LOS ANGELES, October 5, 2010--The best thing in "Secretariat," the new movie from Walt Disney Pictures, is John Malkovich. His wardrobe is out of Spike Jones and his part is supposed to be Lucien Laurin, Secretariat's tight-lipped trainer, but the way the role is written, Malkovich could just as well be Wayne Lukas. He's got a clever answer for everything and he's as droll as someone out of one of Noel Coward's drawing rooms. But while Malkovich is entertaining, what he can't donate to "Secretariat" is authenticity, something the film left in its other pants pocket. When Secretariat swept the Triple Crown in 1973, I was there, and it's impossible to sit through the picture without wondering why the director, Randall Wallace, shot a script that had so many holes and took so many liberties.
Penny Chenery, who raced Secretariat and who is superbly played by Diane Lane, knew going in that this was Hollywood, but even a resigned Chenery had trouble accepting that Riva Ridge didn't exist as far as Disney was concerned. It was Riva Ridge, the year before Secretariat, who won the Kentucky Derby and the Belmont, forging a career that produced more than $1 million in earnings and kept Chenery's family farm in Virginia from turning turtle. But for Riva Ridge's career, Chenery might not have even owned Secretariat by the time he turned three. In fact, Chenery told me that had her father, Christopher Chenery, died in November of 1972 instead of January of 1973, she probably would have been forced to sell Secretariat outright.
That part isn't in William Nack's terrific book, written 35 years ago when the poker was hot, but everything else is, and it would have better served the picture and the screenwriter, Mike Rich, if they had hewed to the source material more closely. The true Secretariat story really doesn't require any embellishment, there were enough bells and whistles to carry two films. But instead, what moviegoers will get are some cartoonish characters such as Nestor Serrano, playing an overheated Pancho Martin, the trainer of Sham, and James Cromwell, unfairly thrust into playing an Ogden Phipps who, embittered that he lost the rights to Secretariat in that famous coin toss, taunts Penny Chenery with second guesses at every turn.
At one point, Phipps makes Chenery a cash offer for Secretariat that would have exceeded the $6-million-plus that his breeding syndication brought. It's Wallace's way of showing that Chenery wouldn't have given up the horse at any price, even though Chenery says now that there was never a firm offer for Secretariat, from Phipps or anybody.
As for Sham, the picture leads you to believe that he won the Wood Memorial, a major prep for the Derby. The actual 1-2-3 in the race was Angle Light-Sham-Secretariat. Angle Light was also trained by Laurin, but owned by a fellow Canadian, Edwin Whittaker. Perhaps Wallace thought that the average moviegoer wouldn't be able to savvy two horses with the same trainer but different ownership, but in the process the film rewrites history by revising the finish of an important race. According to the Nack book, Chenery and Whittaker had nasty words by the time their horses got to Churchill Downs, and that would have made for much better high drama than Ogden Phipps' feeble I-told-you-sos to Chenery throughout the picture.
Margo Martindale has a nice turn as Elizabeth Ham, the long-time secretary of the Chenery farm who is always there when Penny Chenery needs someone to lean on. I also liked Nelsan Ellis as Secretariat's faithful groom, Eddie Sweat, although a rabble-rousing soliloquy by Sweat on the eve of the Derby is over the top and embarrassing. The find of the film is Otto Thorwarth, the journeyman jockey from Arkansas who plays Secretariat's regular rider, Ron Turcotte. Thorwarth, who had never acted, was so good in early scenes that his role was beefed up before the film was finished.
They asked Thorwarth for help along the way, to make sure not too much was out of place, but most of of his advice went unheeded. He pointed out that Secretariat wouldn't be eating oats out of a common water bucket, and that Turcotte wouldn't be carrying his saddle around, and still be wearing racing silks, for hours after the crushing defeat in the Wood. But the filmmakers wanted Turcotte to do something that showed anger, and throwing a saddle carried the day.
At the screening I attended, Wallace said that the film had put together some of the best racing action ever photographed, but I thought most of the race sequences were ordinary, and a throwback to the way the movies treated the sport decades ago. Evangeline Downs and Keeneland as the Triple Crown venues were obvious imposters. The smartest thing Wallace did, for the Preakness, was to just use the actual rerun of the national telecast.
Ignored, along with Riva Ridge and Angle Light, was Penny Chenery's first divorce, from Jack Tweedy. The Tweedys' marriage was crumbling at the time of the Triple Crown, and would not survive the year after Secretariat's sweep. Marital discord? Divorce? In a Disney film? Only when pigs fly.
