They stood and cheered when Whitney delivered her acceptance speech, and they stood and cheered again when Jerry Moss and his wife Ann accepted the elusive mounted gold-plated horse on behalf of their brilliant racemare. Zenyatta had won all 19 of her races before inches separated her from an undefeated career in the Breeders' Cup, and there were voters, dozens of them, who reckoned that that was enough to deprive her of the championship. A year ago, a win in the same race hadn't been enough to catapult Zenyatta into the throne room, and her legions of supporters--58,000 alone on Facebook, according to the New York Times--were girding for another disappointment this time. But the final vote was Zenyatta 128, Blame 102, and for the third straight year the winner of the Breeders' Cup's $5-million race didn't capture the title. There must be something about lucre that's a turnoff for Eclipse voters.
For many voters, a ballot for Zenyatta was a vote that made certain she wouldn't become The Best Horse Never To Be Horse of the Year. There are usually some strange results in a breakdown of the Eclipse voting, and the Horse of the Year totals bore this out. One voter abstained, and two cast no vote at all. The remaining five votes went to Goldikova, the French mare who's come to the U.S. and won the Breeders' Cup Mile three straight years.
Zenyatta was probably asleep in her stall, at Lane's End Farm in Kentucky, when the news of her conquest broke in South Florida. Even the tabloids haven't been able to root out the identity of her first suitor in the breeding shed. At the dinner, the Mosses said nothing about pitching woo, but the announcement is imminent, because the optimum breeding month is February, which allows for the standard 11-month pregnancy and a foaling in January. If the newborn amounts to anything, in theory he or she will be as fully matured as the rest of the early foals who make it to the Kentucky Derby. There are rumors that the Mosses are dickering to breed to A.P. Indy, another Horse of the Year, whose advertised stud fee is $150,000. If it happens, that romance would be a May-to-September affair. A.P. Indy is 22 if he's a day.
Standing next to Marylou Whitney as she made her speech was her husband, 40 years her junior. Her late husband, the tycoon C.V. "Sunny" Whitney, received a similar Eclipse 26 years ago. As the song went, I remember it well. That was the night we were up against a tight deadline, and Whitney began his speech about how he had founded Pan American airlines in 1928. By the time he moved along to 1984, and they subsequently made the Horse of the Year announcement, readers of the Los Angeles Times were assured that they weren't going to read about John Henry's title in the next morning's paper.
"My husband introduced me to this sport in 1958," said Marylou Whitney, who has recovered from a stroke she suffered a few years ago. "These horses have given me much more than I could ever give them. I feel most alive when I am around my horses. They are my family." She also spoke of fighting "to insure that there will never be another horse slaughter in America," and caring for backstretch workers so they can "improve their lives" and "we can improve their dignity."
A year ago, at the dinner in California, Jerry and Ann Moss sat at their table in stunned silence when it was announced that Zenyatta had been outvoted by Rachel Alexandra, whose record was impeccable but whose owner kept her out of the Breeders' Cup. This time, the Mosses kissed and hugged at their table before heading for the stage. Jerry Moss collected himself, thanked everybody in the room but the busboys, and eventually read a poignant passage that was written by Priscilla Clark, who runs a sanctuary for retired horses in California.
Behind the Mosses on the stage was Dottie Ingordo-Shirreffs. Both she and her men have had no small part in the Zenyatta phenomenon. Dottie has been the Mosses' racing manager for 25 years; her husband John Shirreffs trained Zenyatta; and her son, David Ingordo, was able to buy Zenyatta for the Mosses for the relative chump change of $60,000. At the auction, the unnamed, unraced filly had scared away several bidders because of a bad rash.
At the farm, Zenyatta got over her rash, was broken and was introduced to the clock, the measure of all fledgling racehorses. "You better get a good name for this one," somebody said. "Because either this one is very, very fast or else we've got a farm full of very slow horses."
When Zenyatta's name was called out in Florida, a look of relief filled Mike Smith's face. Smith was the jockey who rode for the last 16 of Zenyatta's 19 wins, but after the Breeders' Cup he was pilloried in some quarters for a faulty ride. Smith had been hard on himself for that ride, and with Zanyatta's racing career over, there was only one absolution possible. "After she got beat, this makes everything okay," Smith said. "Now I'm fine."


18 Jan 2011 at 07:09 am | #
Well, it is finally over. After hundreds of comments by turf writers and commentators at HRI, the HOY has been determined.
