The fact that proponents of equine slaughter can stall a bill and keep it from being passed enrages and disgusts me. It should enrage you, too.
S. 311, A bill to amend the Horse Protection Act to prohibit the shipping, transporting, moving, delivering, receiving, possessing, purchasing, selling, or donation of horses and other equines to be slaughtered for human consumption, and for other purposes
OK, horsepeople, let's dice this out logically, shall we?
They probably tell their small children that "Daddy works in a horse slaughterhouse, but it's OK 'cause the horsies like it."
Let's think about this as if we're all intelligent, compassionate human beings. A few facts:
1) Equine slaughter is not only cruel--it's executed in a particularly, intentionally vicious fashion. Something to do with the myth that a horse who’s killed after being euthanized doesn’t taste as good. Or the meat is gamey. Or some such crock.
2) Equine slaughter is NOT necessary. All the reasons given by the pro-slaughter people are crap.
3) It is neither legal nor culturally acceptable to consume horsemeat in the United States.
4) The meat from those dead horses goes to Europe and Japan. For upscale dining and dog food. Most notably, to France and Belgium, where horsemeat is a delicacy. It's not like a 1,000 pound mustang is sacrificed to feed starving children in Appalachia or Africa. It's going to feed the egos of snotty Europeans who want to brag that they can afford a $100 Thoroughbred steak. Or that Phydeaux digs eating Triple Crown Alpo.
5) The Big Argument--that there are "just too many horses" is easily remedied: QUIT MAKING THEM.
It's precisely because I love horses that I know--and YOU know--that equine slaughter MUST be stopped. NOW.
There's no logical reason to continue the practice. A horse--or donkey, mule, burro or zebra, for that matter--is NOT a used Kleenex. You cannot just toss it out when you're through with it.
An equine is a living, breathing, feeling being, capable of giving and receiving love. In our culture--that of North America--horses played an integral role in the settling of the nations. They fought wars with us; provided protection and comfort; camaraderie and friendship. The equine species in North America, with the exception of wild horses--are domesticated animals. Like cats, dogs and gerbils.
Would you consider sending your beloved cat off to be slaughtered, to feed a rich Belgian or his pooch?
Then why--WHY--would you take your precious Thoroughbred--whose only mistake was being born slew-footed--and allow that animal to be slaughtered at the hands of a heartless human pig?
For four-hundred bucks?
Are ya kiddin’ me?
All the money that goes into breeding a Thoroughbred, into feeding, sheltering, training--and you'd let that horse go for a lousy four-hundred dollars?
What the Hell is WRONG with you???
All equines--ALL of them, including those wild horses, and Aunt Betsy's pet mule--deserve our unwavering protection, from inception to natural death. We in the world of Thoroughbred racing have a moral obligation, and a spiritual mandate, to not create horses for whom we cannot guarantee a good life.
They're not disposable. They're God-given gifts. They're not here on Earth for a "trial"--to see if you like them or not. You may have made them: you may be the breeder. But make no mistake: you are not their Creator. As breeder or owner, you bear an obligation to follow that horse all the way through its life, and assure that it never ends up in a killpen.
I attended the Keeneland Sales this past week, both nights. It was wonderful, I had a blast. The air was electric.
I couldn't help but think, though, about the billions of dollars represented in that sales pavilion. Amazing. So many people there who can buy and sell the world.
And I thought to myself...if each of these people took just ten minutes of their time to call their representatives in Washington, and demand that the Amendment to the Horse Protection Act be passed...it WOULD be passed. Senators and Congresspeople are very responsive to the demands of those who threaten to take away their fat jobs and bennies.
The Amendment makes illegal the shipping of equines for slaughter. Simple: horses can't get slaughtered if they can't get to the slaughterhouses. And, smart as they are--and lacking thumbs--they surely won't drive themselves there. This Amendment must be passed, so that the slaughterhouses' business dries up. They can't torture and kill what can't get to them.
So we have before us only two actions, both of which can be done this very night:
1) Every person in Thoroughbred racing--trainers, owners, breeders, fans, writers, editors, publishers, feed distributors, hay farmers, farriers, van drivers, grooms, exercise riders--can decide tonight to pick up the phone tomorrow morning and call our representatives in Washington. Tell them to pass this Amendment, stop the transportation of equines to slaughterhouses--and effectively stop the mass murder of our horses.
2) Every breeder in the United States can sit back, take a chill pill, breed selectively and remind themselves of why they do this: because they love these horses. If you make fewer horses this year, you may be a tad less-rich next year. But you'll also sleep better at night, because you have the assurance that you're helping pull the plug on equine slaughter. Your conservative breeding this spring means that five years from now there'll be fewer "unwanted" Thoroughbreds.