05 Oct 2010 at 02:16 am | #
You were always told when growing up if you are going to do something, anything at all do it right the first time so someone does not have to come behind you and clean up your mess. The story of Secretariat’s would of been told and shown from[ home movies from the family that owned the horse and fans that were at the three races of the triple crown that took pictures and shot film with video recorders and race replays with jockey and trainer insight from the past and present]. What a waste of money and talent and a false glimpse into the past.
05 Oct 2010 at 02:22 am | #
That year that Secretariat won the triple crown was bigger then the World Series and the Super Bowl combined and to do a crappy movie like that is a shame, a real shame.
05 Oct 2010 at 02:35 am | #
Say it ain’t so Bill; and I was really looking forward to watching it. Hollywood bastards!
05 Oct 2010 at 03:51 am | #
I’ve followed the progression of this film and the news was clear throughout that it was to be more tailored around Penny then Secretariat. Even then they would make this a Disney picture and all that goes with it. No need to confuse viewers with who Riva Ridge was, Big Red’s Eclipse at 2yrs old, or use Lucien’s French-Canadian accent.
If anyone wants to see one of the best overviews of Secretariat track down ESPN’s Sports Century 50 Greatest Athletes video on Secretariat. It is a gold standard for the use of past video and assorted interviews with a solid narrative.
05 Oct 2010 at 06:29 am | #
To bad the movie missed out a lot of things. Disney did fail big time.
=======================
“I’m going to make him an offer he can’t refuse.” -Don Vito Corleone, Godfather (1972)
Watch movies online for free here:Movies Online
05 Oct 2010 at 12:05 pm | #
This movie isn’t for the racing fan and I won’t be bothered with it. However, I hope it does well. And that Diane Lane is kinda attractive.
05 Oct 2010 at 03:59 pm | #
Thanks for confirming my suspicions about this movie. From the previews I’ve seen, I had doubts that they mentioned Riva in the movie. And I also thought Malkovich’s character bore little resemblance to Lucien Laurin. I recall Mr. Laurin as a dignified man but in the previews I saw little dignity in Mr. Malkovich’s portrayal.
It’s really too bad because now people who weren’t around in the 70’s will think this movie is gospel on Secretariat and his connections. I expect Wikipedia will soon be updated to “fix” the real biographies to match the movie characters ;-}
05 Oct 2010 at 05:10 pm | #
When you see how Hollywood distorts things, why do we believe them when they endorse anything political?
05 Oct 2010 at 06:16 pm | #
Bill, considering that people in Hollywood - on the day they turn one year older, tell the press that they are two years (or more) younger - it’s an amazement that the movie was made with horses with four (not three & not five) legs.
Having seen the all-time Great Sugar Bomb horse racing film (“Sea Biscuit,” out of Sappy Melodramas & Hollywood HasBeens), I’m not falling for the same Favorite Trick twice. Someone else will have to buy a ticket.
Why support Disney Films when, simultaneously, they consistently butcher their ESPN racing telecasts?
If you’re looking for quality fiction, read H. Allen Smith’s comedy (a bestseller, by the way), “Low Man On A Totem Pole” (1941; inexpensive, used copies can be had on Amazon).
Or pick up a DVD copy of “First Saturday In May,” the great (non-fiction) film about the 2008 (Barbaro) Derby made by the talented Hennegan Brothers (probably also available on Amazon, etc.).
But the main point is, thank you for the lengthy, thoughtful review. It’s good to both see that someone is paying attention, & to discover facts that we otherwise probably wouldn’t know.
And with Otto’s success, we do have a good reason to be cheerful about a film that otherwise will always be noted for its avoidable deficiencies.
06 Oct 2010 at 09:30 am | #
Thanks for the laugh Don Reed. Your comments are especially amusing to me because Ms. Lane herself is among the Hollywood-ites who have regressed in age. Back when she started her career she was exactly my age but now she’s miraculously become 5 years younger than me. Truly amazing feat that I wish I could perform.
As for the movie - somebody should’ve told Disney if it ain’t broke don’t fix it. The real Secretariat story was so much better than the film version.
And I second Mr. Reed’s thanks to the author for his thoughtful review. And thanks too for not jumping on the “but it’s good for racing so i should pretend the movie is authentic” bandwagon.
06 Oct 2010 at 11:20 am | #
Theresa, are we talking about the one & the very same - my daughter, Diane Lane the actress, born only sixteen years ago?
