Our athletes have a major disadvantage over the tight end of the Dallas Cowboys in that they are lacking opposable thumbs. (Does that sound odd? I actually believe that the only reason why humans, and not other animals, get to make the decisions on this planet is that they lack that thumb. Can’t drive cars; work a computer; dial 911. If horses had thumbs—you’d better believe that the sport would shape up a lot differently, on every level.)
If the horses had an easier time of getting their thoughts through to the humans in their lives, they’d most likely request—loudly and strongly—that we cease and desist with the overbreeding of their kind.
Compared with other breeds, Thoroughbred breeding is downright genteel. Everyone knows that. In the case of, say, American Quarter Horses—breeders run amok with the AI. It’s disgusting that a single American Quarter Horse stallion can be responsible for 5,000 foals every year. And that overbreeding leads, of course, to New Holland and the killing fields because those horses are considered to be very, very disposable. Don’t like that shoe? Toss it out. Horse eating too much? Ship her to Texas via New Holland.
But we in American Thoroughbred racing and breeding are guilty of overbreeding on our own level and it must cease and desist, ASAP. I remember hearing Suzie O’Cain (Stallion Manager, Highcliff Farm), stating flatly that the way to stop slaughter is to stop creating Thoroughbreds willy-nilly. And she’s right: I know a breeder who makes horses like a drunken sailor.
Some breeders (including owners) go ga-ga, absolutely blind with glee, when they think about the potential for earnings. And, sadly enough, the earnings that mean the most in racing these days is not on the track but in the breeding shed.
All starry-eyed and running to the bank, the majority of American Thoroughbred breeding has become nothing more than a low-class sex factory. Stallions are known to cover up to four mares a day, in their owners’ wild-eyed quest for Mo’ Money. Some stallions cover 150 mares a year.
Not only does this overbreeding lead to early deaths of the stallions (think about it—Horsie Viagra or no, it’s actually a lot of stress on a stallion to do…that…four times a day)—it’s watering down the herd, literally. The same stallions are being used over and over, regardless of the quality of the nick. The breed (at least in the US) is becoming an incestuous little community, where everyone is everyone else’s sister’s half-brother’s mother’s uncle.
What will this do to the breed in another generation or so? What is it doing to the horses who are produced in this greedy fashion?
I don’t have all the answers, but I’m here to tell you today that one man is standing out as My New Hero: Sheikh Hamdan bin Rashid Al Maktoum. God bless Sheikh Hamdan. He recently announced that two of his Shadwell stallions, Horse of the Year, Invasor and Classic winner, Jazil, will each cover only 85 mares per year, period.
His Highness’ reasons for this decision are those that I just stated: That the breed is becoming watered down, and weaker horses are being produced. He’s looking out for the health and welfare of the horses, themselves. Imagine that, an owner and breeder who loves his horses and creates a policy to prove it.
I love Sheikh Hamdan for taking this bold stand and wish I could shake the Sheikh’s hand, to thank him. He may be only one voice of reason and morality at this time—but he is one. And that ethical stand will hopefully become contagious as others catch on to the genuine goodness of his decision.
Now don’t get all in my face. I know a ton of Thoroughbred owners, breeders and others in the industry who love their horses, a great deal. And they’re not all in the position of a Sheikh, who can make the fiscal decision to not overbreed.
But if others in this industry would just take a step back and BREATHE for a minute…and THINK about the future of the horses, the breed, the sport and the industry…perhaps, just perhaps, we’d come up with some universal policies about breeding. Policies based on morals, ethics and concern for the health of our equine charges.
As long as Thoroughbreds lack thumbs we will continue to make the decisions for their lives. And those decisions must be based on love, respect and concern for the horses.
So you can’t afford to not overbreed? Don’t really love and respect your horses enough to make your business decisions based on compassion? Get another job. Frankly, I’d rather think that the horse I buy at Fasig-Tipton in Saratoga next year has an IQ higher than a rock and legs strong enough to carry her around the oval without shattering into sand. If we keep overbreeding Thoroughbreds, we will hear the peal of the death knell for the sport—and that bell will be rung by our very own hands.



16 Oct 2007 at 03:14 pm | #
Marion,
Love your passion. Or, to paraphrase The Shangri-Las, that's why I fell for the leader of the pack.
John
16 Oct 2007 at 06:28 pm | #
John, John, John,
I stand in awe of your far superior wordsmithing talents...I humbly say, Grazie
Danke
Obrigado
Gracias
Thank you, for everything...
30 Oct 2007 at 07:18 pm | #
There is one other farm in KY that for years has limited the amount of mares that go to their stallions. That farm is Claiborne.
A few years ago I had a mare that on paper looked like she could produce a GrI winner if bred to Devil His Due. Sorry, his book is full. So I went to my friend Charlsie Cantey, I knew she had their ear, she called me, nope, not even if the President called them would they allow it. His book is closed. Now, I'm not sure how many mares he had to the stallion, but I know it wasn't 100. It was much less. They like to do things the old fashioned way, the time honored way of years past.
Did I get angry? No. I appreciated what they did. Then I went to his son Devil's Bag. She got in foal, and guess what, no resulting foal. She aborted a blob. I guess it just wasn't meant to be.
But, I'm hoping against hope that more stallion managers come to their senses and start limiting the books of their stallions. I hope they actually start to look at the mares pedigree and what her family has done to see if it's a good fit.
I'd rather they start looking for quality over quantity.
And don't get me started about these horses being retired at the end of their 3 year old season.
05 Mar 2008 at 09:50 pm | #
I agree totally that stallions books should be limited. It will definitely over time reduce the number of " disposable " horses.
I'd like to raise another thought. What about the broodmares? Is it just me or does anyone else think that there should be an age limit and a number of foals produced limit? I very frequently see on the bloodhorse.com that mares are dying from ruptured uterine arteries or other complications due to foaling. Just this past week, Miss Alleged who won the Breeders Cup Turf back in 1991 ( not sure if that was the exact year but right around then ) died from a ruptured uterine artery the day after delivering a foal. The filly is fine and on a nurse mare. Miss Alleged was 21 years old AND had produced 13 foals!! Well no wonder she ruptured her uterine artery!! There should be an age limit for breeding mares and a limit on how many foals they can produce. It's no better than a puppy mill. Only difference is they can only produce one baby at a time. Miss Alleged isn't the only one that I've seen. There will be plenty more now that breeding season is here. Does anyone out there agree with me?
Kim