Israel is a scriptwriter and onetime journalist, so I assume that he writes his own stuff. Even though what he said in Tucson might play well at the Comedy Club, he might have been better served had he cut his hyperbole with a dash of seltzer. "If David Israel continues to insult the broad base of California's remaining customer support, I do not think he should be accepting speaking assignments," Roger Way, a horseplayer, said in an e-mail. "Without the support of senior citizens, California horse racing would be forced to close the doors tomorrow."
If racing's core audience has been dying off for the last half-century, then why is there anybody queuing up to the parimutuel windows at all? I mean, some younger people must be going to the races. The rub is that there are not enough of them. Later on at Tucson, Israel said something about "selling racing as entertainment," and it's there that he's caught his shoe in the do-do. If 15 minutes of action stretched over a four-hour afternoon is entertainment, then I'm a monkey's uncle. If poring over page after page of agate type in the Daily Racing Form is entertainment, then the Marquis de Sade must have invented the game. There's nothing wrong with waiting a half-hour to see several horses sprint six furlongs, or trying to turn a coin by dividing workout times by Beyer numbers and squaring the quotient, but these exercises are not for everyone, especially the guy who gets his kicks by receiving two cards from the dealer every 30 seconds.
Racing needs to be sold as a gambling game, and little else. The average racegoer, and especially the newcomer, doesn't look upon a 10-horse field as a beauty contest. All they want to do is cash enough tickets to go home with at least as much if not more than what they started with. Referring to Secretariat as "No. 4" might be blasphemy to the romantics, but in the real world a horse, like Gertrude Stein's rose, is simply a horse. If you have a good day at the wickets, the mountains behind Santa Anita are picturesque; if you've caught a steady run of slow horses, they're just a facade.
Getting back to Israel and the old fogies at the track, Andy Asaro, another concerned California horseplayer, said: "Is this appropriate language for the vice chairman of the racing board to be using when referring to his best customers? I know he was talking about attracting younger customers, but. . .wow!"
Allen Gutterman, the veteran marketing maven at Santa Anita, has, unlike Israel, been around long enough to know new customers can be courted without disdain for the old. "Social networking allows us to communicate directly with fans and horseplayers and let them know what's happening at Santa Anita," Gutterman said in a recent Q & A with the Paulick Report. "Direct mail seems old school, but is still phenomenally productive and permits us to talk to great customers for very little money, particularly to those who don't have Blackberrys or I-Phones or who are not Web savvy."
A long time ago, in a galaxy known as New York, Ogden Mills "Dinny" Phipps talked about creating new customers and said that racing's biggest obstacle was "the intimidation factor." The Intimidation Factor is alive and well and still frequents all the racetracks. Almost every new customer is greeted by I.F. at the door. I've experienced the same sensation, when I get the itchy, twitchy feeling to play baccarat in Las Vegas.


12 Dec 2010 at 08:49 am | #
Mr. Israel should visit Canterbury Park on a Thursday or Friday.
With Thursday Buck night and Friday’s live bands, the crowds--5,000-6,000--are young. Though if he’s only talking off season simulcasting attendees his analogy is more accurate.
I’m sure other tracks also attract younger fans for live racing, especially for special promotions and events.
But most of these fans don’t bet “televised” races.
When Canterbury offers a simulcast stakes race between the 7th an 8th race on a Saturday, it seems half the crowd leaves.
12 Dec 2010 at 09:04 am | #
Another great article Bill. Keep the parlay going.
Horse Racing was strong enough to overcome incompetence, greed, and corruption for decades but not any longer. David Israel is a prime example of someone that doesn’t belong working on anything to do with Horse Racing. He should apologize and/or resign for his insensitive comments about Senior Citizens who play the horses.
I’m convinced that when the Governator appointed David Israel to Vice Chairman of the CHRB it was a big mistake. I’m pretty sure there was some sort of snafu and the wrong box was checked on the paperwork. Given his comments about Horse Racings best Customers being “deceased” or “decomposed” I have to believe he really intended to appoint this guy to the Californa Morticians Board. Then again maybe he was supposed the be on the California Entertainment Board. After all he believes Horse Racing is about the entertainment and has little to do with gambling. I’m leaning toward the Morticians Board though.
People like David Israel are like “human anchors” and drag the sport down. He needs to apologize and/or resign from the CHRB for his comments.
How about appointing Barry Meadow or Roger Way to the board of the CHRB. It would be a smart move! Maybe that’s the problem. It would be a smart move. LOL
12 Dec 2010 at 09:12 am | #
Want to get the young people involved? The answer is start them out early, in Kindergarden. Teach them their letters using a picture of S-E-C-R-E-T-A-R-I-A-T, and a class trip to the “Big A.” When the time is right, teach them math, fractions and percentages, using a toteboard in the classroom and the numbers found in the Daily Racing Form, which should be required reading. Stop teaching about outdated famous mathematicians like Sir Isaac Newton, and replace them with guys like Andrew Beyer. Instead of “weekly reader” money, the parents should send in “Bloodhorse” money.