Thank God she just got her driver’s license. Now I can read my newspaper in peace. While I’m doing my own driving & also texting & knitting & eating & handicapping (Mondays & Tuesdays, crosswords).
It’s hard to do all this on a mo-ped but I survive.
Speaking of which, Belmont needs a drive-thru betting window so I can handicap at the window without losing my AAA break-down coverage. What say we petition NYRA? Any chance we win? And if you lose in court, do you get place purse damages ($), anyway?
06 Oct 2010 at 11:33 am | #
Pardon, another think. I am studying English as 2nd lingo & need question answer.
This unusual way of saying it, “Hollywood-ites,” that which you speak of.
Does this mean that we refer to TV weather people as “meteor-ites”?
Another Thanks!
07 Oct 2010 at 04:07 am | #
Racetrackers need to take this film, along with any other racing film, with a HUGE grain of salt. We have to remember that in order to make the movie entertaining and interesting to the PUBLIC, the non-die-hards, it has to be less strict and regimented so they can try to understand it. While we shake our heads knowing all too well that jockeys don’t come to the barn in silks, the public doesn’t know that. While we ‘eye roll’ when we see the silhouette of the 3 year old colt --in training--standing peacefully in pasture, we know that the public cannot understand this is not normal.
It doesn’t matter if the movie is about medicine or law enforcement or baseball. All the people in those professions have the same reactions to a movie that isn’t 100% correct as we do to our industry based movies. But it’s not made for us! It’s made for the entertainment of the general public. And if this feel-good movie can inspire new fans of racing, then I’m all for it.
07 Oct 2010 at 05:39 am | #
Lisa J, points well taken.
But what I don’t get is why, within the contingencies of the story line, more accuracy could still have been used. Why did the jockey, in silks, have to go to the barn? Couldn’t he have talked outside the jockeys’ room just as well, like they usually do? And couldn’t Turcotte have been at the barn, in mufti, and picked up some tack and thrown it then? There are ways to make the dramatic points without distorting reality. Instead of letting Sham win the Wood, why not let Angle Light’s win stand, and bring in his owner, Edwin Whittaker, who would have been a useful antagonist? You know what I think it boils down to? Not ignorance of what’s what, or historical distortion for convenience, but out-and-out sloppy filmmaking. Yes, the general public won’t know, and won’t care, but why not please all of the people all of the time?
07 Oct 2010 at 10:00 am | #
The movie wasn’t made for horseplayers to enjoy, because horseplayers can see through the shortcuts and falsehoods presented as fact, but it was intended for the millions of players who are NOT horseplayers and are interested in the movie only as entertainment, and authenticity be damned! It’s the same with movies about police work; police laugh at some of the immediate solutions to crimes presented on screen! Movies about lawyers make lawyers cringe at the inaccuracies the screenwriters have imagined, so why should horseplayers, or horsemen be any different? Let’s enjoy the movie for what it is, an opportunity to hope that Diane Lane at least takes off her blouse!
07 Oct 2010 at 10:20 am | #
Chasham, thanks for your observation. Gee, I don’t know, every lawyer movie I’ve seen has been spot on. Except the one that indicated they could be trusted.
07 Oct 2010 at 04:07 pm | #
Bill: Apparently you haven’t seen any lawyer movies! I’ve seen many, if not most, of them and have never seen one that was, as you say, “spot on”! I must have missed the one that indicated lawyers could be trusted, because most movies seem to characterize lawyers as lower than child molesters, drug dealers and newspaper writers!
Keep the faith!
07 Oct 2010 at 07:00 pm | #
I was ribbing you, chasham, you’re right about the lawyer films. Sorry the joke didn’t go over.
07 Oct 2010 at 07:21 pm | #
Bill: Et tu, Brute! Sorry you didn’t realize it! I thought you knew that I really wanted to be a sportswriter and became a lawyer only because I couldn’t spiel!
07 Oct 2010 at 09:36 pm | #
And I wanted to study law, if only to learn the difference between torts and tarts.
08 Oct 2010 at 05:11 am | #
Have been big fan of yours even before AFFIRMED daze. In DRF Weekend, as well as this piece, you did your typical super job pointing out discrepancies, omissions and errors in Disney’s version of “Secretariat.” I am curious, however, about your glaring omission in delineating the current marriage to May Britt by Penny Tweedy’s second husband Lennar Ringuist: You mention that the Swedish actress had been married briefly to trainer Eddie Gregson, with nary a word about her subsequent marriage to “Mr. Entertainment,” Sammy Davis, Jr. Oversight, or deliberate, OR did DRF Disneyize your copy?