My HOY choice wasn’t even mentioned; actually I had many HOY selections during the past year; the selection being the horse who brought in the last leg of a pick three.
So, you turf writers and commentators, are you expecting a check in the mail or free admission to Del Mar or Saratoga for the coming meet from the owner and/or trainer of Zenyatta? Now that Zenyatta is HOY will you Zenyatta lovers pick more winners (that is if you gamble at all).
As I have read on many web sites how Zenyatta has put Thoroughbred racing back on the map, I sure would like to know just how.
------
Mr. Kling: In playing around with my daughters iPad I came across an article you had wrote for your paper titled, I believe, ‘Is racing a sport?’ Therein you mention that I had commented that ‘once out of the gate, one cannot tell the difference between an stake race and a claiming race’. You went on to say that you did not agree, and used as an example how Secretariat had pulled away to win by 31 lengths the Belmont Stakes; that a claimer couldn’t ‘cut’ those fractions.
A question for you? How did you know during the race the fractions Secretariat was running? It is impossible for the human eye to determine such without relying on an artifact: a timer! BTW, I have seen cheap claimers win by the length of the stretch, in what appeared to be scintillating fractions.
------
Well anyway, the HOY commentary to ad nauseam, hopefully, is over; now HRI commentary will shift to the road to the Kentucky Derby, which will obviously be dominated by what Pletcher, Dutrow, Asmussen, Mott, and Zito have in training - the usual suspects once again.
And the beat goes on ....
18 Jan 2011 at 07:41 am | #
Great to see that Mr. Corrow is posting again. Whether you agree or not with his perspective he brings thoughtful responses to the table.
I fell into the trap with Zenyatta because I appreciated her athletic ability, which but her in the winners circle nineteen times. Personally I could care less about the connections , where she ran, on what surface she avoided and on and on. Would I waste a dime betting on her nose? Hardly! I just enjoyed watching her athletic ability. Does that make her any better than that horse who jumped over two fallen horses in the stretch a few years ago down at Aqueduct on his way to winning the race? Absolutely not! It’s a heartless game and horses, trainers , owners and players come and go. It’s the nature of the beast. Once in a while it’s nice to acknowledge something special is all. Zenyatta was special.
18 Jan 2011 at 09:19 am | #
Wendell,
Good to have you back. I thought we’d lost you.
Like a jockey or exercise rider who has a ‘clock in their head,’ a good race watcher can get pretty good idea of the pace just by watching the lead horse or horses and how far they are from the rest of the pack. If you’ve done your homework handicapping the race you should have an idea which horses are going to be where in the running.
The Breeders’ Cup Classic won by Blame is a good example. You could tell the fractions were quick because of the way the field was spread out, but not blazing fast because 4 horses were close together.
18 Jan 2011 at 09:31 am | #
Wendell,
Welcome home! And I’m glad to see you’ve lost nothing off your fastball which, given your disdain for classy fast horses, might rightfully be called a slowball. And you even woke Kling up again.
(Sorry W, just my sad attempt at humor).
I’m sorry, but if you come back tomorrow, you might have to read another take on the Eclipses, mine, so you might want to get an early jump on those Parx PPs. (And I’m sure Vic will way in at some point).
On a serious note, glad to see that you posted and that all is well.
Tim,
Loved those last six sentences. Thanks, gents.
JP
18 Jan 2011 at 10:36 am | #
JANUARY 17, 2010
FOUNTAINBLEU NIGHTCLUB
MIAMI BEACH
HONORABLE RACING PUBLICATION REPORTER: Look, Blame beat Zenyatta fair and square! He beat her head to head. This vote was a joke!
FAN: But almost all of the polls done by the racing fans had Zenyatta leading 2-1. Does that count for anything?
HONORABLE RACING PUBLICATION REPORTER: What do the fans know? The fans are brain-dead gamblers who usually pick the wrong horse. At least they’re consistent! (laughing)
FAN: It’s attitudes like that that really turn me off to this sport. Not enough of people like you ever listen to US. WE are being taken for granted.
HONORABLE RACING PUBLICATION REPORTER: Look, we know what’s best for you. Go buy a form and start handicapping the pick-4 at Gulfstream, and buy some disk that will tell you how to bet it, RIGHT NOW!
FAN: Mr. Honorable Racing Publication Reporter, back in 1989, Sunday Silence beat Easy Goer 3 out of 4 times including the Breeders Cup Classic. Who did you vote for Horse of the Year?