(I know, the thought of an unwanted Thoroughbred just doesn't make sense to me, either. Thoroughbreds are God's most magnificent creatures--who'd ever get rid of one? I want one so desperately, my own Thoroughbred--filly or colt, doesn't matter--that I cannot fathom anyone getting rid of one just because they "don't work out." )
If you breeders stop making so many babies, cool your hooves and breed more selectively--concentrate on quality, rather than quantity--you'll be contributing to the anti-slaughter effort in immeasurable ways.
This column is a call to stop slaughter, post-haste. Let's quit screwin' around, talking about it, clucking to ourselves, and feeling self-righteous because we know it's wrong. Nothing ever gets done because a bunch of horse lovers sat around bitching about it over a Dos Equis. Pick up the phone. Call Washington. Threaten their jobs--we ARE their bosses, we CAN vote them out.
Let's make a promise--a vow, if you will--to stop the heinous mass murder of all equines, once and for all, in the United States. It's not a good indicator that our nation allows it, for one very good reason: the quality of a society is measured by the quality of life of its weakest members.
Horses don’t have thumbs. Because of this one factor, they depend on us for their food, shelter—for their very lives. Even wild horses depend on humans to not destroy the natural vegetation and habitat in which they dwell. By merit of their dependence on we mere humans—equines are, indeed, in that “weakest members” category.
Ergo, if our society is being measured by our treatment of horses—we’re screwed. If we fail to stop the mass murder of our beautiful, loyal, sentient horses—we deserve the mantle, “barbarian,” for it’s a sign that our culture is going the way of the pterodactyl—and of Rome.
I'm an opinionated woman, I know. But the fact is that if you make a living in this sport and don't care enough about our horses to make sure that slaughter stops, immediately--you don't deserve to make a living in this sport.
Obviously, I like horses a lot more than I like humans: I've never met a horse I didn't like. I can't say that about people.



14 Apr 2008 at 08:18 am | #
Marion is right, there is no reason for the wanton disregard for race horses and the cruel slaughter. The Slaughter industry is a false industry , created by the French and Belgians who have exploted American horses for 30 years. The Thoroughbred industry , supposdley the Sport of Kings, is really the Sport of Shame and Greed. Rich owners and breeders do not take the total responsiblity for the lives of the horses they bring into this world. Who in the racing industry really stands up and takes care of all the horses they have? Only one I know of Frank Stronach. John Hettinger has done a marleous job of saving race horses from slaughter, who else??? Even the very rich who win Kentucky Derbys do not take full responsibility. The Grayson Foundation and Jockeys Club are more worried about funding more drug reseach then the long term welfare of horses who need to retire. How can an industry continue to hide it's underbelly side and expect fans to keep coming knowing the people who own and breed these horses don't care what happans to them? Fans , unite , let the tracks know it is not ok to use horse slaughter as your disposal method any longer.
14 Apr 2008 at 11:17 am | #
Unless you are both vegans, I can't buy your argument. Why is eating horse meat different than eating any other animal? What more can be done for these unwanted animals other than a humane ending?
14 Apr 2008 at 11:24 am | #
You wrote: >OK, horsepeople, let's dice this out logically, shall we?> Problem is, your emotional, sentimental rhetoric has limited appeal when folks are watching their bank balances dwindle while feed and fuel prices grow. While your argument may make sense to horse crazy 12 year old girls, you'll need to rephrase it to be truly 'logical' to have it appeal to reality-mindful adults. Otherwise, all the righteous indignation you can muster is just 'drama.'
14 Apr 2008 at 11:40 am | #
BRAVO!!
You made the case for banning horse slaughter with logic and common sense. Only those members of the horse community who want to wring every last nickel out of their horses' hides, regardless of the animal's treatment, will whine and question your reasoning.
Unfortunately, some members of the horse community are driven by greed alone. The horses they own would be better off under other ownership.
14 Apr 2008 at 11:50 am | #
Ondine wrote:
>
Unfortunately, some members of the horse community are driven by greed alone. The horses they own would be better off under other ownership.
>
Another baseless, emotional remark. It is possible for a business to provide very well for the horses it owns, while horses owned by someone who 'loves' them may be starving to death.
14 Apr 2008 at 12:47 pm | #
God help us if we can't get this done!!!!!!
14 Apr 2008 at 12:56 pm | #
I'm sorry to say it but even if this bill passes both Houses, do you really think this President will sign it into law? He has a Vice President from Wyoming, and he himself has a cowboy-wanna-be mentality, along with his favoring corporations making all the money their greedy hands can muster at the expense of the environment and the middle class. Do you really think he cares about what horses go through in their transport to and process of being slaughtered? All of the candidates are co-sponsors. We will have to wait for one of them to get into office.
14 Apr 2008 at 04:55 pm | #
Marion,
You touched a nerve. Hopefully it will strike a responsive chord, too. Stay on the case. The politicos won't stand a chance!
John
14 Apr 2008 at 05:53 pm | #
Kevin wrote: "What more can be done for these unwanted animals other than a humane ending?"