TTT
12 Dec 2010 at 01:10 pm | #
BC,
Thanks for keeping the pressure on. Here’s the flip side of “Takeout To Rise.” I recommend relyricizing one’s favorite songs as an entertaining alternative to scouring past performances at those times when one’s wagered dollar is undervalued. This exercise assumes Andrew A’s more accurate acronym: CHREB—California Horse Racing ENTERTAINMENT Board
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDbHBuqJsTs&feature=related
Once again, with apologies to Paul McCartney
Hey Chreb,
It’s not too late
Take back bad laws
That hurt the bettor
The minute you convince yourselves to rescind
Then you begin
To make it better
Hey Chreb,
Don’t be afraid
You were made to
Protect the bettor
Remember that giving him a fair shake
Is no mistake
The game gets better
So anytime you feel the urge
Hey Chreb, converge
But don’t be the scourge of thoroughbred racing
Cause don’t you know that it’s a fool
Who makes a rule
No-one has any intention of embracing
Da da da da da
da da da da
Hey Chreb,
Don’t knock us seniors
Older players have
More time and money
Unless you’re trying to make us depart
You’ll have to start
Treating us better
So lower takeout now and win
Hey Chreb, begin
The writing on the wall requires reading
And don’t you know that it’s a curse
To raise the purse
Of races with too few horses competing
Da da da da da
da da da da Yeah
Hey Chreb,
Don’t wait too long
Take your sad song
And make it better
The sooner you stop sounding like comics
And obey laws of economics
Business will get better
Better, better, better, better, better, Yeah,Yeah,Yeah
Nah, Nah, Nah, Nah, Nah, Nah, Nah, Nah, Nah, Nah, Hey Chreb
12 Dec 2010 at 02:58 pm | #
I’m sorry, but David Israel is right. All you have to do is look at the sport in other countries, especially Asian ones, and then compare it to the state of the sport in the U.S. and he is spot on.
If someone wants just to gamble, there are so many more opportunities available that have a lower learning curve and/or more adrenaline. In the heyday of horse racing, it was the only game in town. Continuing that line of thinking - the ‘take it or leave it’ attitude - into the present day is one of the things killing it.
As for the average age of followers of the sport and how to attract new ones, that is a lesson that Zenyatta and her team has demonstrated dramatically this year and if horse racing keeps its blinders as tightly glued shut as it has the previous decades, it deserves to continue the slow death it is going through. While the gambler supports the sport, the fans are the ones who bring the excitement and new people in. And there will be a certain percentage of those new people who stay and gamble. What I’ve noticed instead is that the long time gamblers belittle the fans. How is that going to keep people interested in the sport long enough to learn the ropes or attract new ones? Horse racing doesn’t need either the fan or the gambler - it needs both. And to do that, it needs to bring in the new fans and help them become longterm supporters. The markets in Asia have done a superb job of that and the industry here needs to learn from it.
So if it takes somebody saying something that is offensive and unpleasant to get people to listen and do something, then good for him.
12 Dec 2010 at 04:21 pm | #
Tell me one thing, Susan:
Are you really Mrs. David Israel?
12 Dec 2010 at 04:22 pm | #
Sorry, I am desperately seeking Susan today.
I meant Karen.
12 Dec 2010 at 04:22 pm | #
Karen, I think you are on the right track. It is my belief that on a level playing field, Horse Racing could stand up to other forms of gambling. The problem is that other simpler forms of wagering, which have far less overhead, have done everything possible to make it easy for their customers, and have been assisted by legislators, while the lack of interstate cooperation between the many Horse Racing venues within the United States in a simulcast environment, combined with legislation that restrains trade, and favors the casino and lottery business, makes it extremely difficult for the industry to survive. These “slot machines” rode in on the coattails of the horse racing industry and now Horse Racing plays second fiddle, and is at the mercy of these entities. Terrible business deals were made by greedy politicians, who care nothing about racing. Where slot machines were allowed at these horse racing venues, a far greater percentage of each dollar should have gone to our industry. They sold out for a bowl of porridge. It is outrageous that these casinos make windfall profits, and the horse racing industry struggles.
