ARGUMENTS ON BOTH SIDES OF H.R. 1754 NEED TO CONSIDER NOT ALL BREEDS CREATED EQUAL

Once again, the Thoroughbred racing industry is at loggerheads, only this time appearing before a Congressional Subcommittee hearing which has held these types of inquiries before but perhaps none as meaningful.

Never has the industry faced an existential crisis of major proportions. “Too big to fail” is no longer a justifiable defense for a sport whose end-product is more about the sales ring than what happens between the fences.

Everyone knows why this is happening, even though some version of the Horseracing Integrity Act has been kicking around since 2015 which, by Capitol Hill standards, is the blink of an eye.

On one side people are fighting hard for the lives of horses and the men and women who ride them. On the other are champions of the upperdog who invoke the health of the bottom line in order to maintain the status quo.

The solutions proposed by the latter never go quite far enough. What replaces doing the right thing is to question process, making a call for compromise knowing all too well that patchwork unity has never worked.

This ersatz search for middle ground is the same kind of hypocrisy practiced by those in Washington who would save the country’s top executive at the cost of a democratic republic. But I digress.

As was widely reported in racing publications, Bloodhorse and the Thoroughbred Daily News, to name just two, speaking for the health of the living and breathing was a Hall of Fame jockey who won over 7,000 races.

Another advocating for the Horseracing Integrity Act was the former CEO of the Maryland Jockey Club who is now an advisor to the Humane Society of America.

In favor of those who hesitate to turn a page and would keep the present frozen in time is a person whose organization would become anachronistic if legislation is enacted, and another who represents a group that would take an economic hit if raceday medication were eliminated.

The bipartisan bill – which in this climate should put the legislation over the top without further discussion – would have the United States Anti-Doping Agency form an authority including major industry players to regulate medication rules, policies, testing and sanctions.

Indeed, the elephant in the room that H.R. 1754 would attempt to carry across the finish line is the elimination of raceday medication, legal and otherwise, a policy that would end the use of Lasix in competition.

“Instead of giving the animal the rest it needs, a trainer can rely on his/her veterinarian to administer a medication to mask pain by reducing inflammation caused by an injury,” said Chris McCarron. “This bill directly addresses one of the leading causes of breakdowns.”

“The bar for effectively detecting and punishing cheaters is so low that it is difficult to fail,” reasoned Joe DeFrancis.

“Each trainer knows what they’re being tested for and when they are being tested. There is little if any out-of-competition testing, the kind of testing that has proven so effective in catching athletes who dope in Olympic sports,” DeFrancis concluded.

In favor of maintaining the 38-state patchwork with enhancements and modifications, effectively protecting the franchise, was Ed Martin, President of the Association of Racing Commissioners International.

“I don’t think this bill as presently written is going to improve the integrity of the sport,” said Martin.

“But I think it would improve the integrity of the sport if it were to take [a non-governmental organization and turn it into a multi-jurisdictional investigative organization] to do out-of-competition testing as well as out-of-competition suitability exams that are red-flagged because of their vet records and procedures.”

Promises of meaningful enhancements puts lipstick on the same-old pig even if the stricter protocols advanced by Santa Anita’s management group has enjoyed statistical success with improved protocols. And at least the company continues to walk its talk; as the Lasix-less Pegasus Cup proved.

The Thoroughbred industry has had decades to police itself and clean up its act. But if it were not for the fact that 37 horses lost their lives last winter at Santa Anita, the raceday medication elephant would remain in a lockbox.

After the hearing concluded, the Thoroughbred Safety Coalition, comprised of a 14-member majority of leading Thoroughbred stakeholders and racetracks, issued a statement re continuing industry-led advanced safety measures with a promise to enact meaningful change.

But the industry has had decades to accomplish these goals. The major group yet to endorse medication reform is the National Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association, who use their veto power to stop simulcasting in its tracks.

The final version of HIA must address this roadblock. Absent independent national uniformity, no effort to clean up the game will succeed in a meaningful way.

If there’s a segment of horse racing that has reason to embrace the status quo on raceday medication it’s the harness industry, which did not get a seat at the table. Indeed, Mike Tanner, Executive Vice-President of the United States Trotting Association, was interviewed but not selected to appear.

And the irony is that harness owners will pay more than Thoroughbred counterparts to fund the proposed commission established by the possible legislation.

With an anticipated $43-45 per-start fee, and with the average Standardbred racing 18 times per year on average, compared to six for Thoroughbreds, it will cost harness owners more.

There are other fundamentals to have different rules for different breeds considering the routine way each sport is conducted.

Many harness juveniles, e.g., begin their careers without Lasix though they gravitate to it with age. The ARCI, which passed 12 harness specific model-rules amendments last August in Saratoga, acknowledges that separate standards may be appropriate.