Are you kidding? If you think that horses have a "humane ending" in a slaughter house, then you need to view these videos, immediately!
http://www.sharkonline.org/?P=0000000528
http://www.saplonline.org/Legislation/slaughtervhumaneeuth.htm
http://www.hsus.org/video_clips/horse_slaughter_cruelty.html
There is a reason it is called a "slaughter". Slaughter is never "humane", that would be an oxymoron.
14 Apr 2008 at 06:47 pm | #
Thank you Marion. Emotional on horse slaughter?.I AM FURIOUS....Horses an American Icon are being bred for slaughter, pmu farms and people over breeding,to supply foreign owned butchers for money. HORSES ARE NOT COWS. This bill should have been past when they closed the slaughter houses in the US why wasn't it MONEY pro slaughter organizations? USDA? the BLM? all have their hands out. What other reason would there be to send horses to an auction,(yearlings, foals, mixed with so called unwanted) transported for 30 hours, no food no water, cramped up that they can't even lift their heads....then brutally killed and butchered. THIS IS AN AMERICAN DISGRACE. IF THEY WERE SO CONCERNED ABOUT OVER POPULATION WHY HAVEN'T THEY COME UP WITH LOW COST HUMANE EUTHANASIA ? BS I FOR ONE AM NOT BUYING THEIR POOR EXCUSES FOR HORSE SLAUGHTER. HOW CAN YOU CALL YOURSELF A HORSE LOVER WHEN YOU ARE ALLOWING THIS HAPPEN. NEVER SHOULD HAVE BEEN STARTED AND IT IS SICKENING
14 Apr 2008 at 08:47 pm | #
To Questions: I am not a 12 year old girl. I also am watching my bank balances. I'd love to have a horse, but know that I can't afford it. So I am supposed to think that horse slaughter is OK because some horse owners who did not plan for high fuel and feed prices now can't afford to feed their horses? A horse that they voluntarily bought or bred? Who made the emotional decision here? I want, but I can't afford... sound familiar?
My question is: why should we continue to reward irresponsibility?
14 Apr 2008 at 08:54 pm | #
Lisa, that's a really good question.
I want a horse and also can't afford it, therefore, I don't have a horse.
When I know that I can keep that horse for his/her life, then I will get a horse.
Seems pretty logical to me and evidently, logical to you!
In fact, I'd go so far as to say it's common sense.
14 Apr 2008 at 09:19 pm | #
John, thank you so much for your great show of support...indeed, let's not only touch some nerves, let's jump up and down on them.
To those who agree that slaughter must be stopped--let's get on it. Thank you for writing, and for strongly, valiantly expressing your rage.
To those who don't agree...well...yes, my arguments are indeed infused with emotion. This is an emotional issue. But--if you knew anything about logical argumentation--you'd see that I did express my argument according to the rules of said discipline.
And if you think that this issue ISN'T an emotional one--what in God's Name are you doing in horse racing? Clearly, you are among the very few who can look into a horse's eye and not see infinite strength and eternal beauty...and I pity you.
Switch your need for speed to NASCAR: nobody gets emotional about a carwreck. If you need something fast on which to bet---make the move from colts to Mustangs.
Cars don't bleed, and scream, and rail all the way to the boneyard.
14 Apr 2008 at 10:32 pm | #
Funny thing is white people felt that way about Africans and African-Americans in this country and in Europe. Use us up. When they were done we were inhumanely beaten/slaughtered to death. The images of slaughtered horses hanging upside down give way to the horrible reminder that we were "strung up" by our necks and left for death and even burned as if hanging and beatings were not enough.
No matter what side you choose, it is based on your individual opinion--which is rooted in your feelings and the last time I checked--feelings are emotional, so being "too emotional" is not a good argument or reason to suggest that useless and inhumane horse slaughter is necessary.
You want to kill a horse, do it mana a hoof. He has no weapon or gang of "horse thugs" behind him/her so why should you think it that its OK for you to go unfairly into a fair fight? Just a thought for the--pun intended--"neeeiigghh-sayers against the ethical and humane treatment of animals. Peace.
15 Apr 2008 at 12:49 am | #
Great points made here by Mare, Patricia, Craig, Marjorie C., Black Beauty, Lisa and Whit.
Kevin, some of us horse lovers HAVE in fact become vegan after learning about the horrors of their slaughter -- and about the gruesome slaughter of all species.
The excuse that killing-for-profit SAVES horses is transparently bogus. Try to apply that lame argument to human beings in need of help or a new home -- and see if it stands up.
When we employ evil and pretend it's good, we're being selfish and sinful.
I would ask everyone involved in the horse racing business to take a look in the mirror and see if they are in any way responsible for exploiting these magnificent creatures.
For instance, is gambling on animals a way to improve society or a sure means of debasing it? Is backing an industry that breeds animals with abandon and casts off the non-performers with equal abandon a way to lift the ethics of the human race (no pun intended) or demoralize it?
