Fast forwarding, one of the last persons I would have expected to respond to anything written in this forum was Richard Shapiro, former chairman of the California Horse Racing Board. The cross that Shapiro carries is being the poster boy for the synthetic-track era in California, and I've piled on with the rest of them since the Pro-Rides, the Polytracks and the what-have-yous have turned the West Coast game upside down.
Since Shapiro stepped down at the racing board, he's pretty much been a card-carrying troglodyte. He had some serious personal setbacks, having invested heavily with the infamous Bernard Madoff, and he emerged briefly after the synthetic damage had been done to say that if he had to do it all over again, he wouldn't have.
But Shapiro, who used to take up his pen anytime the trade publications presented a vacant page, has left oratory behind him. So it was with bemusement that a lot of us watched recently when he apparently threw a brickbat at Jerry Jamgotchian at the bottom of a column I wrote about the opening of Del Mar. Shapiro despising Jamgotchian is not unusual; they were foes after Shapiro inexplicably keyed Jamgotchian's car in a racetrack parking lot and paid for the damages, and even before that, Jamgotchian showed up at many Shapiro-led board meetings as a self-styled watchdog/gadfly.
But why come out now, to make some sophomoric comment about Jamgotchian's love affair with upper case? Was this just one more kneejerk reaction, like the car-keying?
Techs at horseraceinsider.com traced the so-called Shapiro remarks to New York. Then Shapiro, answering an e-mail query, e-mailed back: "I have no idea what you are talking about. I don't know the Website, and I certainly did not comment on anything."
There was a domino effect. Another blogger supported Jamgotichian and derided Shapiro. "Jerry speaks the truth," he said. I asked Jamgotchian if he was also masquerading under another name, and you could hear his indignity all the way to San Francisco.
But it didn't end there. There was another bogus missive from Shapiro, this one containing braggadocio about his financial recovery, and suggesting that horseplayers learn to handicap synthetic tracks instead of just complaining about them.
Then Keith Brackpool, current chairman of the California racing board, appeared to post his reaction. The "Brackpool" comment didn't spare four-letter words, upbraided Jamgotchian and forced horseraceinsider.com to invoke its wash-out-with-soap rule.
The real Keith Brackpool answered with: "I hope it would go without saying that given my position in the industry, I would never comment in such a fashion. . . To be crystal clear, (that) was not written by me, nor have I commented on this or any other blog."
The Internet is the classic double-edged sword. Many newspapers used to call writers of letters to the editor, to make sure they were legit before the letters were published. There's no such luxury on the Internet. What they write is what you get, most of the time. By the time the editors and the smut police get to the material, it can be too late. In every deck of cards, there's a jack of spades capable of squirting cider in your ear.


27 Jul 2010 at 06:45 pm | #
Bill,
Don’t know if Mr. Shapiro commented legitimately on not beaneath your story. He was disingenuous, however, about not knowing the website.
Unless the e mail communications I received from him in the past were purely coincidental.
Thanks for shining a light on this.
JP
27 Jul 2010 at 07:55 pm | #
Thanks, JRP.
I knew about Shapiro being on this site before, or at least being aware of it, but just let it pass. He’s like shooting fish in a barrel.
29 Jul 2010 at 09:59 am | #
The ironic thing I find about Richard Shapiro is that he wanted the legacy of his term as the CHRB Chairman to be the installation of synthetic tracks.
Well he got his wish, it’s what he’s known for. Just not the way he wanted it.
29 Jul 2010 at 07:16 pm | #
Gentlemen,
Your efforts at due diligence while commendable, appear inconclusive. One can only say that the imposter did not carry the impost of ignominy one might expect of his namesake, were he authentic.
If, indeed, it is shooting a fish in a barrel to suggest that California racing is now wearing a barrel as a result of both CHRB action and inaction during the real former chairman’s watch, then excuse me while I adjust the crosshairs.
In my opinion the effects of Mr. Shapiro’s tenure were no less financially devastating on California horseplayers collectively than Mr. Madoff’s effect was on him. An icon of ineptness, if not temporary insanity, the Schwarzenegger appointee morphed from industry regulator to industry terminator by continuing to ignore customer interests.
From the start, he prioritized increasing on-track attendance over expanding internet access to California racing even though off-track sources account for up to 90% of handle. He allowed ADWs to continue exclusive contracts with California tracks for far too long. Why weren’t any new ADWs that openly offered rebates to small bettors licensed to compete with existing, licensed ADWs for the business of California residents?
Interestingly, at that time the CHRB did license CDI’s Twinspires ADW, thereby allowing the company that purchased and degraded Hollywood Park—and then sold it to developers –- a second chance to line its shareholders’ pockets at California horseplayer expense. Since then, CDI has developed a history of frequently preventing varying subsets of off-track players nationwide from accessing signals to and/or from entities with which the company is “negotiating” until a “happy ending” is written for CDI.
Suffice it to say that once these same ADWs started overtly as well as covertly offering rebates to small bettors, the CHRB rescinded its anti-rebate policy. Still, for some time now, on-track and other non-rebated California players have been at a disadvantage competing against players (frequently out-of-state) who are subsidized outside the pari-mutuel system with portions of excessive takeout that are being diverted back to them instead of fueling higher winning payoffs and subsequent purses.
HRI readers might find the following panel discussion from 2005 of interest:
http://www.harnesstracks.com/2005_annual_meeting/2005annualmeeting.htm
Returning Fans to the Racetrack, And Solving Problems That Have Driven Them
Bill Hoge, former California legislator and full-time handicapper
Richard Shapiro, California Horse Racing Board
To me it appears that the former chairman understood the impact high takeout has on small bettors, yet I can’t find any public evidence that he ever did anything other than pay lip service about it.
It is important to note that even in his absence, the CHRB itself remains a bastion of incompetence, ineffectiveness, and insider influence. Some faces are different, the voices more strident, but the decisions less tolerable. Even in the acknowledged public presence of horseplayer representation they vote in private against bettor interests in favor of tracks and horsemen.
Not content that the CHRB seemingly violates its mission to protect resident bettors, it is now reported that California tracks and horsemen are trying to bypass the CHRB and effect takeout increases through the state legislature. I can’t wait to hear a Gubernatorial candidate say that he/she is willing to sign the bill.