08 Oct 2010 at 11:49 am | #
Hi, Steve, thanks for commenting, and your kind words.
Don’t blame the Form, blame me. I didn’t put Sammy Davis Jr. in there (although it would have been easy to do) because this wasn’t about May Britt’s complete marital history, it was about my six-degrees-of-separation reference--four people (Penny Chenery, Lennart Ringquist, Eddie Gregson and Britt) overlapping in marriages and also having something to do with horses and Disney. Britt’s belonging in the story had nothing to do with her marriage to Davis, it was because she was married to both Gregson and Ringquist. Maybe it was a weak reference, and I should have stayed away altogether. If Davis had campaigned a Kentucky Derby horse, it might have made it easier.
09 Oct 2010 at 05:20 am | #
Dear Mr. Christine,
Thank you for an informative article. You filled in the blanks regarding many of my questions.
I’m taking a Scriptwriting course now, have taken Playwriting, and worked in Television “fluff” news for seven years. I understand the constraints of those formats. I understand how details get omitted for “the sake of the story” and have often been told that I am trying to cover too much for the audience to understand. I understand “artistic license.” The joy of knowing so many backstory details and figuring out how to present them is something I relish.
I saw the movie last night and thoroughly enjoyed it. My enjoyment is based on personal memories of the races and being a woman going through difficult times. The movie worked for me, and I am happy to know more of the true facts surrounding the events and people involved.
You’re completely right; this was a Disney movie. It just happens to be the Disney movie that allowed me a bit of respite, release, and rejuvenation. It is what I needed yesterday. Today I need more, so I’m looking forward to reading more about the true life and times of Secretariat and his families; both human and horse.
Thank you again for bringing so many interesting details to light. I feel as though I had dessert before dinner, and that’s not always so bad. I am still appreciate all forms of writing and respect your journalistic integrity.
As a side note: Yesterday before seeing “Secretariat”, I spent $1.50 at our local library on two autobiographies about two of our country’s most esteemed journalists; Edward R. Murrow and Walter Cronkite.
09 Oct 2010 at 07:06 am | #
Hi, Michelle, thanks for your kind words and glad you enjoyed the movie.
Cronkite liked to go to the Derby. One year, as we were leaving town with friends, he was at an adjoining gate at the Louisville airport. One of our friends wanted his autograph, and he obliged willingly. He signed it, “Wally Cronkite.” I can never envision Cronkite as a “Wally.” I wonder if he always signed that way?
09 Oct 2010 at 07:15 am | #
Take heart, folks.
I’m 34, so I wasn’t yet born when Secretariat took the Triple Crown, but my mom took myself, my son, my brother and his girlfriend, to see the film last night, as she was a huge Secretariat fan back in the 70s.
I have enough sense to know that any true story made into a Hollywood movie is going to have all sorts of liberties taken with the facts.
I was so amazed with the story that I immediately came home and began obsessively researching Secretariat… and I eventually stumbled upon this page, as I’m sure will be the case of many who are introduced to his incredible story through this film. I have learned more now than could possibly have been conveyed in the space of two hours, and I am grateful for the film being made in such a way that, I believe, gives viewers a strong desire to want to dig in and learn more.
09 Oct 2010 at 07:39 am | #
Hello again! Here is are two posts from “Forward @ 50”, http://forwardatfifty.blogspot.com . They are based on what I like and what I’m trying to achieve.
Majestic Prince
http://forwardatfifty.blogspot.com/2010/05/majestic-prince.html
Finding Sanctuary - Seeing “Secretariat”
http://forwardatfifty.blogspot.com/2010/10/finding-sanctuary-seeing-secretariat.html
I included a link to this article in my blog today.
Thank you, again.
09 Oct 2010 at 08:40 am | #
Great story about Walter Cronkite. I can’t picture him as a “Wally”, either.
My computer crashed while I was editing my blog this morning, but all is well now. Your link is in place.
Take care and Good Luck!
09 Oct 2010 at 02:35 pm | #
Did anyone else catch Jean Cruget in the background at te “Belmont Ball” depicted in the film? He is chatting someone up just behind Diane Lane/Penny Chenery Tweedy as she lovingly greets her husband, Jack. Keep an eye peeled for his cameo.