What I'm saying is: yes, we MUST renounce horse slaughter in this nation, but we must also be willing to give up all of our own lesser hypocricies and all the deadening influences that accompany and, indeed, perpetuate slaughter.
Perhaps that's not a very politically correct thing to say on a horseraceinsider blog, but it's food for thought. Which has to be better for us than horse flesh, right?
15 Apr 2008 at 03:48 am | #
Anyone who loves horses and horse racing is almost compelled to feel emotional about this issue. One reason I'm a racing fan is, as Marion pointed out, I like horses more than some people I've met.
Nevertheless, there is one nagging question I've never heard answered.
Why do we, as Americans, deserve to tell other cultures how they should live and what their cultural values should be? Isn't that EXACTLY what has gotten us into trouble around the globe?
15 Apr 2008 at 04:27 am | #
It comes down to Doc how do you view a horse, companion demesticated pet or food. To me and most horse owners they are companion demesticated pets, they are family members. If more country's descided let's eat dog, would we supply them NO. You can not train a cow to carry you in war, be part of the police department, race, show,and many other things. We demesticated the Horse to help us and now they are being re paid by becoming some high class dopes dinner AMERICANS DON'T EAT HORSE MEAT....SAVE OUR HORSES
15 Apr 2008 at 06:30 am | #
To Doc Fonda:
We are not telling anyone else how to live their lives, we are just telling them that they cannot eat our companions, our athletes, our therapy helpers and our pets.
They simply cannot eat American horses.
If France, Sweden, Belgium, etc. believes this is acceptable, I'm sure that they can find another source for their plates.
15 Apr 2008 at 06:31 am | #
Black Beauty,
Actually, the original Americans, Native Americans, ate horses when the animals could no longer serve for riding or other work. Given the hardships of their lives, they would have been foolish if they didn't.
And your response didn't answer my question. Of course, the vast majority of Americans don't eat horsemeat, but why should we tell people who live in the rest of the world they can't?
I have no problem with the ban of slaughterhouses in this country. There is no reason we should help others to indulge.
Nevertheless, the bottom line remains the same, Americans almost always believe we know better than the rest of the world.
15 Apr 2008 at 07:31 am | #
Hi, Doc,
Ahhhh, it has nothing to do with "knowing better" than the rest of the world. I realize that every culture has norms that are acceptable, and--within the context of that society--are morally, ethically and emotionally acceptable. It IS culturally acceptable in other countries to eat horsemeat--and of course the Aboriginal Americans had to do so, in order to live.
That's not the argument. The argument is that, in 21st Century America, it's illegal to sell horsemeat, or cook to sell. So, since people in our country aren't eating it and do not have a history of doing so (or the palate)--I'm saying that it's immoral to kill animals which we think of as being companions in order to fill the plates of other nations.
(IF, indeed, feeding horsemeat to children in Somalia would save their lives--then I would condone the practice...but even then, it would have to be done in a humane fashion, and NOT just because a horse ain't cuttin' it on the track, or because they've become an "inconvenience.")
It's not arrogant Americanism that brings me to the conclusion that equine slaughter is immoral, Doc--it's the facts that:
* it's not legal to sell, or cook to sell, for meat in the US;
* that the horses are physically tortured and emotionally devastated during the process;
* that slaughter is used to get rid of horses who happen to be in the way, or who have lost their "usefulness";
* and that--perhaps the most compelling argument--equines are companion animals in this culture.
If we're repulsed by the thought of eating our neighbor's dog, ferret or kitten--WHY, in the name of God do we turn a blind eye to equine companion animals being cruelly destroyed to feed others?
For MONEY? That's not only obscene--it's a sin.
Whether or not it's culturally acceptable in France is not the issue: let them eat horse. I'M disgusted, but I didn't grow up dining thus. But let them find another horse source. We have a MORAL obligation to protect our companions.
It's about morals, not rabid Americanism. And this IS a moral issue, for which--as Whit said--we will be held accountable. Kindness, love and respect toward our companions--two-legged and four-legged--is always rewarded, whereas greed will be punished.
If cruelty is the hallmark of the "human" race--I wanna be a hamster.
15 Apr 2008 at 07:39 am | #
Marion,
Good answer, thanks.
15 Apr 2008 at 08:19 am | #
Now, to me (and all i know about thoroughbred racing could fit in a thimble with room to spare...), this is a no-brainer. I'mo not a rabid animal rights kinda person, I am just against violence against...well, ANY living creature. Okay, maybe not cockroaches. Sue me. ANY endeavor, be it mental health, parenting or horse-breeding requires a teeeeeny bit of sacrifice, a bit of looking at the BIG picture, and the willingness to go above and beyond, even if it hurts a little in the short-term. Unfortunately,as a society,we've grown accustomed to having it OUR way, at any cost, RIGHT now, and the future be damned.