TTT
12 Dec 2010 at 04:45 pm | #
Bill, I’m a 50+ yr. old woman - not quite deceased or decomposed yet, but getting closer every day. I have 2 sons who are in the target demographic for horse racing - mid 20’s, still single, sports nuts - who I have been trying like crazy to get interested in the sport. But they tell me their reasons why they’re not and I can’t argue with them. Learning how to read the forms and make intelligent decisions is a lot of work and they don’t enjoy it. I’ve taken them to Churchill Downs with me, they might like it better on one of the Friday Night light programs though. And they bring up all the bad publicity about steroids and other drugs being abused. The Life At Ten fiasco doesn’t help on that front. And then seeing how many establishment horse writers have dismissed the positive publicity that Zenyatta and her team have brought to this sport which so desperately has needed it makes me want to throw up my hands in the air, walk away and take up something constructive, like needlepoint.
12 Dec 2010 at 05:31 pm | #
To finish that thought:
Asian marketing has succeeded so well because they have marketed to female fans. That has worked because if women are there, the men are sure to follow. And the men will want something to do besides ooh and aah over the horses.
12 Dec 2010 at 06:05 pm | #
Karen, I must admit, although I would love Saratoga if there were only men, the presence of women certainly adds something to the ambience and mystique, and I thoroughly enjoy their presence, but if racing has to depend on that angle, it is doomed. When I’m at the track, I’m looking for a fast filly to make a score, not a date for the prom.
TTT
12 Dec 2010 at 07:41 pm | #
Another great article,Bill… The David Israel Comedy/insult routine must go. He has a Hollywood background, like Joe Harper(Grandson of C.B.DeMille)of Del Mar,and Joe sells a lot of beer at the concerts but fails to make new horseplayers.
None of the entertainment or beer money goes for purses or the mainstream flow for horse racing.
The City of Del Mar pays a lot of overtime for extra police on concert extravaganza nights.
Why can’t horse racing be run by Sportsmen who understand the gaming part of the industry?
12 Dec 2010 at 07:52 pm | #
Karen, your thoughtful reply to a wiseass leaves you in good stead.
Once upon a time, I had daughters the same age as your sons, and it was the same thing, they never saw the point to horse racing, even though Mike Venezia, bless him, once loaned them complete riding outfits to go halloweening.
If this is politically incorrect, or racist, I apologize: But I think Asian racetracks have a built-in advantage in that a large number of their customers have an inherent need to gamble. They are known as a nation of gamblers. It goes with the culture. It’s not hard to market an audience so disposed. The Hollywood Park Casino would close if it wasn’t for their substantial Asian clientele.
Zenyatta was a refreshing exception, but there aren’t enough Zenyattas to go around. The cheers we hear for most horses come from people with tickets in their hands, some of them high-end tickets. You are like Bob Strub, who insisted because of some highfalutin reasoning that his employees call it “wagering,” not “betting.” Santa Anita survived some of Strub’s misguided moments because it was Santa Anita and had decades of tradition under its belt.
What would happen if they raced horses, even the great ones, and there was no betting? We all know the answer. Racing is 99% gambling, and track operators who don’t accept that are kidding themselves.
12 Dec 2010 at 08:14 pm | #
See, I am saying that gambling supports horse racing. BUT, to keep it alive and maybe even grow it, there needs to be more exposure and people involved and right now, that’s not happening. The Zenyatta effect has been proven the last 2 years. Every time she ran, all the numbers went up - attendance at the track she was running at and overall handle. That, to me anyway, points to the impact of fans who were buying $2 dollar tickets as souvenirs and maybe said - what the hack - and bought some more. If there was more promotion of the horse and more friendliness to the fan, how could that be anything other than good for the business? Horse racing has been a forgotten sport for a very long time. Bring the fans in, welcome them with open arms and there will be more money coming in to the sport. rwwupl, the entertainment and beer money goes to keeping the track open, without which we may as well be playing video games. People have to be exposed to horse racing and made to feel comfortable with what’s going on before they can become serious about it. I don’t see it as being anything other than a win-win. Am I missing a down side?
12 Dec 2010 at 08:32 pm | #
I’m pleased to see Mr. Israel reads The Serial Horseplayer
“Advertising Firm Says Table Games, Marketing to Dead Can Save Racing”
http://www.serialhorseplayer.com/Marketing_Firm_Says.php
12 Dec 2010 at 08:36 pm | #
There’s no downside to what you say, but the good horses don’t run that often and the marketing obstacle is to fill the empty seats on the other days. How to do that? You mentioned one thing--more friendliness to the fan. There was a convention years ago when a Disney marketer was brought in to tell horse folk how to treat customers. It went in one ear and out the other of most of the people in the room. It costs too much to go to the races--the costs before you get to your first bet have been well-documented. The average person, unfamiliar with the track but used to buying a movie ticket, walking a few steps, sitting down and enjoying the show, wonders why every 20 steps, starting with the parking lot, he or she is reaching into his pocket for another charge. You buy a big box of popcorn at a high price at the movie, but they give you a second box free. At the track, you buy a thimble of coffee for several dollars, and that’s all you get. At Santa Anita, they charge for icetea refills in the turf club, which might be the only restaurant in Los Angeles that does so. On a warm day, your icetea bill might be higher than anything else. And on and on. In Arizona the other day, Joe Harper commented about how much the Del Mar concessions raked in on opening day. Yes, but are the tracks in the business of gouging the hungry and thirsty, taking away their betting money, or are they trying to grow the business by furnishing a reasonably priced experience? Seniors should get in free at the track every day, but in California they don’t.