10 Oct 2010 at 05:51 pm | #
Altough I realize that the movie was not entirely truthful, I enjoyed it. Hopefully, it will generate sorely needed entusiasm for the horse industry in general. I was dismayed, however, to see the complete omission of Penny’s sister Margaret from the movie. She was my godmother, and I was hoping to see her at least mentioned. Thank you for writing an article that confirms that she did exist.
10 Oct 2010 at 06:10 pm | #
Why didn’t they just use the film of the actual races? What really bothered me is I’ve watched the actual Belmont Race about 500 times and can recite the track announcer word for word. It was a brilliant call, yet the movie made up it’s own call. Any diehard Secretariat fan will be disappointed, even with the so-called ‘glorious’ end that we all know is coming.
10 Oct 2010 at 06:29 pm | #
The Rona Butter Report -
“Re: Cinematic Missing Persons Bureau, Los Angeles Division -
“The Disney remake, ‘Iwo Jima,’ will feature a substitute (Robert Iger) as one of the five Marines lifting the flag to an upright position on Mount Suribachi (following the erasure of the actual soldier - & later Connecticut Senator - Sgt. Richard Blumenthal).
“The role of photographer Joe Rosenthal has been entirely eliminated (budget constrictions).”
10 Oct 2010 at 06:41 pm | #
I’m sure Rick’s good question is answered by the prohibitive cost to secure actual footage from the networks. At least they should have sprung for whatever the price to use Chic Anderson’s actual race call, rather than the absurdly tinny version on screen. And, I agree wholeheartedly with you, Bill, regarding the cringy, offensive, Stepenfetchitlike, “You gonna see something you ain’t never seen before!!” I read that director Randall Wallace almost always uses religious symbolism (think his masterpiece “Braveheart") to leave his audience spiritually uplifted. I doubt many know that the soundtrack from “Fiddler on the Roof” was played at AFFIRMED’s stall on the eve of the 1978 Belmont, and we all danced the hora to the tune of “Hava Nagila” back at the barn following his stirring victory over ALYDAR.
10 Oct 2010 at 06:48 pm | #
Cindy, I talked with Penny, and she, too, thought that Margaret belonged in the picture, at least for a cameo. Penny said that Margaret was as involved as her brother Hollis before they green-lighted her to run the farm and see if she could make a financial go out of it. Penny said that the 3 biggest omissions from the film, not necessarily in any order, were Margaret, Riva Ridge and Angle Light.
10 Oct 2010 at 06:50 pm | #
Great stuff, Steve Wolfson. Next time I dust off the Affirmed saga, I hope I remember to toss in the musical interludes that accompanied his Triple Crown. Best regards.
11 Oct 2010 at 03:18 am | #
Secretariat has been my hero since 1973; no baseball, basketball, football, or movie star, could ever take his place. He was a man’s man, a real man, just like me. His picture is above my bed to greet me each morning when I awake, and is the background for my computer and cell phone. Still have not gotten over the exhilaration 37 years later when I saw him cross the finish line at the Belmont. If asked if there was one person in history you could meet, who would it be. That’s easy, Big Red.
11 Oct 2010 at 07:34 am | #
Oh,Bill, lighten up. It was the story of Secretariat, not the story of Secretariat, all his relatives and all the relatives of his owners, trainers, jockeys etc… I loved it, it was a great escape, what I go to the movies for.. AND, the “never give up” message was great.
19 Oct 2010 at 10:51 am | #
Bill:
The film brought back so many wonderful memories,
notably taking my two eldest daughters, then 7 and 9, to visit Secretariat at his Saratoga barn, and
my associations with Meadow Stable, dating back to Casey Hayes, Sir Gaylord and Cicada in the early ‘60s.
But of all the factual errors in the film, the two that most bothered me were: 1) the foal was
clearly a bay, and 2) Penny didn’t hire Laurin for
Secretariat when the truth is that Lucien trained
Riva Ridge to Derby and Belmont wins for the family the year before.
Finally, maybe you can tell us whatever DID happen to Meadow Stud. Was the farm sold upon Secretariat’s retirement?
Best, John Piesen
19 Oct 2010 at 01:43 pm | #
Dear Mr. Pricci, Christine, Mr. Piesen, and anyone else out there who might be in the know:
I want to know if I’ve imagined this all these years, or did I really witness this as a young girl, being raised on Long Island and vacationing a time or two at SAR.
I’m nearly positive my parents took me to SAR sometime in the summer of 1973 (might’ve been 1972, when Secretariat was a 2YO), and we—and how many thousands of others at The Spa that day?!—were expecting to see Secretariat race and he did not? He was scratched from some race with (I believe) a slight fever but there were so many fans who were going to be there for Secretariat’s race that Penny agreed to let Secretariat out of the barn and he walked down the stretch to great applause, even though he would not be racing that weekend.