Well done, my sistah!! As far as being too emotional, well...anything you're passionate about requires...let's see...EMOTION!! Otherwise, you're just going through the motions, and we all know where that gets us!
SHOWERS of blessings on you!!!
15 Apr 2008 at 08:59 am | #
I respect your stance, and totally agree with ending horse slaughter. It is a bit disturbing that you are selecting TB racing as the primary source of slaughtered horses. This is not the case. From the numbers I have seen the large majority of slaughtered horses are Quarter Horses.
Althouth there is always room for lots of improvement, the TB industry as a whole does more than any other breed to try to rehome horses, and is one of the strongest opponents to slaughter. Admittedly, there are several scummy trainers that dump horses, but they are the minority, and the number of TB's bred per year is significantly lower than QH production.
Why is there this slant to your blog?
15 Apr 2008 at 09:47 am | #
Oh, good LORD, AprilK...I am NOT targeting the Thoroughbred industry as being the primary source of slaughtered horses--not at ALL. Did I SAY that? Uh-uh.
I'm IN the Thoroughbred community--I don't write about any other equine endeavours, because Thoroughbreds are my passion. I can only write TO the Thoroughbred community because I'm a member of it. If I wrote the same column in a Quarter Horse rag or website, my opinion wouldn't be recognized as being valid.
In fact, no QH 'site or publication would ahve me, because I have no legitimacy in that community.
Yes, unfortunately, the Quarter Horse community feeds the slaughterhouses far more often, and many more horses, than the Thoroughbred community. But I work and live in the world of Thoroughbreds--this is my neighborhood.
Not once did I say that the Thoroughbred owners/breeders/etc. are responsible for the mess. I DID indicate that--if you look at the amount of money represented at even ONE Thoroughbred sale (and the CLOUT that goes with that money)--we could pass the anti-slaughter bills in an hour. If all the wealthy people in Thoroughbred racing will pick up the phone and let Washington know that they WILL NOT TOLERATE it one minute longer--it WILL stop.
Money talks, horsepoop walks.
I can name hundreds of wonderful Thoroughbred people who are heroes in the fight against equine slaughter: John Hettinger, Suzie O'Cain and Robin Malatino are just three of the dear souls who are passionately leading the fight.
April, you read it that I'm blaming the Thoroughbred community for equine slaughter: I'm sorry that you interpreted it that way.
What I'd hoped you'd read is that this community of horselovers has billions of dollars at its disposal--and unlimited passion for the horses in our care. Let's use that money, passion and the power that goes with it, to demand that Washington--including George ("Nucular") W.--end the slaughter, now.
I can only write about the equine community of which I am a part, April. I grew up riding Quarter Horses and Morgans, starting at age four. But I haven't been on a QH in 20 years, so my opinion, to those in that community--would be moot.
I'm not sure if my opinion in Thoroughbred racing is valued by anyone, but--(*grin*)--I refuse to go away.
16 Apr 2008 at 01:13 pm | #
I'm just a lady with a couple of horses for pleasure riding and pets. Don't know much about Thoroughbreds, but you guys make me want to know more. I love your passion, enthusiasm, and commitment to change all areas of the horse "industry". And YES, we need to get busy addressing the breeders!
Doc Fonda - this has been addressed but I want to add my two cents worth. Let Europeans eat whatever they like. Let's just make sure they acquire it somewhere other than America.
17 Apr 2008 at 07:00 am | #
Your passion or obsession is profound to say the least. I applaud and also admire your willingness to take on such a heavy load. I would dare to say, it might even bare harm to your personnel health, as I can sense your blood pressure rise and fall like the oceans tide.
Aside from your, and others steady march to ban this ugly business, how does it stack up with DC's other issues
1. Mothers who have lost son's and daughter's in Iraq
2. The slumping or failed economy
3. Illegal aliens
4. Oil prices
5. The housing slump
6. Medical insurance
The only reason I bring these up, is to put the fight in perspective. If we think the rich people are the only ones who can make a difference, then we are pampering to the losers. What makes this country work, is the middle class. So I think your best shot on getting things done, is with the people like myself, who will sign petitions, make the calls, and send the letters to their Legislators.
My letter went out today, and I intend to bring 10 people with me. If everyone did that, we will be heard.
Best of Luck on this journey of Humanity.
DH
17 Apr 2008 at 07:30 am | #
Dead Heat:
Bravo! You are right on the money.
Thank you for joining us, and I hope that we are heard.
Best,
Marjorie
17 Apr 2008 at 09:33 am | #
Marjorie,
I don't normally paiste articals, but this is one that shows how some are in the industry. As sad as this may be, there are very many Great people too!!!
Little Cliff rescued from slaughter
by Ed DeRosa
Little Cliff, one of two horses owner Robert LaPenta named after the late turf writer and chartcaller Cliff Guilliams, was rescued from slaughter on April 7.