HONORABLE RACING PUBLICATION REPORTER: You fool, Easy Goer ran a mile at the big A in 1:32 and change almost eclipsing Dr. Fager’s record!
FAN: But didn’t Sunday Silence beat him 3 out of 4? You know, head to head?
HONORABLE RACING PUBLICATION REPORTER: Barely, by a desperate nose and a desperate neck, that’s all.
FAN: Didn’t Blame only beat Zenyatta by a “desperate head”? What’s the difference?
HONORABLE RACING PUBLICATION REPORTER: The difference is Easy Goer was BETTER than Sunday Silence. Sunday Silence was a fluffball from California. I have never and will never vote for a California horse for Horse of the Year. California is the boondocks of horse racing.
FAN: Isn’t it true that your racing publication sells more of it’s product in California than any other state?
HONORABLE RACING PUBLICATION REPORTER: Did I forget to mention that Easy Goer ran a mile at the Big A in 1:32 and change?
FAN: Weren’t maidens going 6 furlongs in 1:08 and change that day? The track was lightning fast, wasn’t it? By the way, WHO did you vote for Horse of the Year, Easy Goer of Sunday Silence?
HONORABLE RACING PUBLICATION REPORTER: Oh, lucky me, my cell phone is ringing, I have to go pick up somebody at the airport. SEE YA! . . .
18 Jan 2011 at 10:49 am | #
Mary Lou and Zenyatta in the same paragraph, how classy can you get.
Mary Lou, I forgive you for never inviting me to the Ball. Congratulations!
TTT
18 Jan 2011 at 11:13 am | #
Zenyatta has been a great value, especially in 2009 when she won the Classic. She gave me 12-1 odds at the Wynn. I put in a huge bet on Zenyatta the day Rachel Alexandra won the Woodward. It was nice to cash a Zenyatta ticket in the thousands. Is that enough justification for HOY?
Also, I need to mention that she made Life is Sweet a huge underlay in the Ladies Classic in 2009. She gave me 2 huge Pick-4’s that day and a big win payout courtesy of Zenyatta’s greatness.
A good gambler will find value anywhere.
18 Jan 2011 at 12:30 pm | #
Mary Lou Whitney included in her speech ‘The beauty, the pageantry and the flair are what separate our sport from any other. As we look to the future, we must also pass on the passion and excitement of the sport to the next generation. It is our obligation’.
She’s right. Isn’t that what draws fan and hardened gambler alike? If that is not true, why do gamblers who grumble so about takeout then come back for more? Why not just sit in front of a slot machine mindlessly feeding it quarters? There does not need to be a divide between the fans, who supply excitement, passion and new bodies, and those who are dedicated horseplayers. This sport needs both to survive.
18 Jan 2011 at 01:17 pm | #
Karen,
With all due respect,the game needs more “players”, not more “fans”
Players contribute towards handle. Handle fuels purses. Purses attract owners.
Fans are nice, but if you don’t wager you have little effect on a racetracks bottom line. Yes, you’re there supplying “passion and excitement”,but you’re not supplying any money!
18 Jan 2011 at 01:23 pm | #
Gamblers are the truest fans. Nothing shows more support than putting up money. This comes from a 31-year-old guy who took a vacation to Arkansas “to go see some horse.” Co-workers thought my friends and I were crazy. We contributed about $3000 to Oaklawn’s handle that weekend. That is the support the industry needs!
18 Jan 2011 at 02:33 pm | #
Personally, I’m just glad it’s over. If either owner had really wanted the award, they could have run in and won the Clark and that would have settled things for good (maybe...). Still don’t think either one was the best to run in the US last year, but that’s just my opinion....
18 Jan 2011 at 04:16 pm | #
It brightened my day to see wmc in the comments list. I too feared for the worst. When JP wrote, “welcome home,” I’m sure it was heart-felt considering other feedback he’s received since wmc last posted.
The Z-girl finally got her due. Since racing didn’t blow that opportunity, maybe they’re also ready to take a cue from Bill Finley and start giving horseplayers theirs as well.
18 Jan 2011 at 05:48 pm | #
Gary & Wally,
Why dissing fans so bad? How do you propose to replace gamblers? Don’t you need to expose people to the sport to be able to attract new gamblers? That’s my point - you have to bring more people in the gate. Horse racing used to be the only game in town. It so emphatically is NOT anymore. Someone who wants to gamble has so many options and an empty, run down track is not going to attract many people. Yes, I know - most wagering is off track. But again, what sets horse racing apart? What will attract new players when there are so many glitzy casinos with all of their comps available?