I *swear* this happened and that I was there. Maybe Bill Nack would know????
Can anyone verify please that the drugs I took in college have not hampered my memory? Thanks!
19 Oct 2010 at 01:47 pm | #
Dear Mr. Pricci, Christine, Mr. Piesen, and anyone else out there who might be in the know:
I want to know if I’ve imagined this all these years, or did I really witness this as a young girl, being raised on Long Island and vacationing a time or two at SAR.
I’m nearly positive my parents took me to SAR sometime in the summer of 1973 (might’ve been 1972, when Secretariat was a 2YO), and we—and how many thousands of others at The Spa that day?!—were expecting to see Secretariat race and he did not? He was scratched from some race with (I believe) a very slight fever but there were so many fans who were going to be there for Secretariat’s race that Penny agreed to let Secretariat out of the barn and he walked down the stretch to great applause. Probably NYRA was doing good PR back then.
I *swear* this happened and that I was there. Maybe Bill Nack would know????
Can anyone verify please that the drugs I took in college have not hampered my memory? Thanks!
19 Oct 2010 at 03:25 pm | #
Hey, Shu, we can’t rule out the faint possibility that those to whom you have posed your question also might be incapable of a definitive answer (due to their own possible misadventures along the lines that have you concerned about the reliability of your own memory).
Seriously, just kidding.
But what about the people, who have been abstained from all temptations for the past forty years, that have stated in sworn affidavits & on witness stands that they have seldom if ever seen NYRA “doing good PR”?
For instance, of late, with the movie coming out, you’d think that NYRA would do something of substance along the lines of publicity. They wouldn’t directly benefit from the box office proceeds, but doing something positive that might help to revive the long-dormant spark of interest in the sport is a good thing, no?
So a few days ago, here’s what surfaced along these lines.
A contest with tickets to the movie as prizes? Anything connected to a nice dinner at a decent restaurant somewhere in the Belmont & Saratoga areas? A donation in your name being given to a local deserving charity of your choice, should you win a contest not revolving around self-interest, perhaps?
Nope. To my knowledge, they did little, if anything (if they had done something, where was it publicized?).
But incidentally, the NY Post’s racing columnist, Ed Fountaine, did commendably gave it a good-will go.
This is not to slight his & other people’s involvement in the following, which is appreciated & applauded. But sadly, the episode points out the pathos of the sport in its present unchecked decline.
Fans were invited to travel to a borderline neighborhood in Manhattan to meet someone-connected-to-someone-else who had a connection to the actual Secretariat connections, in a tavern-bar-restaurant.
Back in 1973, they would have held the event at “21.”
19 Oct 2010 at 08:31 pm | #
Shuvee, I have no recollection of a Secretariat scratch, etc., and I’m sure that it would have been in the Bill Nack book had it happened. Secretariat had a fever the day Onion beat him. Could you be thinking of that? Penny Chenery told me recently that running him with abscess in the Wood was not a mistake, but running him with the fever at Saratoga was something that shouldn’t have happened.
19 Oct 2010 at 08:33 pm | #
John Piesen, the Meadow property was sold, but I don’t have the details. I think it wasn’t sold until a few years after Secretariat was retired. Penny Chenery leased it for five years sometime after that, but it didn’t work out.
19 Oct 2010 at 08:45 pm | #
Have been big fan of Penny and entire Secretariat team from outset, but abscess, fever, whatever else undisclosed prior to running, all seem wrong to me vis a vis betting public. Just imagine and compare to other sports where such information is divulged AFTER the fact.
20 Oct 2010 at 08:06 am | #
Steve Wolfson, you’ve gotten me to thinking about stuck horses. I’ve always wondered, if there’s a stuck horse in a race, shouldn’t it be announced to the public that the trainer wants out and the stewards won’t let him? But then, playing my own devil’s advocate, I theorize this scenario: They announce that Gnatnoop is a stuck horse. Then Gnatnoop wins by six. Then they tear down the grandstand. What to do you think? A classic example of a stuck horse was the one at Del Mar, several years ago, that was the impetus for Jerry Jamgotchian’s long-running monitoring of California racing. Jamgotchian wanted out of a race with a horse that he said wasn’t sound, but the stewards wouldn’t let him. Bobby Frankel was allowed to scratch a horse in the same race, and even had the Jamgotchian horse been scratched, there still would have been a field of eight or nine. The horse ran up the track and came out of the race injured. Should it have been announced to the public that the Jamgotchian horse was running against the owner’s objections?