Christy Sheidy, co-founder of Another Chance 4 Horses rescue in Bernville, Pennsylvania, discovered the five-year-old Gulch gelding in a direct-to-kill pen in New Holland, Pennsylvania. He had last raced in a $10,000 claiming race on March 1 at Philadelphia Park, finishing seventh of nine and earning $170 for owner LA Buzz Stable. Trainer Ramon Preciado had claimed the horse from Jimmy Moran Jr. for $10,000 on January 13.
Sheidy ran the gelding’s tattoo and had Diana Baker, formerly of the Thoroughbred Retirement Foundation, pull a race record, which is when the connection to LaPenta and Racing Hall of Fame trainer Nick Zito appeared. Zito’s wife, Kim, is involved in horse rescue efforts as well.
“Mr. LaPenta and [Zito] sent a very generous check to Christy that more than covered [Little Cliff’s] expenses,” Baker said. “We couldn’t have asked for a better or more generous response than what we received.”
In a cruel twist of fate, Moran and Guilliams both died within a week of Little Cliff’s rescue but not before Nick Zito had a chance to tell Guilliams that one of his equine namesakes had been rescued.
“The Cliff’s Edge and Little Cliff were both named after [Guilliams],” Kim Zito said. “Nick had dinner with [Guilliams] just recently and told him what had happened to Little Cliff. [Guilliams] got very emotional and very upset.”
LaPenta purchased Little Cliff for $250,000 at the 2004 Keeneland September yearling sale and bought him back on a bid of $350,000 at the 2005 Fasig-Tipton Calder sale of selected two-year-olds in training.
Little Cliff finished sixth behind eventual Grade 1 winners and Central Kentucky stallions Political Force and Flashy Bull in his second career start before winning his next two races by a combined 6 1/4 lengths to close out his two-year-old season. At three, he finished third in both the Leonard Richards (G3) and Sir Barton Stakes. He won three of 27 starts and earned $202,762.
Although Little Cliff had changed owners four times throughout his life before being rescued, one thing that followed him from Kentucky to New York to Florida to Pennsylvania were his Jockey Club papers, papers that Kim Zito had affixed with a white sticker that says, “If this horse needs a home when he retires, please call.”
“The tragic part of this story is that Little Cliff had this sticker on his papers, and that breaks my heart because it proves that there are people in this industry who don’t give a [darn],” Kim Zito said.
Ed DeRosa is news editor of Thoroughbred Times
17 Apr 2008 at 09:22 pm | #
I wish that you had, in your piece, discussed the effects of the closing of the slaughterhouses: the horses starving in the woods and on farms because their owners can't take care of them, the agonizing horses are spending on trailers shipping north and south of the border. It's all well and good to stop slaughter, but not without considering the unintended consequences of prolonged cruelty to horses. There's a reason that many horse rescue organizations and people in the racing industry do not wholeheartedly embrace the anti-slaughter movement, and that is because they understand that closing these houses may well prevent this particular type of animal cruelty, but it spawns many others.
17 Apr 2008 at 10:10 pm | #
to Anonymous (interesting that you don't use your name)
That is a lot of horse poop!
Those stories of loose horses have been fabricated and we all have proof from officials in Kentucky and other states. In fact, that proof is in writing!
Please stop spreading your pro-slaughter propaganda, because that's all it is.
As for horses starving, horses were and have been starving while slaughter was going on in Texas and in Illinois. Those that are going to abuse animals are going to do it whether or not horse slaughter plants are in operation. It's just another lame excuse by the pro-slaughter folks who want to make a buck off the equine that has worked for them.
Do you really think that you can get away with outright lying and spreading nonsense on this forum? We are way too well educated on this subject to fall for it.
Shame on you!
18 Apr 2008 at 05:32 am | #
Of course I post anonymously; why on earth would I provide any personal information to people who so often communicate by attacking not only one's views but oneself? Your comment, Marjorie, is a case in point. If I could rely on the people involved in this debate to be even-handed and reasonable, I'd gladly post my name.
As for fabricating what you consider pro-slaughter arguments, I'd imagine that the New York Times
used multiple reliable, verifiable sources in the article linked below. I am not pro-slaughter; I am simply skeptical that outlawing slaughter without taking significant other measures supports horses.
It is unfortunate that what is a well-meant cause--reducing cruelty to animals--has been taken over by fanatics, as the personalities of the individuals has overtaken the merits of the cause.
18 Apr 2008 at 08:37 am | #
To Anonymous:
That was not an attack, I am simply tired of hearing that there are "loose" horses here and there and everywhere, because it is not true.
I am trying to get the names of the officials who said this and will be back to you.
If the people do not have slaughter to rely on, they will realize that they have to stop breeding carelessly. These animals deserve better than to be treated like an old sweater.
That article also states: "The American slaughterhouses killed horses quickly by driving steel pins into their brains..." - This is not the truth, because it is not quick at all. Horses are flight animals with long necks. They are using the process used for cattle and it is not humane for horses, because oftentimes that steel pin misses its mark and hits an eye, neck, etc. Those horses are continually shot with the bolt. Does that sound quick? Does that sound humane?