Thanks for keeping this interesting dialogue going.
12 Dec 2010 at 08:44 pm | #
Obviously, Mr Israel is incompetent if his best idea is to insult the customers that he does have. But, he does display a fine grasp of the obvious in stating that horse racing needs to attract young people.
If he and many other racing exec’s weren’t so busy trying to sell the data of horse racing, they might get a grip on how to attract the younger fan.
It should be real simple when you have observant people such as Karen lay it out for you in black and white.
mid 20’s, still single, sports nuts - who I have been trying like crazy to get interested in the sport. But they tell me their reasons why they’re not and I can’t argue with them. Learning how to read the forms and make intelligent decisions is a lot of work and they don’t enjoy it. I’ve taken them to Churchill Downs with me, they might like it better on one of the Friday Night light programs though. And they bring up all the bad publicity about steroids and other drugs being abused. The Life At Ten fiasco doesn’t help on that front.
When you can overcome the objections, you have a chance to make a sale. It’s not complicated.
Fire Israel, and hire someone to solve the problem, it is already identified.
12 Dec 2010 at 09:01 pm | #
Karen,
You are missing the fact that racing has been trying to attract young people with entertainment for 20 years, without any visible success.
Remember Friday night racing,$1 beer, “go baby go”, Hat contests,concerts all aimed at drawing young people through entertainment,and you will find them at the USC and UCLA football game.
When young people go to the track they do not bet until they get older and have the means to appreciate what racing has to offer.
Millions have been spent to attract young people and 20 years later you here the same chant that racing should provide entertainment to attract young people… what do they say about doing the same thing and expecting a different result? A. Einstein will tell you it is insanity.
There are plenty of candidates to become horse players, but the racing managers ignore them, did you realize the mature set is larger than ever before in history?… and they are not playing the horses because other “GAMING” offers a better deal
rwwupl
12 Dec 2010 at 10:38 pm | #
I’m in Indiana and visit the tracks here, along with some Churchill Downs and Keeneland. Of them all, Keeneland is the friendliest and easiest track to go to. The Indiana tracks really would rather you stay in the casinos. Churchill Downs is one of the rudest places I’ve ever been to for a place that depends on the customer for its livelihood. But, to give them credit, their Friday night program has been a success. And for their management to label it that, handle had to go up. Other than that, they are definitely not friendly to the beginner - they want you to come in, shut up and hand over all your money. The only reason I subject myself to that is when I want to see a particular horse or race up close and personal.
As for betting and age, it is true that the younger set don’t bet as much. One of the reasons is because there are so many complicated exotics. I don’t ever bet those. Warren Buffet said only invest in what you understand and he seems like someone to follow. So while other gaming offers a better deal, it’s also easier to hop right in and understand it. And I’ve been following horse racing for most of my life so I’m aware of the half-hearted, not funded properly attempts to reach out that didn’t work.
But the fact of the matter is, there needs to be more exposure and fans do that. And there needs to be more bettors and the sport seems to do all it can to drive them off. I would love to see horse racing survive as a viable sport long after my generation is gone. It will take those younger coming in for that to happen. So if the same old thing hasn’t worked, what will?
13 Dec 2010 at 06:54 am | #
David Israel does not write his own material; he borrowed and modified a saying originally expressed by Michael Busch, Speaker of the House - Maryland, several years ago: “The average age of a racing fan in Maryland is deceased.”
Am I correct that you wrote in your above commentary that, ‘racing needs to be sold as a gambling game, and little else;’ aren’t these words precisely what I have stated at HRC now for several years?
25 Dec 2010 at 05:08 am | #
We need coaches. Mentors. Hire professional players. The ones who make a 10 percent profit. Verified and have them be coaches and mentors. There are professional horseplayers. But the profit margin is small- 10 percent. Have them be coaches. All of the books I read- Jim Quinn- Steven Crist- Just beat around the bush. No one tells us how to do it and what to do. We are on our own and we all need coaches and mentors. This must be done. Because everyone is losing. Any one listening. Play the Pick 3’s. Straight wagering- W,P.S does not work. Unless you just want to be entertained. You will not be profiting long term if you bet Win- Place And Show. That’s a fact.