20 Oct 2010 at 12:58 pm | #
Bill, just my personal opinion, but I believe it much better ethically, safetywise, and for gambling purposes to err on the side of caution and transparency. So many think the worst about our great sport anyway. Why give even more fuel for their fire? It seems much easier to me to explain a surprise good showing in a race (even chancing that track would be torn down. In some cases, this might be okay) than to defend the opposite with excuse-making and after-the-fact disclosure, or concealment.
20 Oct 2010 at 02:29 pm | #
OK, while I’m still trying to find out WHO paraded in front of me in Meadow Stables’ colors one sunny Saratoga day a long, long time ago (maybe it wasn’t a Secretariat “scratch,” maybe it was just a nice gesture on Mrs. Tweedy’s part, to let Secretariat—and I think, Riva, too—walk in front of the crowded stands as I’m recalling it).........
.....Allow me to comment re: NYRA PR and the ethics (or lack thereof) of announcing “stuck” horses.
Disclaimer: I worked in NYRA marketing, press box and racing office about 2 decades ago. Racing secretary at the time “stuck” horses a LOT, despite pleas from trainers, owners. We entry clerks were also instructed to “hustle” horses to make a race go (I remember one time a HoF trainer threatening to take his entire string, which was MIGHTY, down to the Jersey shore if a race he had entered, and which his horse badly needed as a stakes prep, didn’t go as carded. It went, and with an incredibly short field because no one wanted to race against that particular horse.) So in my humble opinion, I believe the betting public and other competitors have a right to know if a horse has been “stuck” or, in fact, “hustled” into a race. But GOOD LUCK making that a racing “model rule” when we can’t even agree on uniform rules re: race day medication!!!
As for NYRA PR, it’s not any racetrack’s job to promote a racing movie. But back in the day NYRA DID do a much better job of promoting the sport than they do now (e.g., Breakfast at Belmont, which, when I was a little girl on LI, was PACKED every weekend, and made this gal a fan for life).
Despite the tragic race result, NYRA also did a tremendous job promoting the “Great” Match Race in 1975, with the “I’m for Him” (FP) and “I’m for Her” (R) pinbacks they gave out. NYRA also produced a tremendously successful HorseFair 2-3 years in a row in the late 1980s, tied in with the Belmont Stakes, a week-long event featuring several breeds of horses and held in the Belmont backyard/parking lot area. It attracted huge audiences, though detractors said it wouldn’t/didn’t bring in any new fans to racing going on just a few yards away. But the HorseFair stands were PACKED.
NYRA also had success with promoting the 17th anniversary (yes,strange number) of Big Red’s Belmont win on June 9, 1990 with pinbacks and posters given away that day.
So while NYRA (and other tracks) may have been—indeed, ARE—asleep at the wheel in promoting racing in general and the Secretariat movie in particular, I don’t think it’s any racetrack’s responsibility to help promote a Disney movie that is mildly entertaining at best and factually inaccurate at worst.
20 Oct 2010 at 02:48 pm | #
Sorry about my long rant above. But I am intrigued by the following, which DOES, in fact, pertain to the “Secretariat” movie:
I am frankly surprised that Bill Nack, Paul Moran, Steve Crist, and any other TPA member worth that membership badge hasn’t commented on the fact that not too long ago, right around the time of Secretariat’s death in 1989, Ms. Chenery and other Secretariat syndicate owners claimed ownership of all Secretariat’s “publicity rights,” and anyone who wanted to paint him, write about him, sell photos of him or create anything with his likeness in or on that work would have to pay a “licensing fee,” and submit 2 samples of the work for “approval,” and agree to pay 10-15% of net sales of the artist’s work back to Chenery et al...who specified that all this money was supposed to go to the Grayson-Jockey Club Research Foundation.
The artistic community raged. The idea of licensing Secretariat’s likeness and collecting fees seemed absurd, and artists wailed about their artistic freedom being limited.
So whatever happened to that arrangement? Did Penny back down? Did Disney have to pay that “licensing fee” and kick back to Grayson in order to make this movie?
Hey, you professional turf writers out there: this is worth examining. Why did Penny try to put a “seal of approval” on Secretariat works back in 1989-90, and did she conveniently forget about the licensing agreements she so vehemently argued for, and won, a few years ago?