18 Jan 2011 at 06:08 pm | #
Mr. Pricci, Mr. Kling, Indulto, and Tim:
Thanks for welcoming be back. Mr. Pricci and Mr. Kling will, no doubt, be the target of my cynical commentary forthcoming.
18 Jan 2011 at 08:00 pm | #
Thank you Karen for being a fan.
And to the rest of you curmudgeon haters of those who love the game for anything other than gambling, move along.
I have bad news for you. The vast majority of you lose money. You would lose money if the takeout was 0%. Most of you just want action, stop the whining, if you like crap 4K claimers at Parx better, good for you, please don’t share it in a way that discourages new and casual fans from enjoying the beauty and majesty of horse racing.
A public service announcement.
19 Jan 2011 at 10:28 am | #
ace7,
If not for “curmudgeon’s” like myself, you would have no game to love.
I equate people such as yourself and Karen to individuals who go to restaurant, take up a table for an hour sipping on coffee commenting on how good the food looks. Without ever eating any. Adding nothing to the establishments bottom line and basically taking up space.
19 Jan 2011 at 12:57 pm | #
Gary, while no one will ever be able to retire off what I wager, self included, I don’t know what you’re basing that statement on. I’ve been a follower of horse racing for 40+ years. I love this sport and have watched while it has shot itself in the foot to the point that it attracts very little attention from the general public and the attention it does attract is usually negative. That is not the way to keep an industry alive, let alone grow it. So what will it take to do that? The one thing that HAS to happen is that everyone interested needs to be welcome to the table - whether they are ‘just’ fans or dedicated horseplayers. Using your analogy of taking up a table in a restaurant, if the track is that restaurant, then it is a 1960’s diner with plastic seats with rips in them and a couple of other people who’ve been going there for decades hanging out in the other corner. Other than big name days, the other times I go to the track, I’m not doing anybody else out of a seat. This year, we saw something different. There was a mare who attracted thousands of fans and those fans increased attendance and handle, not to mention TV ratings, multiple times whenever she ran. There’s a lesson there, if the people involved in the sport want to listen.
19 Jan 2011 at 02:33 pm | #
Karen: Why is Thoroughbred racing today in the doldrums? Isn’t the primary reason the result of people finally having another option to gamble? Prior to 1980, Thoroughbred racing had a monopoly on gambling; subsequently casinos came into existence and the crowds that went to racetracks decided to go to casinos instead. Isn’t it apparent that the crowds that were attending racetracks were there to gamble, and now given an option chose to gamble elsewhere? Simply stated, the thoroughbred was not the attraction, the ability to gamble was.
Today Thoroughbred racing is being kept alive by slot revenue and casino dole. The management at the racetracks still operating fail to understand that they should be promoting the gambling options, not the next stake race - again, the thoroughbred, be it Zenyatta or another horse, is not the attraction!
For people to prefer slot machines to live racing is bewildering, since there are so many gambling options available when wagering on the horses (from 10 cents to a buck) to be second fiddle to slot machines is mortifying. The people sitting in front of slot machines, comatose, are totally unaware of what Thoroughbred racing has to offer, as Thoroughbred racing is controlled by a few breeders and owners who would rather die than admit that their beloved thoroughbred is not the real attraction - they are willing to go down with the ship; they simply refuse to promote Thoroughbred racing as the best gambling vehicle.
Thoroughbred racing is not a sport. Pletcher, Asmussen, Baffert, Zito, Mott, Dutrow, et cetera are laughing all the way to the bank as turf writers continually promote them and their horses, while there is no promotion of racing as a gambling venue.
There is not a person on this planet than can differentiate between a claiming race and a stake race, yet turf writers write volumes on the stake races, trained by the select few, that have a huge influence on the public, causing the public to ignore racing at numerous racetracks around the country, most of these racetracks very pristine and modern, offering precisely the same racing as the chosen few racetracks turf writers harbor.
Do you believe Thoroughbred racing would exist if there were not the ability to gamble on each race? Isn’t it all about gamble, about cashing tickets, about winning money?
