The 1994 Big 'Cap was decided by Pedersen and two of his colleagues, who ruled unanimously that the first-place finisher, The Wicked North, had interfered with the horse who ran fourth. The Wicked North was moved down to fourth place, and Stuka, beaten by almost two lengths and not involved in the alleged foul, was declared the winner. At The Derby, that night, Pedersen looked over to the next table, and the first person he saw was Phil Hersh, who owned The Wicked North.
Chip Sturniolo, who owned The Derby in 1994, recognized the juxtaposition of the Pedersen and Hersh parties. Sturniolo came over to Pedersen and whispered: "Pete, you know we could put you upstairs if you want." When Woolf owned the restaurant, he lived on the second floor, in a cozy apartment, and afterwards one of the rooms was converted into a private dining room, used only on occasions when eight or 10 regular customers sought privacy.
"No," Pedersen said, politely waving Sturniolo away, "we'll be all right."
After the race, an embittered Hersh promised that he would appeal the stewards' ruling. He did, too, unsuccessfully. Hersh and many others felt that the stewards had a vendetta against The Wicked North's jockey, Kent Desormeaux, who had been fined and lectured to several times when he failed to ride out beaten horses, costing them higher placings.
"Both of our parties ate our meals in peace," said Pedersen as he recalled that night. "The Hersh group finished first. Mr. Hersh got up to leave, and stopped briefly at my table. I thought, 'uh-oh, here it comes.' But he leaned down, and all he said was: 'You know, today was a very tough day for both of us.' Then he left. He saved my life when he said that."
I had called Pedersen not to talk about The Wicked North and 1994, but to discuss the 2011 Santa Anita Handicap, which had been run the day before. A groundswell of opinion thought that Game On Dude, who beat Setsuko by a nose in a tremendous duel, had initiated some bumping incidents in mid-stretch that cost Setsuko the race. The 90-year-old Pedersen, who worked as a steward for about 60 years before his retirement several years ago, has been on the hot seat for some of California's most high-profile disqualifications. Besides The Wicked North, Pedersen had something to do with Perrault being disqualified in favor of John Henry in the 1982 Santa Anita Handicap, and he was also in the stand at Hollywood Park in 1984 for the first Breeders' Cup--when Fran's Valentine's number was taken down on the undercard, and Pedersen and two associates had to sort out the $3-million Classic, in which Wild Again's victory was allowed to stand following a melee with Gate Dancer and Slew o' Gold during the stretch run.
"I was there Saturday," Pedersen said. "Saw the race, watched the replays a number of times."
And? Tom Ward, one of the stewards for the 2011 Santa Anita Handicap, was one of Pedersen's partners in the stewards' stand for dozens of race meets over the years. The 2-1 decision for Game On Dude's number staying up was Ward and Scott Chaney for, Kim Sawyer against. But I knew that Pedersen wouldn't pull any punches.
"It wasn't an easy call," Pedersen said. "But I would have voted for disqualification. I don't think there was any question that the winner interfered with the horse (Twirling Candy) between him and (Setsuko). That started the chain reaction. And there was enough interference to merit a disqualification."
Much was made of Chantal Sutherland, the rider of Game On Dude, getting to talk to the stewards twice on the phone as they took 12 minutes before taking a vote. But it turns out that Victor Espinoza, who rode Setsuko, also picked up the phone twice, according to the Daily Racing Form. The objection by Richard Mandella, the trainer of Setsuko, was that Bob Baffert, Game On Dude's trainer, got on the phone with the stewards. Ward told the Racing Form that Baffert spoke briefly, for only a matter of seconds, and Ward said he wouldn't have taken the call had he known in the beginning that it was Baffert and not one of the jockeys.
The day after the race, Mandella said: "I said (after the race) that I had no comment, and I don't want to drag the game down by saying anything now about the (stewards') decision. I think they should talk to the jockeys, but I think it was chickenxxxx that Baffert was trying to talk to the other jockeys and to the stewards. I was trying to be a gentleman, and unless the trainer is claiming foul, I just don't think it's right that he is trying to talk to the jocks and the stewards."
Baffert has never been shy about punching in the stewards' number, sometimes in the strangest of circumstances. Prior to the 2001 running of the Haskell Invitational at Monmouth Park, Baffert realized that he had erred in giving Point Given's jockey, Gary Stevens, last-minute instructions. Baffert told Stevens to have his whip in his left hand leaving the gate, when what he meant was the left hand for the stretch run, to discourage Point Given's lugging-in tendency. Baffert called the stewards, who relayed his wishes to an outrider, who caught up with Stevens shortly before the horses reached the starting gate. Whether the stewards should be used as conduits for race strategy is an arguable point.