25 Oct 2010 at 06:37 pm | #
I find it extremely difficult to believe that it would be “prohibitively expensive” to obtain rights to Secretariat’s race videos. “The Life and Times of Secretariat”, a VHS produced by ESPN 20-some years ago managed to purchase the rights and they couldn’t expect a tiny fraction of the revenues as this Disney fantasy story.
It is as if Disney only makes movies for 10 year olds. This movie demonized trainers, Mr Phipps, and Sham and ignores Riva Ridge to boot.
I for one won’t buy a ticket for this revisionist movie. Instead, I purchased the wonderful book “Secretariat’s Meadow - The Land, The Family, The Legend” by Kate Chenery Tweedy. Tells the real story.
When released on DVD, I’ll rent the movie from Netflx but then follow it immediately with the ESPN video so I can see the real horse once again as I saw him in my youth…
02 Nov 2010 at 01:17 pm | #
Being a fan of horseracing for many years, I was a bit disappointed with the movie; however, the movie was strictly for entertainment. It was not meant to be a documentary. I was a bit confused when it appears in the movie that Sham won The Wood Memorial. The race scenes were far below what I expected and the use of Evangaline Downs for The Belmont was a poor choice. The actual running of The Belmont is available on many sites; the “makeshift” running of the race was anti-climactic for that day in New York it had to be extremely festive. The background of Evangaline is nothing like the background at Belmont. It is strange that the actual Preakness was used as the family watched from their Colorado home. Overall,the true fan will be disappointed but the casual moviegoer will be highly entertained. And, I can’t say enough about Diane Lane. She was astounding.
03 Dec 2010 at 07:54 pm | #
Thank you Mr. Christine for the best review I’ve read so far of the movie. I too knew what to expect fm googling for any information and knew I wld be really disappointed. The Baltimore Sun review re. pivotal role of Preakness gave glimmer of hope, but not to be. You watched the family watching the race on TV.
I wanted the movie to follow Bill Nack’s great bio as close to 100% as possible. It wld’ve made a great story, opening with a cold rainy night, 3/29/1970, the calls to Howard Gentry, rush to the foaling shed, show long shot of shed with one small light glowing in dark corner of field, AND accurate setting of birth. Penny and her wide eyed kiddies, Lucien etc, were NOT even there.
I cld go on about what to show, The Hopeful moment, when Secretariat got going and circled field sprinting in less than 22 with Turcotte in awe. Description is that race is surreal. Then WoodMeml, discovery and dismissal of abscess that morning, NOONE tells Turcotte, his bewilderment after race, then ecstasy upon learning of it, then his agony realizing what pain he caused Secretariat bec he tight-reined him.
Charles Hatton (create this character!)upon seeing Secretariat for the very first time, my goodness, Nack’s description of that was mesmerizing. Eddie Arcaro’s reaction upon seeing him for the first time, walking around him studying him and then.... “God, he’s a grand lookin’ son of a b.” Pixiesh Lucien grinning, “Isn’t he though.
I can’t see movie again bec breaking into “Oh Happy Day” in Belmont stretch (filming so disjointed) is too much for me.
06 Feb 2011 at 03:06 pm | #
Just so you know, the movie does show Angle Light winning the Wood Memorial, with Sham 2nd and Secretariat 3rd. I agree that they could have just told the story as it happened without adding or taking away. But it was still a good movie as it got the point across as to the kind of horse that Secretariat was.
15 Feb 2011 at 08:40 pm | #
aion kinah
wow gold
Fine information, many thanks to the author. It is puzzling to me now, but in general, the usefulness and importance is overwhelming. Very much thanks again and best of luck!
Aion US CD-Key
buy wow gold
Buy Maple Story US Mesos
Maple Story US Mesos
cartier watches
cartier necklaces
cartier pens
15 Feb 2011 at 09:06 pm | #
Very excellent post you have I must say.. Simple but yet interesting and engaging.. Keep up the good work!Best of luck and keep it up!
aion kinah
wow gold
Aion US CD-Key
buy wow gold
Buy Maple Story US Mesos
Maple Story US Mesos
cartier watches
cartier necklaces
cartier pens
27 Nov 2011 at 10:42 am | #
Awesome Movie, yes we all know the facts have been distorted like so many other movies, and definately did not need to in this case, but my goodness, get over it. Secretariat was still heartfelt, inspiring and motivational. Who cares if the truth was bent. All Movies do it, like I said all Movies do it and its just that a MOVIE. If you want the truth read the book or watch the Biography!!