hey Nick Kling!!
Stop making excuses!
Zenyatta ran great, but Blame won the race.
Horse of the Year should and hopefully will go to Blame. He deserves it.
08 Nov 2010 at 07:59 pm | #
The Great Mole Rat, you made my day! Hysterical
09 Nov 2010 at 12:25 am | #
It’s extremely disconcerting to read comments from people who think that Horse of the Year honors should be awarded for any achievement which took place prior to January 1, 2010! Some people have said that consideration should be given to Zenyatta for her accomplishments over the last three years! That’s throwing logic and objectivity to the winds! If there IS an award for Horse of the Last Three Years, OF COURSE it should go to Zenyatta, but she was NOT the Horse of the Year for 2010! That award should go to the ONLY horse to defeat Zenyatta!
09 Nov 2010 at 07:12 am | #
chasham, while 99.9% of the time you are correct that previous year’s achievements shouldn’t count towards HOY, I think this year is a little different. Zenyatta won 5 out of 6 races this year, all Grade I’s, but those races were #15, #16, #17, #18, & #19. The only other horse with that record is Pepper’s Pride & hers were all in New Mexico & most were only state bred races. And if you want to say that Blame should get it because he beat her by 3 inches, how do you reconcile Blame getting trounced by Haynesfield, who finished next to last in the Classic?
09 Nov 2010 at 11:37 am | #
What is the purpose of handing out awards? In any entertainment industry - and horse racing falls into this category - the purpose is to promote that industry.
The Oscars. The Emmys. The Grammys. Their pupose is to stage an awards show that will draw new customers and keep the present customers coming back.
No one will ever accuse the thoroughbred racing industry of being as astute or farsighted as the film, TV and music industries. But if it were, HOY would have to go to Zenyatta.
But if you are strictly going to base HOY on what a horse did on the racetrack, let’s look at Blame’s record:
1) Grade 3 win in the W.D. Schaefer.
2) Won the Stephen Foster by a half-length over a horse that came out of that race with a career-ending injury.
3) Beat Quality Road by a head in the Whitney getting 5 pounds; at level weights, there’s a good chance he loses that race.
4) Got trounced by a New York-bred (a good one, yes) in the Jockey Club Gold Cup.
5) Beat Zenyatta by inches in the BC Classic while enjoying a tremendous home-court advantage.
If Blame had won the JCGC, he’s HOY. No ifs and or buts. But he never came close, at 4-5. To me, Blame lost HOY when he lost the Gold Cup. I don’t understand how anyone can look past that defeat.
Objectively speaking, can anyone say Blame was the best race horse of 2010 because he out-photoed Zenyatta in the Classic? In the future, does anyone doubt that Zenyatta will be recognized as the best horse to race this year? Of course not.
Nick: Perhaps the biggest obstacle Zenyatta faces in the voting is that a large block of voters are from the DRF. The DRF publisher, in his BC Day blog, wrote: “Blame earned Horse of the Year (by winning the Classic.” Not “might have earned...”
How many DRF voters are going to take their cue from their boss?
09 Nov 2010 at 03:32 pm | #
Dear Mr. Fountaine:
Once again, I do not compare horses except for the purposes of making a pari-mutuel investment, but I certainly like your style, and your arguments, for which you propose facts and honest comparisons. With respect to your point 3) above, and Blame’s defeat of Quality Road in the Whitney on 7 August, Quality Road had 67 days off after 2 incredible performances in the Donn on 6 February and the Metropolitan on 31 May. I have no knowledge as to why Quality Road was given 68 days off (and after the Life at Ten fiasco and the tall tale about reaction to lasix don’t believe a word from that camp), but I have to believe he was not at his best that day, and after his performance in the Breeders’ Cup, could argue he still is not the same horse, and may never be again. The argument that he defeated the “great” Quality Road, who was arguably not so great at that point in time, makes this less of an accolade for Blame in my opinion. What we have left, is a quality horse (Blame), with 2 other ho-hum wins, one of which is only a Grade 3, and then a spectacular win in the Breeders’ Cup by about 1/100 of a second against an undefeated female, who just happened to win the Breeders’ Cup the year before. As I’ve said, I don’t compare horses, except for the purposes of making a pari-mutuel investment, but hypothetically, should someone tell me there was going to be a match race the first week of December, between Blame and Zenyatta, same distance, same track, same jockeys, and Blame did not have 10 other horses to run interference for him, I would take 3/5 on Zenyatta, and give Blame a 4 length head start. But since there is no such race, and I cannot make a pari-mutuel investment, no such comparison of the two horses will be forthcoming from Top Turf Teddy. What a game, huh?
Sincerely,
Top Turf Teddy
14 Nov 2010 at 07:28 pm | #
Zenyatta will win the 2010 “Horse of the Year” hardware. It won’t even be close.
There were alot (...and I mean alot) of turf writers at the Jockey Club Gold Cup and these turf writers have memories like elephants. They “never” forget.
Many of them (which I overheard) were disgusted with Blame and have had enough of him when they witnessed “with their own eyes”, a New York bred dismantling him by 4 lenghts.
14 Nov 2010 at 07:46 pm | #
If Zenyatta doesn’t win HOY, it will be “good for me” in the long run. I’ve been looking for a way to get the #### out this sport. This will do it.
I left wagering on the NFL (a decade ago) and if they #### Zenyatta over for the third year in a row, it will “allow” me to leave this sport in the rear view mirror.
I’m have “tired” of the bias in this sport. It reminds me of the backstabbing corporate meetings that I used to attend at corporate (in their conference rooms).
14 Nov 2010 at 08:58 pm | #
Ed Fountaine for Commissioner of Thoroughbred Horse Racing.
15 Nov 2010 at 04:53 am | #
BC,
Zenyatta is a very good horse. Blame is for sure not great, at least not now. Zenyatta’s campaign, with soft competition, allowed her enough gas in the tank to get up for one or two meaningful races a year. Personally, I’m against females running against males anyway (that Billie Jean King-Bobby Riggs mentality that led to Ruffian’s demise). Most graded stakes caliber horses today can pick and choose their spots and duck serious rivals. Trainers routinely can negotiate potential weight assignments in stakes with racing secretarys weeks in advance. That was not the case when racing was less prolific and trademark races had greater anticipation. There are no true handicap races in this country now. Legends of the game are those who carried top weight all the time against the best horses in the land (Exterminator, and Forego come to mind), ran past the age of three, and had owners who were more interested in preserving the sport for posterity than money.
15 Nov 2010 at 10:23 am | #
Perhaps it is worth noting that in the Santa Margarita Hcp, her first race this year, Zenyatta carried 127 pounds giving away from 11-16 to her opponents.
In the Vanity Hcp. she carried 129, giving away 9 pounds to St. Trinians, the favorite in the Big Cap, and 11 pounds to stablemate Zardana, who beat Rachel in the New Orleans Ladies.
15 Nov 2010 at 03:23 pm | #
Kevin,
Your doing what i’m doing. If Zenyatta is f_cked over for the third year in a row, they will not see me anymore. I have another hobby that will be filling my time for the next two decades. This hobby takes a lot of time so horse racing will be decimated when it comes to my daily itinerary.
These crooks that vote for HOY will not be receiving my time. It will be like horse racing never existed.
I mean when you really get down to it.....what would you expect from these characters that they call “voters”? I mean think about it. You can’t cast a play in hell and have angels as actors.
16 Nov 2010 at 03:58 am | #
JRP,
Really, you need to start editing this web site. The language is starting to get a little coarse.