Point Given won the race, and went on to the Horse of the Year title, and you would have thought that everything was hunky-dory. Uh-uh. Stevens was livid. "Obviously, the stick has to be in my left hand," he said after the race. "I don't know if (Baffert) thinks I'm a (effing) idiot or what. It didn't need to happen. It was a joke to me. Come on, I've been riding for 22 years, and I'm getting instructions three minutes from the gate?" The losers don't have a corner on weeping in horse racing.


08 Mar 2011 at 08:36 am | #
Mr Christine you didn’t give your opinion. In my view they did the right thing and not because I had the exacta and the winning horse but Twirling Candy wasn’t ever going to win the race. In the words of Baffert the horse was dead. Also when they showed the rear shot Twirling Candy clipped heels with Game On and that to me started the chain reaction. For once I was on the right side. Your opinion would be greatly appreciated. To suck up I look forward to your columns every week. You’re a helluva writer.
08 Mar 2011 at 08:56 am | #
Pete Pedersen is one of our all-time greatest stewards and has my highest respect.
I wish he had been involved the decision for this version of the Santa Anita Handicap.
I wish we had more stewards with his wisdom,integrity,humor,knowledge and balance.
The current roster has big shoes to fill.
Thanks for a great run, Pete.
Roger Way, A horseplayer.
08 Mar 2011 at 09:55 am | #
No matter what anybody’s opinion is on whether Twirling Candy or Game On Dude started the mess, I still think Chantel Sutherland should be suspended/find for her mistake. She made a novice error going to the left hand in that situation.
08 Mar 2011 at 10:59 am | #
Thank you, Mr. Christine, for the interesting read.
I would have to agree with Mr. Pedersen.
Setsuko was interferred with (twice) and that cost him a Grade I win. The fact that Ms. Sutherland chose to hit left-handed DID make an impact on TC, which then had an impact on Setsuko.
I’m sure it was not intentional, BUT most certainly, a poor choice at the wrong time, and she should OWN it.
Not that it would make any difference, but I hope the owners appeal this.
08 Mar 2011 at 12:02 pm | #
A creative twist in all the rehash, an interview with a steward heavily criticized for taking down a horse in the Big Cap regarding stewards heavily criticized for not taking one down.
So simple and yet so clever. Bravo Mr. Christine.
08 Mar 2011 at 01:57 pm | #
Bill,
Great column.
I was there and had Setsuko covered on a Pick 3. Sutherland drifted Game on Dude out while she was coming out of the tune, four wide, closest to the rail. This resulted in Twirling Candy being herded over to Setsuko, which started the problem. Sutherland then made it worse by repeatedly going to her left hand. But for him getting bumped hard twice, Setsuko would have won the race.
That’s horse racing, but the non-DQ will not be forgotten.
08 Mar 2011 at 04:26 pm | #
jr1801, thanks for your comments. I gave an opinion in an earlier post ("When a Steward Needs a Friend"). I thought Game On Dude should have come down. When Twirling Candy bounced off Setsuko and headed back in Game On Dude’s direction, there was still daylight between Twirling Candy and Setsuko while Sutherland was whipping her horse. Sutherland hit her horse twice before Twirling Candy made contact with her horse. Game On Dude was already headed toward Twirling Candy before there was contact between the two horses. I agree with the dissenting steward, Kim Sawyer, who said: “I thought (Game on Dude) stepped out when Twirling Candy stepped in. (Game on Dude)was part of the initial infraction that bumped Setsuko and should have been DQ’d. I watched it over and over again and saw it the same way.”
08 Mar 2011 at 07:27 pm | #
Pete Pedersen is a wonderful human being, but he was wrong on Perrault and he’s wrong on this Big Cap. Espinoza was race riding and so was Chantal. They both wanted to make it tight for Twirling Candy and Rosario. The intial contact was caused by Twirling Candy shying from Setsuko bumping Game on Dude’s hind end. Sure, Chantel did not stop riding and being turned sideways caused her to come back and bump Twirling Candy. Espinoza had every chance to win the race and got beat. He complained the air got knocked out of his horse, hell how did Game on Dude surrive being knocked sideways? The comments he made about the stewards would have got him a big fine in the NBA or NFL. How about it stewards? Now there is ruling that needs to be made.
25 Mar 2011 at 04:25 am | #
now i encounter the same troubles about Nike Shox R3, and i donot know on how to solve the issue. thankgod i look yahoo and discovered your post, it helps me get rid of my trouble about Nike Shox R4 . thanks once more o just one thing, may i paste your entry on my site about nike shox nz? I will add the source and credit to your site. regards!
15 Apr 2011 at 09:29 pm | #
It’s a nice post, thanks for sharing.By the way, i would like to share other good website: http://www.bags-seach.com/ These are from the latest styles and fashion trends handbags, top level quality and reasonable price, welcome to visit it.