They are 'stunned' not killed this way, and then they are bled out, while they are still breathing!
They are also terrified by the screams and smell of blood. They are sentient beings, they deserve better than this. And, as the article states, in Mexico they are stabbed to death.
If we pass the AHSPA then horses will not be traveling anywhere to be slaughtered; that's the point.
18 Apr 2008 at 08:49 am | #
Passing the AHSP act is the goal, it appears that only laws make people even close to responsible , so if irrespnonsible horse owners do not have the disposal method of slaughter , they will have to re think breeding so many and if they can't take care of the horse hava a vet humanley euthanize it. No horse should have to endure the cruelty of what is going on now with the slaughter bottom feeder dealers hauling them to Mexico or Canada. We can never change people who will only do the easy way and the cruel way to make a buck. but we can change laws and we are.
18 Apr 2008 at 09:18 am | #
Marjorie:
You wrote: "That is a lot of horse poop!"
"Do you really think that you can get away with outright lying and spreading nonsense on this forum?"
Wow, I'd to see what an attack is, if accusations of dishonesty aren't one.
18 Apr 2008 at 09:23 am | #
Well, it is a lot of horse poop and it is outright lying.
If you are going to spread lies of unwanted horses roaming our country, then I am going to tell you that it's not true.
It was not an attack, it was simply stating facts.
21 Apr 2008 at 10:12 pm | #
To Anonymous:
Here are the links I promised you with all the information and credible reports that there are NO loose horses. Sorry for the delay:
http://www.kaufmanzoning.net/horsemeat/
http://www.kaufmanzoning.net/horsemeat/Abandoned_Horses_Report_Deleting_The_Fiction_12-23-07[1].pdf
http://www.kaufmanzoning.net/horsemeat/DeletingtheFictionPart2.pdf
http://www.kaufmanzoning.net/horsemeat/DeletingtheFictionShortPaper.pdf
23 Apr 2008 at 09:42 pm | #
Marjorie,
I never claimed that there were horses loose in Kentucky. What I said was that horses are suffering in greater numbers on farms and on transport vehicles. I am well aware of the articles you posted, and never sought to contest them.
If you can find authoritative information about the general welfare of horses being improved since the closing of slaughterhouses, I will read it with enthusiasm. While I respect the intentions of anti-slaughter legislation, I fear the unintended consequences.
23 Apr 2008 at 09:53 pm | #
Actually, there are documents proving that abuse in California decreased after horse slaughter was banned there.
If I can find that documentation, I will post a link.
24 Apr 2008 at 07:05 am | #
Anonymous, here is another wonderful article that tells the truth:
http://www.horsetalk.co.nz/features/horseslaughter-139.shtml
29 Apr 2008 at 10:29 am | #
Serious question..has anyone actually tasted horse meat? I'm sure the question may cause outrage but I'm really just curious? If cows could outrun horse we'd be stokin' them the barbie and watching the Bovine Cup in October. Society tends to dictate the acceptable norms. Provide me with a solution along with the problem. So far I've seen mostly complaints and a few frivolous irrelevant tangents of the economy, war etc.
21 May 2008 at 11:22 am | #
Does anyone have a list of the tracks who allow the sale of TB's to the slaughterhouses? I would like to boycott them.
21 May 2008 at 09:49 pm | #
I know Moutaineer in West Virginia is one. I'm not sure of the others, but I'm sure there are many.
28 Sep 2008 at 11:24 pm | #
I just now read this article after reading Part 1 and 2 on stopping Equicide. It's absolutely wonderful! Keep it up Marion! You're my kind of person! Tell it like it is.
28 Sep 2008 at 11:52 pm | #
Thank you so much, Joan...you are too kind. So many wonderful, pro-horse, anti-equicide people have responded to this weekend's article, and to my little rant here from April...now, if we all pick up the phone and call our Congresspeople TODAY...we'll end the insanity.
And I'll start sleeping at night. I actually dream about horses on their way to slaughter, looking at me with their big, gorgeous eyes and begging me to help them. We must intervene, as you know, Joan...John Pricci and I are so grateful that wonderful souls like you are reading and acting. Thank you so much.
14 May 2009 at 05:23 am | #
Death is better for these horses than a lifetime of being locked up and starved which happens to a mass number of these rescued thoroughbreds. If have seen what I see all the time you would understand and beieve the same. An eleven to twelve hundred pound horse is reduced to seven to nine hundred, the first one fifty goes in a few days. Thoroughbreds are not easy keepers, the well intended clueless rescuers just keep getting more until they are finally turned in and put out of business. They intended on placing the horses but no one wants them. These are the facts whether you people want to hear about the real world or not.
16 May 2009 at 06:42 pm | #
thanks for blogging Anonymous is good to see someone else out there blogging with common sense instead of pure emotion. yes the government paying out bonuses to thoroughbred owners and the greed of those owners to cause the greatest glut in the unwanted unneeded horses in this nation. people that don't spend a nickle on taking care of a horse have no respect from me about this issue. when you have been there and done that then you can speak. and yes for those who happen to have one or a few an off the track thoroughbreds, what about the other thousands?
02 Nov 2009 at 08:25 am | #
Well now many of these comments are over a yr old... So how is the no slaughter in the USA working out? More horses going over the borders, more neglect and abandonement cases.... How nice for those horses to have to endure. Especially those waiting for their "natural death" as alpha mare proclaims that is the only "humane" way for them to die. Apparently no form of euthanasia is acceptable??...... How nice for those that linger on in suffering situations.
Ranch Manager
http://backattheranch1.blogspot.com/
02 Nov 2009 at 09:31 am | #
How crude of Ranch Manager to use the word "nice" right alongside of "suffering".
You seem to be very smug, but the truth is that there are no more cases of abandonment and abuse than there were before the slaughter houses closed. In fact, there is probably less.
Horse slaughter is unethical and if you are pro-slaughter, it means that you have no morals.
Go slide back under the rock you emerged from.
02 Nov 2009 at 10:00 am | #
I find it very interesting, to read the writings of people who claim to speak from a place of absolute neutrality, and Truth--when,in fact, they have a great deal invested in the topic. I find it confusing that someone who "ranches" horses hates them so much. Perhaps the ASPCA and HSUS should be alerted to #47's blogspot, because it appears to me that--cute little "horsie" cartoon, notwithstanding--you have more invested in killing horses than in loving them. The underlying message reads like an advocate for violence, to me.
In your blog, you refer to horses as being livestock--which, of course, is the place at which we differ, from the get-go.
And then you go on to prove that your blog is just an online tabloid: it appears that you've allowed the vehicle to delve into the arena of gossip-mongering, of junk-purveying. I find it reprehensible that you choose to try to tear apart John Holland, a genuine lover and defender of horses.
What you don't realize--I guess you weren't a philosophy major--is that an ad hominem argument("ad hominem" = "against the man") not only comes across as being childish, it negates your real argument. Trashing John Holland or anyone else who cares about preserving horses does not strengthen your own passion for the right to slaughter them--in terms of logical argumentation, it completely negates your own arument.
The minute you trashed John Holland--or whomever was your first trashing--our argument went down the ole' muck pile.
Were I Mr. Holland, I'd sue you for libel. Whatever you've written about him, anywhere:
a) if it's true, it's none of your business and
b) if it's not true, it's a lie written down--either way, you are responsible, it's on your 'site and you should be held legally responsible to pay damages.
I'm even considering suing ou, myself: I found reference to myself on your blog. And I LOVE it that you named me in the same breath as Rush Limbaugh. That is a tremendous joke, I was SO excited! I HOWLED in laughter, clapped my hands and flexed my right bicep.
This proves that you know nothing about those whom you trash, Ranch. I'm so liberal, so far to the left that I can see the edge because it's BEHIND me. Mr. Limbaugh could not BE more conservative--we are on polar opposite sides of the fence, regardless of the topic. I doubt seriously that Mr. L. and I could be in the same room and not verbally assault each other. (Although I would try to take The High Road. Really, I would.)
So, if you name both a conservative and a liberal as enemies to your cause--as "stand up comics," to be exact--then where DO you stand? (A big heads-up: You're much more likely to find colleagues in Mr. Limbaugh's camp, those who think that horses are livestock and livestock is meat, damnit--than you are over here on the left.)
Where DO you stand? Your blog seems to be a mishmash of that which you feel is humorous fun-making of those whose opinions you disdain--or trashing them, outright.
But I don't see any intellectual argumentation there, nothing that would stand up if presented to the the Supreme Court. Reasons WHY horse slaughter should, reasonably, be allowed--other than that you find horses to be disposable. And that argument doesn't hold up on the floor of Congress.
And isn't that the very same thing of which you accuse US? Of writing from emotion and not from reason? Interesting when the horseshoe's on the other hoof.
Your blog makes me curiouser and curiouser, Ranch. You make fun of liberals and conservatives. You trash people like John Holland, a saint in the anti-slaughter cause.
You write a great deal of NEGATIVE things--but I don't read any positive things, any solutions.
Just a lot of venting, I guess. The very thing of which you accuse those of us on the anti-slaughter side of the fence.
Huh.
Food for Thought: (Pay attention, anti-slaughter people!): It would be extraordinarily sweet if John Holland and I--and every other anti-slaughter fighter who's been personally trashed on pro-slaughter blogs, including Ranch's--got together and sued them for libel, slander--"...whaddaya got," to quote James Dean.
And then used the money to fight the pro-slaughter, pro-horse-ranching Ag lobby.
THAT would be righteous. Really.