19 Jan 2011 at 09:14 pm | #
wmcorrow, I agree with the first part of your first paragraph. Attendance and wagering dropped off in horse racing when other, more attractive, avenues became available. But I do not agree with the second half of your statement. What is the difference between gambling on horses or in poker? Why do you personally play the horses instead of going to a casino and playing poker (which also involves reasoning and strategy, unlike slots)? There has to be something that attracts and holds the attention. I’m serious - if it’s not the horse that does that - and that includes pedigree, PP, trainer, etc - what is it?
And as for the horse not being important, how do you explain the substantial increase in attendance and takeout when Zenyatta ran?
20 Jan 2011 at 05:15 am | #
“ace7,
If not for “curmudgeon’s” like myself, you would have no game to love.”
Gary Walker-
First, I can guarantee you I have place larger single individual wagers than you have.
Second, racing doesn’t rely on you whining curmudgeons anymore because we are aging and dying off.
The new fan base, if there is to be one, will be largely comprised of the casual bettor and casual fan who comes to casual fun promotions.
Please do your best to show them the best side of the game, not your old sour side.
20 Jan 2011 at 07:03 am | #
Karen: I prefer horseracing to poker as I find the handicapping of a horse race more challenging than poker or any other form of gambling; plus, I seem to do better financially. Thoroughbreds are beautiful animals and I hold them in high regard, but I also know that it is impossible to tell one from another up close or at a distance; and, all races look very much alike with the speed of the race undeterminable by the human eye. Thus, IMO, Thoroughbred racing at Finger Lakes or Zia Park is absolutely no different than racing at Del Mar or Saratoga. Unfortunately turf writers don’t think so, the result being that the vast majority of potential horserace gamblers only follow what turf writers hype.
The substantial increase in crowds and handle when Zenyatta raced were not sustained after she raced; the increases were the result of media hype, led by turf writers, which interested the casual bettor, the novice, and the ‘something to do crowd’, all back in hibernation until the next media hyped thoroughbred comes along.
The horse to me is not the attraction, the ability to gamble is; the horse is merely a means to an end - no different than cards or dice; they are merely participants in a race that I analyze via past performances, hoping to select the winner.
20 Jan 2011 at 10:00 am | #
Ace7:
Don’t “assume” that you’re a larger player than me. Not that it matters but I suspect you’d be surprised.
Also don’t “assume” I’m an aging curmudgeon. Unless you consider 42 old.
I’m done with you. Go bet some losers and rip some tickets.
20 Jan 2011 at 02:04 pm | #
I’m sorry you are so sour already. Good luck. Now go home and get your shine box.
20 Jan 2011 at 05:42 pm | #
wmcorrow, thank you for the thoughtful answer. Maybe only one out of a hundred of the new fans will stay in the game. But that’s one more than would have if it weren’t for the fans that the horse has attracted. If the publicity of Zenyatta brought in 30 or 40 thousand new fans, and I think that’s a light estimate, and one out of a hundred of those stick around, that’s 300 or 400 new players. That’s not too bad for one horse, is it? Bloodhorse has a blog about Zenyatta right now and one of those fans made the comment that to really honor Zenyatta (and these are ‘just’ fans we’re talking about), that the fans needed to continue to go to the tracks and support the sport, ie wager. Quite a few of those ‘fans’ agreed. So what other suggestions are out there to attract new people, people who have never given horse racing a thought? Lowering takeout is fine for keeping people from leaving, but I think it will take more than that to bring in new ones.
20 Jan 2011 at 07:36 pm | #
Karen: Gamblers are fans and fans should gamble to support the sport. I’m not dissing fans. I’m a fan first and then a gambler but to me they go hand-in-hand in horse racing. I flew to Arkansas and Kentucky to see Zenyatta race this year. I’m just saying that the best fans in this sport are the ones that gamble on the horses they love because they keep the sport alive.
20 Jan 2011 at 07:51 pm | #
We’re in agreement then. But there also needs to be acceptance of those who don’t gamble, who just love the horses. People gamble on football games, but you don’t put down or tell to leave those that don’t. Who would want to go to a football game without the masses of cheering fans, especially the ones painted blue or orange or whatever. Some gamblers have a nasty attitude to those who are fans because they love horses and that will not attract the new people who are the future of the sport.
16 Feb 2011 at 02:21 am | #
I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoyed every little bit of it, I have you bookmarked to check out all the new stuff you post.
aion kinah
wow gold
Aion US CD-Key
buy wow gold
Buy Maple Story US Mesos
Maple Story US Mesos
cartier watches
cartier necklaces
cartier pens