For the opening of Santa Anita, I'm going to ape the late Jack Rice, one of my early idols. Rice wrote out of St. Louis for about 30 years, and was a wordsmith of the first order, but few knew of him nationally then and fewer even remember him now. He followed the St. Louis Cardinals' baseball team for a time, and was once with them on an East Coast swing when they were rained out four straight days. This is how Rice would have described the Santa Anita opener: "The sun shone, birds sang and mildew departed from Santa Anita yesterday. . . "
In the days leading up to opening day, Santa Anita was hit by 14 inches of rain, part of one of the wettest Decembers ever for the City of Angels. It's supposed to rain after Christmas, not before. Frank Stronach, hanging on his to ownership rights via some corporate pas de deux, was either lucky or prescient, spending $3 million that he doesn't have to rip out a synthetic abortion that wouldn't drain and installing 50,000 tons of dirt and clay. For a day, marked by all nine races on the main track because the turf course was an unplayable lie, Santa Anita got along swimmingly, if you'll pardon the expression. No horses broke down, or drowned, and 34,000 turned out, the men among them blessing their wives as they went across the way, to the shopping center, for their Christmas exchanges.
These record times were registered in the face of a comment by Ted Malloy, a Stronach consultant who is at the helm of the crafting of the new track. "I've always believed that slow is better, as long as it's consistent," Malloy told the Thoroughbred Times before the meet opened. The horses will have their chance to meet Malloy half-way during the final 75 days of the meet.
Twirling Candy, flirting with sacrilege, broke Spectacular Bid's 1:20 record with a time of 1:19.70. Twirling Candy might still be undefeated if he hadn't been stretched out to nine furlongs in his previous start. He is trained by John Sadler and was ridden by Joel Rosario, as were the other two graded stakes winners on the card. There are 43 more graded stakes to be run by the time the meet ends on April 17, and you can take it to the bank that Sadler and Rosario will not win them all. But on the day after Christmas, with visions of sugarplums still dancing in my head, it was nice to conjure up that they were the only horsemen with a chance to.
Sadler phoned in his three wins. He was hors de combat, with a knee injury, and his assistant, Larry Benavidez, took over. After Twirling Candy won the Grade I Malibu, somebody from HRTV asked if he had a message for his boss. "Can I get the week off?" the grinning Benavidez said.
The crowd might have been higher than the last time Santa Anita opened on a Sunday, but the on-track handle was off by 15% from last year (when they ran one more race), and overall betting dropped 23%. There were snowstorms in the East, even blizzard conditions some places, which no doubt kept many horseplayers hard by their hearths, but this is the meet when takeout is taking a quantum leap, starting January 1. Purses are supposed to rise, but if handle is eviscerated, the whole exercise could be counter-productive.
A bettors' boycott, tenatively scheduled for mid-January, is likely, according to members of the Horseplayers Association of America. Andy Asaro, one of the concerned bettors, looked at the opening-day figures and said: "These numbers are stunning. I guess the unofficial boycott has started for most of us. There is no way to spin this. We need new leadership in California racing." Presumably he was talking about the California Horse Racing Board, which approved the boost in takeout. Members of the board have tried to defend the hike. But if it keeps raining this winter in Southern California, and if a substantial segment of the serious bettors stays away, one of the game's grand old tracks, and California's last hope for survival, will be up to its eyeballs in something that doesn't even rhyme with mildew.


28 Dec 2010 at 07:43 am | #
I am more shocked over the drop in handle than if Stronach announced he was giving Santa Anita to Oak Tree for free.
Dirt, Santa Anita opening day, and down by those figures is the sign of the apocalypse for California racing.
I was hoping (even though I support the boycott) a huge increase so as to coax DMTC into replacing their junk.
Not to be.
28 Dec 2010 at 10:23 am | #
Andy Asaro could not have expressed my feelings any better.
“These numbers are stunning. I guess the unofficial boycott has started for most of us. There is no way to spin this. We need new leadership in California racing.” Presumably he was talking about the California Horse Racing Board, which approved the boost in takeout.”
Roger Way
28 Dec 2010 at 10:42 am | #
I’d just like to emphasize that this is not necessarily about Santa Anita. It could be any one of the Southern California Tracks running with a massive raise in takeouts on the horizon. In my opinion Santa Anita should match the exotic takeout rates of Gulfstream Park. Gulfstream will have larger average field size and lower takeout on popular exotic wagers. There is still time for Santa Anita to get on the right side of this and support Horseplayers who just want a fair shake.
http://www.playersboycott.org/Article_AlternativesToCalifornia02.html
• A 50 cent Pick-5 with a record low 15 percent takeout.
• Low takeout rates on Bet-3 and 50 cent Pick-4 wagers of only 20 percent.
This is not only about the takeout hike, it’s about the way Horseplayers are treated by the CHRB. One example is when Horseplayers Jeff Platt and Barry Meadow went before the CHRB board over the Los Alamitos takeout hike. They had a deal back then that if handle went down at Los Alamitos they would rescind the takeout raise. Not only did they go back on their word, this happened:
When Jeff Platt of the Horseplayers Association of North America testified on a matter relating to a takeout increase at Los Alamitos, Platt made the mistake of bringing his laptop computer and coffee mug to the witness table. “Mr. Platt has brought his coffee to the table, thinking he’s going to be here for a long time,” said Brackpool, who sets strict time limits on witnesses and public comments. “I’ve never seen that before.”
During that same discussion, horseplayer Barry Meadow addressed the board and tried to use several analogies to explain why an increase in takeout was a bad idea. Brackpool cut him off, saying, “I’m only going to permit you two analogies per comment.”
Does anyone think this is OK?
28 Dec 2010 at 02:53 pm | #
AA,
Official or not, it sure looks like the pre-boycott is under way and under-promoted. Maybe this will help.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJ5-FoiBuVc
With apologies to Jeff Christie:
C’mon, boys, and join the fight
Takeout’s too high and that’s not right
Now they want an even bigger bite
Lower takeout!
Handle’s dropping and it’s a shame
Horsemen and track execs share the blame
Looks like we’re in for still more of the same
Lower takeout!
Lower takeout! Lower takeout!
Get new faces to play the game.
Lower takeout! Lower takeout!
Keep existing players in the frame.
Got no time for equivocation,
Got no time to fret
Tomorrow’s handle will be lower,
And we’ll have less to bet.
So lower takeout!
Rebates to players that bet a lot
Tilt the field against those who do not
Everybody once had an equal shot
Lower takeout!
When Seabiscuit ran, take was ten percent
Since then they’ve already doubled the dent
Now they’re trying for every last cent
Lower takeout!
Lower takeout! Lower takeout!
Create more winners to carry the flame.
Lower takeout! Lower takeout!
Don’t force players to leave the game.
We’ve got an organization now.
We can have a greater voice
You can help save racing now,
If you’ll just make the choice
To lower takeout!
Lower takeout! Lower takeout!
Help fellow players save the game.
Lower takeout! Lower takeout!
Don’t let racing go down the drain.
30 Dec 2010 at 02:38 pm | #
BC,
Today’s Finley column dealing with the “Disaster at Santa Anita” refers to CHRB board members as “dense and ignorant.” Please consider doing a piece on how the CHRB and TOC evolved into the decision-making debacles that have brought us to this point.
Maybe we’re past the point where resignations by the CHRB chair and vice-chair are sufficient. Can you and/or any of your HRI colleagues or readers suggest any capable, concerned Californians who could potentially be appointed by the new governor to serve on a committee to create a proposal for restructuring these two bodies before California racing expires?