Statistics indicate that Standardbreds sustain three times the damage of Thoroughbreds in the course of a racing year and can race until age 14. Both breeds train and race with Lasix, but “training miles” are a routine part of maintaining condition in Standardbreds.

As in Thoroughbred racing, most violations are a result of therapeutic medication overages. But unlike the crop flap at Santa Anita last season, sanctions for whipping violations and kicking that abuse the animal, as well as dangerous interference infractions, already exists.

Racetracks in various states for either breed fail to report catastrophic injuries. But the USTA has statistics for both breeds that, according to the California Horse Racing Board database, are eye-opening.

A decade’s worth of statistics on racing in California was compiled from 2009 through 2018. [Thoroughbred starters in 2009 was an estimated 45,000].

During this period all Standardbreds made 83,592 starts at Cal-Expo, compared to 381,531 Thoroughbred starters state-wide. There were 914 Thoroughbred fatalities during this time. While the numbers have improved markedly since, that translates to 2.40 deaths per 1000 starters.

The Standardbred ledger shows seven fatalities. In five of the 10 years, there were no fatalities; the mortality rate was 0.08 per 1000 starters. Given that Standardbreds annually race three times more often, raceday medication in harness racing seems to be working as intended, therapeutically.

Thoroughbred racing if a different game, of course. “Let’s not make the perfect the enemy of the good; we need to take action right away,” DeFrancis added. “Every day we delay we’re losing more and more public support, more and more fans, more and more customers. And it’s getting that much more difficult to get them back.”

Said HIA co-sponsor Rep. Paul Tonko (D-NY): “We’re all in theory talking about the same goals, and yet each of you [who testified against it] opposes the very piece of legislation that would make [uniformity] a reality instead of a tired talking point.”

Share on facebook
Facebook Share
Share on twitter
Twitter Share
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn Share
Share on email
Email
Share on print
Print

⚠ Before you comment

Our staff likes nothing better than to engage with the HRI Faithful and provide a forum for interaction on horseracing and sports. In that spirit, please be kind and reasonable; keep the language clean, and the tone civil. Comments from those who cannot comply will be deleted. Thank you.

6 Responses

  1. John: Not to get off-topic but you are still the go-to guy when it comes to NYRA news. Today’s announcement about the change in track announcers seems very strange. Johnny I could have been named the full-time track announcer on several occasions over the years. He has been the “back-up” for over 40 years. Moreover, if its true that NYRA and Larry Collmus couldn’t reach an agreement, that could have been announced prior to his contract expiring at the end of the calendar year.
    However, this is just the latest in a line of announcements that have been very late in coming. For example, I have been buying reserved seats for the Belmont for at least the past 25 years. I can’t remember a prior year where the tickets were not available by the last week in January. NYRA has not even provided a timetable for release of the tickets as of yet.
    Also, did you notice that NYRA hasn’t even put out a press release about the start of the FOX 2 shows this Saturday? The alleged announcement was made by Andy S during talking horse last Sunday. They finally put out a news item on their website about the x-country pick 5 this afternoon.
    I’m not sure if all of this has something to do with the construction of the Islanders Arena, but in this day and age, late is tantamount to almost never. Somebody, or many bodies, at NYRA do not seem to be doing their jobs. If you click on the Belmont portion of the NYRA site, as I just did, you will find the stakes schedule for last Fall. It is about to Febnruary of 2020, and NYRA can’t even get the year straight on its own website. Something is rotten in Jamaica.
    Thanks for putting up with the rant, John. Maybe you can ask Mark Berner to make a cameo to get to the bottom of this.

  2. I watch a lot of Harness and there are hardly ever any fatal breakdowns, accidents yes, but fatal almost never. Drivers are more likely to get hurt than the horses in fact.

    Also, though many Standardbreds race with Lasix, the percentage that do is not nearly as high as with Thoroughbreds, though I have no figures to back that up, just an observation from handicapping a lot of races.

    It seems unfair to me to require the Harness industry to comply with the same rules as the Tbreds.

  3. Second comment.
    From what I’ve read, this entire thing is a non-starter to begin with as it’s generally accepted that Mitch McConnell is on the side of whatever CD I wants, and they don’t want this
    .
    The bill is likely never to get anywhere in the Senate, like the 400-odd pieces of legislation passed by the House that are currently just sitting on McConnell’s desk.

  4. Until I did a little research, I didn’t realize it either. Harness racing has their drug issues but it appears therapeutic meds aren’t one of them.

  5. Den, you mean like Senate witnesses to affirm what everyone knows is true? Country truly becomes more corrupt by the day. The 1% is above the law.

    Three of every four Americans want witnesses, Moscow Mitch says no and it’s no? These cowards feel they can’t get reelected without the base and the cultists love the Criminal-in-Chief.

    The National HBPA, CDI and Dennis Drazin want the status quo and are calling for “compromise.” Right, let’s kick this around for another five years…

Leave a Reply to Framarco Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *